Search

LVAD patients awaiting a donor heart in the United States have a shorter median duration of LVAD support and a higher frequency of comorbid conditions when compared to patients in Europe.[3] Despite differences in patient selection and donor heart availability, long-term survival after HM3 implantation is comparable. Survival after HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device implantation: real-world data from Europe Survival of end-stage heart failure patients on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support continuously increases.[1] Nowadays, the HeartMate 3 (HM3, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) LVAD is most commonly implanted. [Extracted from the article]

Aim: This study aimed to assess safety and outcomes of patients, 2 years after implantation with the HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist System.Methods and Results: This study included 50 adults with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IIIB or IV symptoms or American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage D heart failure with an ejection fraction ≤25% and a cardiac index ≤2.2 L/min/m2 without inotropes, or inotrope-dependent with optimal medical management, or listed for heart transplant. The median duration of left ventricular assist device support was 694 days (range: 19-833 days). At baseline, cardiac index was 1.8 ±0.5 L/min/m2 , 58% of patients were receiving inotropes, and 92% were INTERMACS profiles 2-4. At 2 years, Kaplan-Meier survival was 74 ±6%, 5 (10%) patients were transplanted, and 32 patients (64%) remain with support. Adverse event rates include bleeding requiring surgery (16%), gastrointestinal bleeding (20%), driveline infection (24%), ischaemic stroke (16%), haemorrhagic stroke (8%), right heart failure (14%), and outflow graft thrombosis (2%). Notably, no haemolysis, pump thrombosis, or pump malfunction events occurred. At 2 years, 47% of patients remained in NYHA class I and 41% in NYHA class II (P <0.0001). From baseline to 2 years, the mean six-minute walk distance increased from 239 m to 347 m (P <0.0001), and the mean EQ-5D quality of life score improved from 48.2 to 70.6 (P < 0.0001).Conclusions: Two years post-HeartMate 3 implantation, results show expected and acceptable survival, enhanced haemocompatibility, improved patient functional status and quality of life. This corroborates the success of HeartMate 3 since its first-in-man implantation case in Germany. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02170363. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The decision to implant durable mechanical circulatory systems (MCSs) in patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is challenging due to expected poor outcomes in these patients.Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify outcome predictors that may facilitate future patient selection and decision making.Methods: The Durable MCS after ECLS registry is a multicenter retrospective study that gathered data on consecutive patients who underwent MCS implantation after ECLS between January 2010 and August 2018 in 11 high-volume European centers. Several perioperative parameters were collected. The primary endpoint was survival at 1 year after durable MCS implantation.Results: A total of 531 durable MCSs after ECLS were implanted during this period. The average patient age was 53 ± 12 years old. ECLS cannulation was peripheral in 87% of patients and 33% of the patients had history of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ECLS implantation. The 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 77%, 53%, and 43%, respectively. The following predictors for 1-year outcome have been observed: age, female sex, lactate value, Model of End-Stage Liver Disease XI score, history of atrial fibrillation, redo surgery, and body mass index >30 kg/m2. On the basis of this data, a risk score and an app to estimate 1-year mortality was created.Conclusions: The outcome in patients receiving durable MCS after ECLS remains limited, yet preoperative factors may allow differentiating futile patients from those with significant survival benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This EUROMACS study was conducted with the primary aim of investigating the association between a centre's annual caseload and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation., Methods and Results: A total of 4802 patients identified between 2011 and 2020 from 35 participating centres were dichotomized based on the annual caseload of the treating centre at the time of device implant (≤30 vs. >30 LVAD implantations/year). The primary endpoint was 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes included overall survival analysis, device-related adverse events and readmissions. Cumulative follow-up was 10 003 patient-years, with a median follow-up of 1.54 years (interquartile range 0.52-3.15). Patients from higher volume centres more frequently presented in INTERMACS levels 1 and 2, suffered from right heart dysfunction and needed inotropic support. No difference was observed in adjusted 1-year survival. Adjusted overall survival probability was lower in higher volume centres (p = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis of HeartMate 3 devices only, higher volume centres were associated with decreased odds of 1-year survival (adjusted odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.97, p = 0.041). Similar findings were observed in the cumulative (i.e. learning curve) caseload analyses., Conclusion: In patients undergoing LVAD implantation, centre volume was not associated with 1-year survival, but was related to device-related adverse events. Patient profiles differed with respect to centre size. These findings underscore the