Search

The last two decades have seen fast-moving and wholescale changes in the ways that education is now provided in French schools, in the nature of learner assessment, and in the form and scale of system evaluation. Innovation and reform have in part followed international trends, themselves triggered by the global impact of the international attainment surveys, and are in part a response to growing economic pressures, EU initiatives and increasingly burdensome examination logistics. One of the most recent reforms, and arguably the most dramatic, concerns the iconic 'academic' "baccalauréat," which sees a reduced subject profile for formal examination and the new addition of teacher assessment to complement examination achievements. The most ambitious innovations are arguably those introduced into the newest form of accountability-focused system monitoring. The article overviews these innovations and reforms, along with the motivations that led up to them, and briefly reflects on potential future consequences, both expected and unintended.

Background: PISA results appear to have a large impact upon government policy. The phenomenon is growing, with more countries taking part in PISA testing and politicians pointing to PISA results as reasons for their reforms. Purpose: The aims of this research were to depict the policy reactions to PISA across a number of jurisdictions, to see whether they exhibited similar patterns and whether the same reforms were evident. Sources of evidence: We investigated policy and media reactions to the 2009 and 2012 PISA results in six cases: Canada, China (Shanghai), England, France, Norway and Switzerland. Cases were selected to contrast high-performing jurisdictions (Canada, China) with average performers (England, France, Norway and Switzerland). Countries that had already been well reported on in the literature were excluded (Finland, Germany). Design and methods: Policy documents, media reports and academic articles in English, French, Mandarin and Norwegian relating to each of the cases were critically evaluated. Results: A policy reaction of "scandalisation" was evident in four of the six cases; a technique used to motivate change. Five of the six cases showed "standards-based reforms" and two had reforms in line with the "ideal-governance" model. However, these are categorisations: the actual reforms had significant differences across countries. There are chronological problems with the notion that PISA results were causal with regard to policy in some instances. Countries with similar PISA results responded with different policies, reflecting their differing cultural and historical education system trajectories. Conclusions: The connection between PISA results and policy is not always obvious. The supranational spell of PISA in policy is in the way that PISA results are used as a magic wand in political rhetoric, as though they conjure particular policy choices. This serves as a distraction from the ideological basis for reforms. The same PISA results could motivate a range of different policy solutions.