Search

A quantitative literacy course titled "Computational Geology" has been taught at the University of South Florida for over 20 years at the undergraduate level, largely by the same professor. Due to the extended course tenure, a unique opportunity presented itself to qualitatively study what the perceived broader impacts of the course were on selected alumni from three or more years post-graduation. Viewing data from a 2016 course alumni interview project through a transcendental phenomenological lens, we looked for evidence to describe the lived experiences of nine course alumni. The alumni were baccalaureate geology graduates of USF, at least three years removed from graduation at the time of interview, who had taken and passed the Computational Geology course, and been working in private, public, or academic sectors. We discovered that the course positively impacted students' self-efficacy toward mathematics, nurtured a growing appreciation for using math as a tool to solve problems relevant to the students' personal life and career, and motivated students to learn and appreciate quantitatively literate behaviors and how quantitative literacy applies to their personal and professional life. We assert that instructors who consider the affective domain (i.e., feelings, emotions, and attitudes) while teaching mathematics leverage a powerful approach to impact student learning and incite a long-lasting impact on students' appreciation for quantitative literacy.

Medical marijuana (MMJ) was legalized in November 2016 with the passing of Amendment 2 in the state of Florida. Since the legalization, many studies have been conducted to understand the direct effect medical marijuana has on specific medical conditions. Unlike most allopathic drugs, medical marijuana does not target single ailments or specific conditions and does not follow precise recommending guidelines. There is scarce knowledge on how patient characteristics, including medical conditions, affect a physician's direct recommendations and registry limits. To obtain insight on the effect patient characteristics have on the clinical decision-making process, we conducted ten qualitative interviews of medical marijuana physicians who are certified to order medical marijuana for patients in Florida. Interview topics ranged from typical daily practice to specific recommendations for patient histories. Each interview was transcribed and thematically analyzed. Five major patient characteristics that influence a physician's recommendation emerged from the interviews: patient medical history, co-medications, lifestyle, marijuana experience level and counter-indications. Each category was analyzed further to understand how the characteristics influenced the practice of recommending and ordering product. Physicians emphasized the equivalent importance of reviewing a patient's medical history, lifestyle, and past marijuana experiences while also expressing the need to look holistically at the individual patient. Instead of the characteristics determining what the physician recommends for the patient and orders through the registry, the characteristics dictate the education given to the patient so that the patient may lead and determine their own individual care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]