Search

Forest decline and dieback are growing phenomena worldwide, resulting in severe, large‐scale degradation of the canopy. This can profoundly alter the provision of trophic resources and microhabitats for canopy‐dwelling arthropods.In 2019, we assessed the effect of oak decline on the community of canopy‐dwelling Hymenoptera. We selected 21 oak stands and 42 plots, located in three forests in France, presenting contrasting levels of decline. Insects were sampled at the canopy level with green multi‐funnel and flight‐interception traps.We collected a particularly diverse community of 19,289 insect individuals belonging to 918 taxa, 10 larval trophic guilds and 7 nesting guilds.Oak decline had no effect on the abundance or richness of the overall community but significantly reshaped the community assemblages. Decline had contrasting effects depending on the taxa and guilds considered. Specialist parasitoids were more abundant at intermediate levels of decline severity while generalists were negatively affected. Taxa depending on ground‐related resources and microhabitats were promoted. Saproxylic taxa were more abundant while xylophagous insects were negatively impacted.Reduced leaf area index promoted several guilds and the diversity of the overall community. While an increasing tree mortality rate enhanced the abundance and diversity of deadwood resources, it had negative impacts on several Hymenoptera guilds. Our results suggest that micro‐environmental changes at the ground level due to canopy decline have major cascading effects on the communities of canopy‐dwelling Hymenoptera.Our study highlights the relevance of studying Hymenoptera communities to investigate the outcomes of disturbances on forest biodiversity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present a data set resulting from the first round of a national monitoring program of forest reserves. It contains 9538 permanent plots, distributed across 111 study sites in mainland France (including Corsica). Notably focusing on dead wood measurement, this protocol has primarily been applied in strict forest reserves and special nature reserves (sensu Bollmann & Braunisch 2013), with 68% (6494) of the plots being currently located in strict forest reserves (unmanaged) and 24.7% (2363 plots) in forests unmanaged for at least 50 years. Sites cover a large variety of ecological conditions, from lowland to subalpine forests, but with an underrepresentation of Mediterranean forests (Table 1). The protocol assesses all the stages of a tree's life cycle, from seedling to decomposed lying dead wood. On each plot, a combination of three sampling techniques was used: (1) fixed‐area inventory for regeneration, standing dead trees, living trees, and coarse woody debris (CWD) with diameter over 30 cm; (2) transect lines for CWD with diameter <30 cm; and (3) fixed‐angle plot method for living trees with diameter at breast height (DBH) >30 cm (using a relascopic angle of 3%). Measurements include exact tree location (azimuth, distance), species, diameter(s), tree‐related microhabitats, decay stage and bark cover, and seedling cover. With ongoing climate change, the program network can also provide important information to monitor changes in forest ecosystems. It can also be used as forest management monitoring or conservation status assessment. These data are freely available for noncommercial scientific use (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 CC BY SA 4.0) with attribution, and this paper must be cited if this material is reused. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extending the network of strict forest reserves is one of the conservation measures promoted by the French National Strategy for Biodiversity. However, there is a lack of evidence concerning the efficiency of setting aside strict forest reserves to preserve biodiversity in the case of temperate forests. Moreover, there are potentially unexplored underlying ecological mechanisms that forest management could usefully mimic. In order to disentangle the respective roles of management abandonment, stand structural attributes and climatic and topographic variables in determining forest biodiversity, we conducted the first national-scale study in France comparing biodiversity in managed and in unmanaged forests. Here we focus on bryophytes (all species combined and forest specialists separately). We analyzed data from 127 plots in ten lowland forests in France. Our aim was to disentangle the relationships between bryophyte richness and (i) management abandonment per se, (ii) associated forest-structure variables like deadwood volume, and (iii) macroclimatic variables important for bryophytes (temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, solar radiation and vapor pressure deficit). For each studied combination of variables (univariate, additive or interactive models), we compared hierarchical models of several types: linear with a fixed slope, linear with a random slope, quadratic, sigmoid or threshold models. We found that deadwood variables were the main drivers of bryophyte richness in managed as well as in unmanaged stands. We observed a sigmoid relationship of total deadwood volume to overall richness, and a threshold effect of large and very large deadwood volume on forest specialist richness. The effect of management abandonment was globally non-significant, though impact varied strongly among the different forest sites. A combination of deadwood and macroclimatic variables best predicted bryophyte richness, through non-linear relationships: 1) higher solar radiation reinforced the positive effects of large deadwood on forest-specialist bryophyte richness; and 2) higher mean annual temperatures counteracted the positive effects of total deadwood amount on total bryophyte species richness. Maintaining high amounts of deadwood in both managed and unmanaged forests is likely to improve bryophyte richness and will be particularly important under ongoing climate change., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

• Forests constitute important refuge habitats for bats. • Relative activity of ten hawking bat species was analysed using acoustic surveys. • 713 point counts in 46 forests across mainland France were monitored over 6 years. • Ground deadwood cover and vegetation volume heterogeneity influenced bat activity. • Complex vegetation structures may enhance both ecosystem and bat conservation. Forests constitute one of the most important feeding and foraging habitats for bats. Because bat populations are declining, most likely due to habitat loss or fragmentation, it is imperative to understand the issues concerned with timber exploitation on bat conservation. We investigated the foraging activity of edge- and open-space foragers in relation to stand and vegetation structure, characteristics that are commonly affected by forestry. Acoustic surveys, culminating to 713 point count sites were undertaken covering 46 different forest massifs across mainland France over 6 years. We used generalized linear mixed models to analyse the activity of ten species: 6 edge-habitat and 4 open-habitat foragers. Pipistrellus pipistrellus was the most detected edge-habitat forager, while Nyctalus leisleri was the most recorded of the open-habitat foragers. Eptesicus serotinus and P. pipistrellus responded positively to heterogeneous vertical vegetation volume. In addition, P. kuhlii and P. nathusii responded negatively to tree basal area. Barbastella barbastellus , Hypsugo savii , and P. nathusii were associated with either ground deadwood and/or logging tracks and minor-traffic roads, confirming the importance of edge space. Finally, B. barbastellus, E. serotinus, and P. nathusii were positively linked to the presence of tree microhabitats. This study demonstrates that bat use in forests is complex and multifaceted. Maintaining ground deadwood and heterogeneity of vegetation, at the forest plot scale, should ensure the ecological functioning of exploited forest systems and the conservation of edge- and open-habitat foraging bats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past centuries in Western Europe, the long history of forest management has shaped both landscape- and local-scale forest structures. In France, a network of strict forest reserves was created in the 1950s to serve as a reference for nature conservation and forest dynamics. However, few studies to date have quantitatively compared the structural characteristics between managed stands and the reserves, where management has been (more or less recently) abandoned. In addition, the time needed for old-growth characteristics to restore themselves in strict forest reserves remains poorly known. We analysed the differences in stand characteristics between managed and unmanaged stands in 17 French forests (233 plots) located in both lowland and in mountainous regions. We quantitatively showed that overall basal area, very large trees and deadwood features were significantly higher in unmanaged forests, though this pattern was mainly found in the lowland forests while in mountainous regions, managed and unmanaged forests showed far fewer differences. In addition, most structural characteristics that were higher in unmanaged forests also increased with the time since last harvesting. Compared to the remaining old-growth forests elsewhere in Europe, the strict forest reserves in France often appear less mature, since they are still recovering from centuries of intensive management. Our results also show lower levels than those observed in other European studies on the restoration of old-growth characteristics over time; this indicates that it will take French reserves a very long time to reach values comparable to old-growth references in Europe. Our study constitutes one of the first references on unmanaged forests in France and may serve practitioners in their everyday management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]