Search

Objective: To evaluate the incidence, the impact on survival and the predictive factors of bile leakage (BL) in a recent large monocentric series of liver resections performed in a referral tertiary care centre., Background: Previous reports dealing with bile leakage (BL) after liver resection are rare and have displayed conflicting results regarding incidence, impact on follow-up and predictive factors., Methods: A retrospective review of the records of 912 patients who underwent a total of 1001 consecutive liver resections without biliary reconstruction, performed between January 2005 and May 2011. BL was defined by the presence of bile in the abdominal drains, a radiologically or surgically drained bilioma or biliary peritonitis. BL severity was established according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Fifty-eight pre-, per- and post-resection variables were analysed and the independent BL predictive factors were identified using logistic regression., Results: The incidence of BL was 8%. Clavien-Dindo I-II, IIIa, IIIb or IV rates were 29%, 35%, 32.5% and 2.5%, respectively. BL did not increase in-hospital mortality (2.5% versus 2.9%, P = 1.0), but doubled the median duration of hospital stay (16 versus 9 days, P < 0.001) and increased 1-year mortality (11% versus 5%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis identified that pre-operative bevacizumab [odds ratio (OR) = 2.9, confidence interval (CI) 95% = 1.58-5.41] P = 0.001], a major hepatectomy [OR = 2.6 (CI 95% = 1.48-4.76) P = 0.001], a two-stage hepatectomy [OR = 2.5 (CI 95% = 1.17-5.52) P = 0.018], the selective clamping technique [OR = 2.6 (CI 95% = 1.03-6.78) P = 0.042], R1 or R2 resection [OR = 2.6 (CI 95% = 1.52-4.64) P = 0.001] and the absence of a methylene blue test [OR = 2.6 (IC 95% = 1.43-4.65) P = 0.002] were independent risk factors of BL., Conclusion: BL remains frequent after liver resection. It has a dramatic impact on patient survival and care costs. Its incidence could be reduced by avoiding the pre-operative use of bevacizumab, avoiding selective clamping and performing a blue dye test in all resections., (© 2012 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.)

Background: In the cardiac death donor era, many reports deal with biliary tract complications and concerns about ischemic reperfusion injury owing to the exclusive arterial vascularization of the biliary tree, the warm ischemia time has been implicated as responsible for biliary lesions during organ procurement. We defined the arterialization time as the second warm ischemia time. Our purpose was to study the correlation between the arterialization time during liver implantation and the appearance of biliary lesions., Methods: We retrospectively collected data from the last 5-years of orthotopic liver transplantation: namely, indications, cold perfusion fluid, cold ischemia time, operative procedure times, and acute rejection events. We excluded split-liver transplantations, retransplantations, pediatric patients, transplantations for cholestatic disease, cases where hepatic artery thrombosis happened before biliary complications, or patients with posttransplant cytomegalovirus infection. We defined 2 groups: A) without biliary complications; and B) with biliary complications. We compared the mean arterialization time using Student t test to define whether the warm ischemic time during implantation was responsible for biliary tract complications. A P value of <.05 was considered to be significant., Results: Between 2004 and the end of 2008, we grafted 402 patients among whom 243 met the inclusion criteria: 198 in group A and 45 in group B. Only the cold ischemia time was significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .039)., Conclusion: After the anhepatic time, the surgeon may take time for the arterial anastomosis without fearing increased biliary damage., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)