Search

Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most common malignant tumours and is still associated with a poor prognosis in advanced disease. To improve the standard therapy with gemcitabine, we initiated a prospective randomised phase-II trial with gemcitabine (GEM) versus gemcitabine plus sunitinib (SUNGEM) based on data of in vitro trials and phase-I data for the combination treatment. The rational of adding sunitinib was its putative antiangiogenic mechanism of action. Methods A total of 106 eligible patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic PDAC without previous system therapy were randomised to receive GEM at a dosage of 1.000 mg/m 2 d1, 8, 15 q28 versus a combination of SUNGEM at a dosage of GEM 1.000 mg/m 2 d1 + 8 and sunitinib 50 mg p.o. d1–14, q21d. The primary end-point was progression free survival (PFS), secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), toxicity and overall response rate (ORR). Results The confirmatory analysis of PFS was based on the intend-to-treat (ITT) population ( N = 106). The median PFS was 13.3 weeks (95% confidence interval (95%-CI): 10.4–18.1 weeks) for GEM and 11.6 weeks for SUNGEM (95%-CI: 7.0–18.0 weeks; p = 0.78 one-sided log-rank). The ORR was 6.1% (95%-CI: 0.7–20.2%) for GEM and for 7.1% (95%-CI: 0.9–23.5%) for SUNGEM ( p = 0.87). The median time to progression (TTP) was 14.0 weeks (95%-CI: 12.4–22.3 weeks) for GEM and 18.0 weeks (95%-CI: 11.3–19.3 weeks) for SUNGEM ( p = 0.60; two-sided log-rank). The median OS was 36.7 weeks (95%-CI: 20.6–49.0 weeks) for the GEM arm and 30.4 weeks (95%-CI: 18.1–37.6 weeks) for the SUNGEM ( p = 0.78, one-sided log-rank). In regard to toxicities, suspected SAEs were reported in 53.7% in the GEM arm and 71.2% in the SUNGEM arm. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was statistically significantly higher in the SUNGEM arm with 48.1% versus 27.8% in the GEM arm ( p = 0.045, two sided log-rank). Conclusions The combination SUNGEM was not sufficient superior in locally advanced or metastatic PDAC compared to GEM alone in regard to efficacy but was associated with more toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The number of cancer patients in Europe is rising and significant advances in basic and applied cancer research are making the provision of optimal care more challenging. The concept of cancer as a systemic, highly heterogeneous and complex disease has increased the awareness that quality cancer care should be provided by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) of highly qualified healthcare professionals. Cancer patients also have the right to benefit from medical progress by receiving optimal treatment from adequately trained and highly skilled medical professionals. Built on the highest standards of professional training and continuing medical education, medical oncology is recognised as an independent medical specialty in many European countries. Medical oncology is a core member of the MDT and offers cancer patients a comprehensive and systemic approach to treatment and care, while ensuring evidence-based, safe and cost-effective use of cancer drugs and preserving the quality of life of cancer patients through the entire ‘cancer journey’. Medical oncologists are also engaged in clinical and translational research to promote innovation and new therapies and they contribute to cancer diagnosis, prevention and research, making a difference for patients in a dynamic, stimulating professional environment. Medical oncologists play an important role in shaping the future of healthcare through innovation and are also actively involved at the political level to ensure a maximum contribution of the profession to Society and to tackle future challenges. This position paper summarises the multifarious and vital contributions of medical oncology and medical oncologists to today's and tomorrow's professional cancer care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]