necessity for ongoing quality improvement initiatives in all centres, regardless of their annual caseload. Efforts are needed to standardize patient selection and preconditioning to further improve patient outcome., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Objectives: The use of ventricular assist devices (VADs) in children is increasing. However, absolute numbers in individual centres and countries remain small. Collaborative efforts such as the Paedi-European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) are therefore essential for combining international experience with paediatric VADs. Our goal was to present the results from the fourth Paedi-EUROMACS report., Methods: All paediatric (<19 years) patients from the EUROMACS database supported by a VAD were included. Patients were stratified into a congenital heart disease (CHD) group and a group with a non-congenital aetiology. End points included mortality, a transplant and recovery. Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore associated factors for mortality, cerebrovascular accident and pump thrombosis., Results: A total of 590 primary implants were included. The congenital group was significantly younger (2.5 vs 8.0 years, respectively, P < 0.001) and was more commonly supported by a pulsatile flow device (73.5% vs 59.9%, P < 0.001). Mortality was significantly higher in the congenital group (30.8% vs 20.4%, P = 0.009) than in the non-congenital group. However, in multivariable analyses, CHD was not significantly associated with mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.285; confidence interval (CI) 0.8111-2.036, P = 0.740]. Pump thrombosis was the most frequently reported adverse event (377 events in 132 patients; 0.925 events per patient-year) and was significantly associated with body surface area (HR 0.524, CI 0.333-0.823, P = 0.005), CHD (HR 1.641, CI 1.054-2.555, P = 0.028) and pulsatile flow support (HR 2.345, CI 1.406-3.910, P = 0.001) in multivariable analyses., Conclusions: This fourth Paedi-EUROMACS report highlights the increasing use of paediatric VADs. The patient populations with congenital and non-congenital aetiologies exhibit distinct characteristics and clinical outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The ELEVATE Registry was designed to study long-term outcomes with the Heartmate 3 (HM3), a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal ventricular assist device, in a real-world population following CE-mark approval., Methods and Results: A total of 540 patients, implanted in Europe and the Middle East were followed in ELEVATE. The registry included 463 patients receiving the HM3 as primary implant (Primary Implant Cohort), 19 patients underwent a pump upgrade from another device (Pump Exchange Cohort) and 58 patients who had experienced an outcome before having the possibility to sign the Informed Consent, for which only outcome data were collected (Anonymized Cohort). Data collection included demographics, survival, adverse events, EQ-5D Visual Analog Score quality of life (EQ-5D VAS QOL) questionnaire, and 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Mean age was 55.6 ± 11.7 years (89% male, 48% ischaemic cardiomyopathy). Seventy per cent of patients were in INTERMACS Profile 1-3 and 12.7% were on temporary mechanical circulatory support. Primary Implant Cohort survival was 83% after 2 years. In the Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation Primary Implant Cohort, strokes were observed in 10.2%, gastrointestinal bleedings in 9.7%, pump thrombosis in 1.5%, and outflow graft twists in 3.5%. Heartmate 3 implantation resulted in a significant and sustained improvement of functional capacity and QOL., Conclusion: In a real-world population, cohort implanted with the HM3 left ventricular assist device we demonstrate good long-term survival, sustained improvement of functional capacity, and low rates of adverse events (including pump thrombosis)., Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02497950., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The paucity of available hearts for transplantation means that more patients remain on durable left ventricular support for longer periods of time. The Registry to Evaluate the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist System was an investigator-initiated multicenter, prospective, single-arm database established to collect post-Conformité Européene mark clinical information on patients receiving the HeartWare ventricular assist device system as a bridge to transplantation. This registry represents the longest multicenter follow-up of primary left ventricular assist device outcomes., Methods: Data were collected on 254 commercial implants performed between February 2009 and March 2012 from 9 centers in Europe (7) and Australia (2). Patients were followed to device explant, heart transplantation, or death. The outcomes of patients through July/August 2018 were analyzed. Summary statistics were used to describe patient demographics, adverse events, length of support, and outcomes for this extended-term cohort., Results: A total of 122 patients were on support for >2 years, and 34 patients were on support for >5 years. Twenty nine patients are still alive on support (support ranging from 1213 to 3396 days), and 23 of those are on their original HeartWare ventricular assist device system. Kaplan-Meier survival through 7 years was 51%. Through 6 years, freedom from any stroke was 82%, while freedom from severely disabling stroke was 89%., Conclusions: Low rates of heart transplant now require longer periods of left ventricular assist device support in patients. This analysis demonstrates that long-term support using a HeartWare ventricular assist device system offers survival of 51% through 7 years.

