Search

Objective: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the superiority of metabolic surgery (MS) over medical therapy (MT) in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, leading, to a joint statement in 2016 proposing MS to patients with class I obesity and uncontrolled glycemia. Yet, these RCTs included few patients with class I obesity (body mass index 30-35 kg/m 2 ) and even fewer patients with overweight. Our aim was to provide an updated systematic review (SR) with meta-analysis (MA) of RCTs reporting diabetes remission (DR) after MS in these patients., Research Design and Methods: We included in the SR with MA only RCTs with at least 24-month follow-up found in Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and LiSSA between January 2008 and September 2022 comparing DR post-MT versus post-MS. We calculated relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects approach to examine differences in DR between patients allocated to MS versus MT., Results: DR was significantly higher in MS versus MT after 36 months' follow-up in patients with obesity (RR = 6.65 [95 %CI 2.24;19.79]; I² = 27 %; 5 trials, 404 patients), but also specifically in patients with class I obesity (RR = 5.27 [1.31;21.23]; I² = 0 %; 4 trials, 80 patients). Furthermore, and in line with previous results, all additional MAs performed in patients with obesity in this work favor MS (specifically Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) over MT at 24, 36 (only) and 60 months of follow-up., Conclusions: Although the data available in patients with class I obesity and type 2 diabetes remains limited, MA shows higher rates of DR after MS compared with MT after 36 months' follow-up in these patients. Consequently, the French National Authority for Health French (HAS) recommends MS for these patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Medical devices are characterized notably by a wide heterogeneity (from tongue depressors to hip prostheses, and from non-implantable to invasive devices), a short life cycle with recurrent incremental innovations (from 18 months to 5 years), and an operator-dependent nature. The objective of the current round table was to develop proposals and recommendations concerning the prerequisites needed in order to meet the French health authorities expectations concerning requests for post-approval studies for medical devices, required in cases where short and long-term consequences are unknown. These studies, which are the responsibility of the manufacturer or the distributor of the medical device, are designed to confirm the role of the medical device in the therapeutic management strategy in a real-life setting. There are currently approximately 150 post-approval studies underway, mainly concerning class III devices, and the majority face difficulties implementing the study or meeting the study objectives. In light of this, the round table endeavored to clearly identify the conditions for implementation of post-approval studies specific to the characteristics of medical devices. Various areas of progress have been envisaged to improve the performance of these studies, and by consequence, the efficiency of reimbursement of medical devices by the national health insurance. These include providing manufacturers with the opportunity to better anticipate post-approval requirements, defining a study-specific primary objective, integrating a phase allowing dialogue between the manufacturer, the health authorities and the scientific committee, and increasing awareness and training of health professionals on the impact of post-approval clinical studies in terms of the reimbursement of medical devices by the national insurance., (© 2014 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

