Search

Background: Females are less attracted than males to surgical specialties, which may be due to differences in the acquisition of skills. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies that investigate gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills.Methods: We performed a comprehensive database search using relevant search phrases and MeSH terms. We included studies that investigated the role of gender in the acquisition of surgical skills.Results: Our search yielded 247 studies, 18 of which were found to be eligible and were therefore included. These studies included a total of 2,106 study participants. The studies were qualitatively synthesized in five categories (studies on medical students, studies on both medical students and residents, studies on residents, studies on gender differences in needed physical strength, and studies on other gender-related training conditions). Male medical students tended to outperform females, while no gender differences were found among residents. Gaming experience and interest in surgery correlated with better acquisition of surgical skills, regardless of gender. Although initial levels of surgical abilities seemed lower among females, one-on-one training and instructor feedback worked better on females and were able to help the acquisition of surgical skills at a level that negated measurable gender differences. Female physicians possess the required physical strength for surgical procedures, but may face gender-related challenges in daily clinical practice.Conclusion: Medical students are a heterogeneous group with a range of interests and experiences, while surgical residents are more homogeneous perhaps due to selection bias. Gender-related differences are more pronounced among medical students. Future surgical curricula should consider tailoring personalized programs that accommodate more mentoring and one-on-one training for female physicians while giving male physicians more practice opportunities in order to increase the output of surgical training and acquisition of surgical skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Arthroscopy simulators offer safe and reproducible training to orthopaedic residents, thereby obviating the need for cadaver specimens. In addition, they collect data that can serve to investigate learning curves and evaluate training programmes with the goal of improving the quality of arthroscopy teaching. In this study, a cohort of surgeons was evaluated before and after a European theoretical and practical training programme that used a knee arthroscopy simulator. The primary objective was to assess whether the overall performance score was improved by the training programme. The secondary objectives were to determine which tasks and skills were improved by the programme, to compare a novice group to an experienced group, and to identify targets for improvement., Hypothesis: A theoretical and practical training course improves the scores achieved on an arthroscopy simulator task., Methods: A prospective comparative study was performed in 34 surgeons during the advanced arthroscopy training course organised by the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) in January 2018. All participants performed a diagnostic task on the VirtaMed ArthroS™ simulator before and after the programme. The participants were divided into two groups based on number of knee arthroscopies performed each year, i.e.,>20 (experienced group) vs.≤20 (inexperienced group). The following parameters were compared between the two groups: overall score, operative time, percentage of iatrogenic injuries, camera and hook path lengths, and success in identifying anatomical structures., Results: The overall score on the diagnostic task was 199 before and 203 after the training programme (p=0.02). The operative time decreased significantly, from 185 to 115.9seconds (p<0.01). Camera path length decreased from 85.2 to 49.2cm and hook path length from 65.5 to 15.0cm (p<0.05). The mean proportion of arthroscopies with iatrogenic tibial cartilage injuries diminished from 2.7%±1.7% (range, 0-6.7) to 1.8%±1.8% (range, 0-7) (p=0.03); no change occurred in femoral injuries. When each group was assessed separately, the only significant change found in the experienced group was a decrease in operative time, whereas in the inexperienced group all parameters improved significantly. However, visualisation of anatomical structures was unchanged., Conclusion: Participation in the training programme improved overall performance, and the gains were greatest in the inexperienced group. During the post-training evaluation, some of the major anatomical structures were classified by the simulator as incompletely visualised, raising concern about a risk of underdiagnosis during arthroscopic explorations., Level of Evidence: III, prospective comparative study., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)