Objectives: The Registry to Evaluate the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist System (ReVOLVE) is an investigator-initiated multicentre, prospective, single-arm database established to collect post-Conformité Européenne Mark clinical information on patients receiving the HeartWare® Ventricular Assist System (HVAD®). The number of patients requiring longer periods of mechanical circulatory support is ever increasing and so further investigation into long-term outcomes in bridge-to-transplant populations is necessary., Methods: Data were collected on 254 commercial implants performed between February 2009 and March 2012 from nine centres in Europe (7 centres) and Australia (2 centres). Patients were followed to device explant, heart transplant or death, and the outcomes of patients who remained on support longer than 2 years were analysed. Summary statistics were used to describe patient demographics, adverse events, length of support and outcomes for this long-term cohort., Results: A total of 124 patients (49% of the original ReVOLVE population) were on support for more than 2 years (range: 731-2108 days), 76 of whom are still alive on support. Overall survival through 5 years was 59%., Conclusions: Owing to the low rate of heart transplants, a significant number of patients receiving a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant remain on support for prolonged periods, often exceeding 2, 3 and even 4 years. Real-world use of the HVAD system continues to show excellent outcomes for patients on the device, including those on support beyond 2 years., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Ventricular blood stasis is a concern for continuous flow mechanical support devices and might contribute to the formation of thromboembolic events. The HeartWare® Ventricular Assist System (HVAD®) is equipped with the Lavare™ cycle that is a periodic speed modulation feature designed to alter flow patterns within the left ventricle and reduce areas of potential blood stasis. Here, we report in vitro and clinical findings on the effects of the Lavare cycle., Methods: The effect of pump speed changes on the intraventricular flow field was examined with an in vitro particle image velocimetry model. The clinical impact of the Lavare cycle was evaluated through a retrospective review of the ReVOLVE study which includes 248 patients implanted with the HVAD following Conformité Européenne Mark in nine centres in Europe and Australia. Baseline characteristics, adverse event profiles and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were stratified by patients using/not using the Lavare cycle., Results: Particle image velocimetry showed increased ventricular washout with an active Lavare cycle as measured by the fluid velocities and angular dispersion parameters. With the Lavare cycle on, there was also a 22% decrease in the stagnation index compared with when the Lavare cycle was off. In the ReVOLVE registry, patients with the Lavare cycle turned on (n = 215) were supported for 497 patient-years, whereas patients who did not use the speed modulation (n = 33) were supported for 39.3 patient-years. The Lavare cycle did not significantly affect patient survival as both groups had approximately an 80% survival after 1 year. Patients using the Lavare cycle had significantly fewer rates of stroke [0.06 vs 0.20 events per patient-year (EPPY), P = 0.0008], sepsis (0.03 vs 0.15 EPPY, P = 0.0003) and right heart failure (0.03 vs 0.18 EPPY, P < 0.0001) with no difference in the transplant or recovery rates among the two cohorts., Conclusions: The Lavare cycle effectively generates ventricular washout and the adverse event profiles of ReVOLVE patients with the Lavare cycle on were better than those with the Lavare cycle off. Larger studies are warranted to verify the positive effect of the Lavare cycle and to optimize speed modulation settings, so additional clinically relevant improvements can be realized., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: The post-market Registry to Evaluate the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist System (ReVOLVE) is an investigator-initiated registry established to collect post-CE Mark Trial clinical data on patients receiving a HeartWare ventricular assist device (HVAD) in the European Union and Australia., Methods: The ReVOLVE is a multi-center, prospective, single-arm registry performed at seven centers in Europe and two in Australia. Herein we describe a total of 254 commercial HVAD implants according to labeled indications between February 2009 and November 2012. Summary statistics included patients' demographics, adverse events, length of support and outcomes., Results: Compared with the clinical trial supporting the CE Mark of the HeartWare system, patient selection differed in that patients were older, and there were higher proportions of females and patients with idiopathic cardiomyopathies in the ReVOLVE cohort. Duration of support ranged from 1 to 1,057 days, with a mean of 363 ± 280 days (median 299.5 days). Transplantation was done in 56 patients (22%), explant for recovery was performed in 3 patients (1%), 43 died while on support (17%), and 152 (60%) remain on the device. Success in patients with the HeartWare system was 87% at 6 months, 85% at 1 year, 79% at 2 years and 73% at 3 years. Adverse event rates were low, comparable or improved when compared to the CE Mark Trial., Conclusion: Real-world use of the HeartWare system continues to demonstrate excellent clinical outcomes in patients supported with the device., (Copyright © 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)