Background: The management strategies for symptomatic isolated superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) (without concomitant deep vein thrombosis [DVT] or pulmonary embolism [PE]) have yet to achieve widespread consensus. Concerns have been raised regarding the usefulness of prescribing anticoagulant treatments to all patients with isolated SVT. Determining the isolated SVT subgroups who have the highest risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence (composite of DVT, PE, and new SVT) may facilitate the identification of patients who are likely to benefit from anticoagulant treatment., Design and Methods: We performed a pooled analysis on individual data from two observational, multicenter, prospective studies, to determine predictors for VTE recurrence and their impact in an unselected population of symptomatic isolated SVT patients., Results: One thousand and seventy-four cases of symptomatic isolated SVT were followed up at 3 months. VTE recurrence was observed in 3.9% of the patients; 16.2% of the patients did not receive anticoagulants, and 0.6% experienced a VTE recurrence. Cancer, personal history of VTE and saphenofemoral/popliteal involvement significantly increased the risk of subsequent VTE or DVT/PE in univariate analyses. Only male sex significantly increased the risk of VTE or DVT/PE recurrence in multivariate analyses. Twelve percent of the patients had cancer or saphenofemoral junction involvement, and were at higher risk of DVT/PE recurrence than patients without those characteristics (4.7% vs. 1.9%, P= 0.06)., Conclusions: In patients with symptomatic SVT, only male sex significantly and independently increased the risk of VTE recurrence. Cancer or saphenofemoral junction involvement defined a population at high risk for deep VTE recurrence. Some SVTs might be safely managed without anticoagulants., (© 2012 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: The prediction of the public health impact of a preventive strategy provides valuable support for decision-making. International guidelines for hypertension management have introduced the level of absolute cardiovascular risk in the definition of the treatment target population. The public health impact of implementing such a recommendation has not been measured., Methodology/principal Findings: We assessed the efficiency of three treatment scenarios according to historical and current versions of practice guidelines on a Realistic Virtual Population representative of the French population aged from 35 to 64 years: 1) BP≥160/95 mm Hg; 2) BP≥140/90 mm Hg and 3) BP≥140/90 mm Hg plus increased CVD risk. We compared the eligibility following the ESC guidelines with the recently observed proportion of treated amongst hypertensive individuals reported by the Etude Nationale Nutrition Santé survey. Lowering the threshold to define hypertension multiplied by 2.5 the number of eligible individuals. Applying the cardiovascular risk rule reduced this number significantly: less than 1/4 of hypertensive women under 55 years and less than 1/3 of hypertensive men below 45 years of age. This was the most efficient strategy. Compared to the simulated guidelines application, men of all ages were undertreated (between 32 and 60%), as were women over 55 years (70%). By contrast, younger women were over-treated (over 200%)., Conclusion: The global CVD risk approach to decide for treatment is more efficient than the simple blood pressure level. However, lack of screening rather than guideline application seems to explain the low prescription rates among hypertensive individuals in France. Multidimensional analyses required to obtain these results are possible only through databases at the individual level: realistic virtual populations should become the gold standard for assessing the impact of public health policies at the national level.

Frequently, in data packages submitted for Marketing Approval to the CHMP, there is a lack of relevant head-to-head comparisons of medicinal products that could enable national authorities responsible for the approval of reimbursement to assess the Added Therapeutic Value (ASMR) of new clinical entities or line extensions of existing therapies.Indirect or mixed treatment comparisons (MTC) are methods stemming from the field of meta-analysis that have been designed to tackle this problem. Adjusted indirect comparisons, meta-regressions, mixed models, Bayesian network analyses pool results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), enabling a quantitative synthesis.The REAL procedure, recently developed by the HAS (French National Authority for Health), is a mixture of an MTC and effect model based on expert opinions. It is intended to translate the efficacy observed in the trials into effectiveness expected in day-to-day clinical practice in France.

Bringing all available evidence on therapy efficacy to users is a necessary step in the evidence-based medicine paradigm. Today, the needs of physicians in medical information, including therapeutic information, are not met. Further, the information reaching the doctors is rarely consistent with the available evidence. The growth rate of emerging evidence and its increasing complexity make the doctors unable to cope with it within the current medical information system. So, there is a real need to sort out a new way for transferring therapeutic information to doctors and patients. We conceived a new paradigm and designed an Internet process based on it by which unbiased evidence is brought to doctors in such a format that it can be accessed and used during the visit.

Primary Prevention: A meta-analysis of the 7 available randomized cholesterol lowering trials (2 on statins, 2 on fibrates, 2 on resins and 1 on diet) demonstrates a significant 24% relative reduction in the frequency of fatal and non-fatal coronary events, leading to a significant 14% relative reduction in coronary disease related mortality. For total mortality, the statin trials were not comparable with other treatments where there was a trend to overmortality. With the 2 statin trials, there was a nonsignificant 13% reduction in total mortality., Secondary Prevention: A meta-analysis of the 13 available randomized trials (3 with clofribrate, 1 with gemfibrozil, 2 with nicotinic acid, and 4 with diet) showed a significant 21% reduction in the frequency of fatal and non-fatal coronary events, coronary mortality and total mortality. For total mortality, only the result of the 2 statin trials was significant (-20%). BENEFICIAL EFFECT OF STATINS, ABSOLUTE VALUES: Measured as the number of patients to treat for 5 years in order to avoid 1 event (NNT), there is a clinically pertinent benefit of secondary prevention (NNT = 15 for events, NNT = 30 for coronary mortality). The absolute value is weaker when patients with minimally elevated cholesterol levels are included. For primary prevention, the absolute value is low with NNT = 44 for events and NNT = 300 for coronary mortality. In addition, as these results were obtained in trials including populations with a much higher risk than the general French population, the absolute beneficial effect may not be pertinent in France except in high-risk patients who present, in addition to a high cholesterol level, other cardiovascular risk factors.

