Search

Background ATLANTIC was a randomized study comparing pre- and in-hospital treatment with a ticagrelor loading dose (LD) in ongoing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes in France with other countries participating in ATLANTIC. Methods The population comprised 1862 patients, 660 (35.4%) from France and 1202 from 12 other countries. The main endpoints were reperfusion (≥ 70% ST-segment elevation resolution) and TIMI flow grade 3 before (co-primary endpoints) and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Other endpoints included a composite ischaemic endpoint (death/myocardial infarction/stroke/urgent revascularization/definite stent thrombosis) and bleeding events at 30 days. Results In France, median times from first LD to angiography and between first and second LDs were 49 and 35 min, respectively, and were similar to other countries. French patients were younger (mean 58.7 vs 61.9 years, p < 0.0001) and characterized by a higher rate of radial access (89.9% vs 54.8%, p < 0.0001), more frequent use of pre-hospital glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors (14.1% vs 3.1%, p < 0.0001) and intravenous enoxaparin (57.3% vs 10.1%, p < 0.0001). In France, as in other countries, the co-primary endpoints did not differ between the two randomization groups. The composite ischaemic endpoint was numerically lower in France (3.3% vs 5.1%, p = 0.07), with a lower mortality (1.4% vs 3.3%, p = 0.01). PLATO major bleeding was numerically less frequent in France (1.8% vs 3.2%, p = 0.07). Conclusions The French population appears to have better outcomes than the rest of the study population, and seems related to differences in demographics and management characteristics. Trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01347580 ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the overall neutral results of the GLOBAL-LEADERS trial, results from a prespecified subgroup analysis showed that patients from Western Europe had a significantly lower rate of the primary endpoint when treated with ticagrelor monotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to examine the regional disparities in patients' baseline characteristics and their response to ticagrelor monotherapy., Methods: Patients' baseline characteristics and the treatment effects of ticagrelor combined with aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23-months versus 12-months of standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) were compared according to participating countries. The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction at two years., Results: Significant variances in patients' baseline characteristics were found between participating countries. The primary endpoint varied significantly according to the country (P interaction  = 0.027). Patients from France (1.6% versus 5.2%, HR: 0.31, 95%CI: 0.13-0.73) and The Netherlands (2.4% versus 4.8%, HR, 0.50, 95%CI: 0.26-0.94) had lower rates of the primary endpoint when allocated to ticagrelor monotherapy, compared with the standard DAPT regimen. Of the 26 baseline and post-randomization factors explored, variance in the rate of complex PCI between countries was identified as the top contributor to this regional interaction., Conclusions: Patients' baseline characteristics varied between participating countries in the GLOBAL-LEADERS trial. There is a significant regional variance in the treatment effect of ticagrelor monotherapy, which could partly be explained by the differences in complex PCI being performed., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01813435)., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We compared safety and efficacy outcomes of 3 limus-based drug-eluting stents in the 'all-comers' PROENCY (PROmus/ENdeavor/CYpher) registry., Background: Limited data are available on head-to-head comparisons of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) or the sirolimus- eluting stent (SES) in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease., Methods: PROENCY was a prospective, open-label, multicenter, observational study including consecutive patients undergoing planned treatment with EES, ZES, or SES. Seventeen centers were designated to place an EES or SES, 14 other centers were designated to place EES or ZES. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months. Unadjusted and propensity-adjusted outcomes were compared between groups., Results: A total of 1921 patients were enrolled in the study from February to December 2008, of which 1704 patients received only study stents and were analyzed. At 12 months, the unadjusted major adverse event rate was significantly lower in the EES group versus the ZES group (3.1% vs 8.7%; P=.001) and the SES group (5.2% vs 9.6%; P=.01). This was mainly driven by lower TVR rates [2.6% with EES vs 8.2% with ZES [P<.001] and 4.1% with EES vs 7.0% with SES [P=.05]. Stent thrombosis rates were low and comparable. Adjusted analyses confirmed the unadjusted results., Conclusion: There were no differences in safety outcomes of EES, ZES, and SES at 12 months in PROENCY. However, differences in efficacy were observed between the 3 "limus"-based stents in a real-world patient population.