Medical practice is most strongly founded when based on the results of well conducted clinical trials. Clinical trial results normally enter the domain of medical knowledge and practice through their publication in scientific journals. This in itself poses problems of accessibility and selection. The results of this is a slow and selective diffusion of new medical facts which has a consequent cost in human lives and human suffering. In an attempt to shorten this information path initiatives such as the Cochrane collaboration produce and maintain systematic reviews by speciality of the current state of knowledge. The ability to store a representation of a clinical trial in a standard form seems to us to be a necessary condition for the efficient and reproducible preparation of systematic reviews. Furthermore the consequent increased accessibility of research results due to the existence of the summaries would itself be of great use. In this aim a relational database client server system was developed and we publish here the results of our preliminary findings, including the data model, which we feel is an important contribution to the future discussion and development of computer based representations of clinical trial protocols and results and their use in clinical decision making.

Objectives: To study how satisfactory the contents of introductory courses in cardiovascular therapeutics, given to medical students in France, are with respect to the concepts of evidence-based medicine., Methods: Medical school lecturers were asked to provide written course material used as part of medical school courses. Best-available evidence was classified as existent (including two therapeutic subclasses: indicated and contraindicated), and nonexistent. Four scores (from 0 to 10) were given, according to conformity with best-available evidence, and citation of randomized clinical trials (RCT), meta-analyses and therapeutic objectives., Results: Thirty-four written documents were obtained from 43 faculties. Although the score (mean +/- SEM) of conformity with best-available evidence was 5.43 +/- 0.28 for the existent best-available evidence class, the corresponding scores for the citation of RCT, meta-analyses, and therapeutic objectives were, respectively, 1 +/- 0.2, 0.16 +/- 0.07, and 2.7 +/- 0.3. The four scores were highest when the best-available evidence belonged to the indicated class, intermediate when best-available evidence was nonexistent, and lowest for the contraindicated class (P < .05). These scores were significantly higher when the printed material was intended for specialists., Conclusion: Despite some limitations, the extent of agreement with the best-available evidence is only moderate. Pathophysiologic reasoning is largely preferred to justify the choice of therapeutics recommended to medical students.

Hypercholesterolemia or hypertension are continuous risk factors for coronary heart disease. When a preventive action is carried out against such a risk factor, it is necessary to specify a risk factor level value, named the treatment threshold, above which a subject should be treated. But a non-arbitrary determination of this threshold value is impossible from the epidemiological data. A method for the non-arbitrary determination of the treatment threshold value is presented, based upon mathematical modelling of the clinical and economics consequences of the prevention policy in the whole population. In a cost-effectiveness approach, the model was used to estimate the cost per coronary event prevented according to the threshold value for blood cholesterol. It was found that a minimum in this outcome proposed as the optimum treatment threshold. It is possible, from a public health point of view, to determine an optimum, non-arbitrary treatment threshold value in the prevention of coronary heart disease with cholesterol-lowering interventions. The model proposed here could be useful in decision making processes.

The APSI trial was a randomized placebo-controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of 1 year of treatment by acebutolol in high-risk patients who had survived an acute myocardial infarction. At 1 year there was a statistically significant 48% relative reduction in total mortality (p = 0.019) in favor of acebutolol. In 1995 a long-term mortality survey was undertaken through an administrative inquiry and contacts with investigators. The vital status of 586 of the 607 (96.5%) patients enrolled was known at the cutoff date and all these patients were followed up for at least 5 years. During follow-up (in-trial and post-trial period), 74 deaths (24.8%) occurred in the acebutolol group and 96 (31.1%) in the placebo group (p = 0.10). No difference between the 2 groups was observed for the number of deaths that occurred after the end of the trial: 55 deaths (19.6%) among the 281 survivors in the acebutolol group and 59 deaths (21.7%) (p = 0.70) among the 272 survivors in the placebo group. The annual hazard rate (annual death rate), calculated year by year using the actuarial method, was significantly different (p < 0.01) only for the first year and was not significantly different thereafter. Thus, the initial benefit obtained in 1 year of treatment by acebutolol lasts for 5 years.