Search

Background: People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) including stroke, yet existing real-world evidence (RWE) on the clinical and economic burden of stroke in this population is limited. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the clinical and economic burden of stroke among people with T2D in France. Methods: We conducted a retrospective RWE study using data from the nationally representative subset of the French Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS) database. We assessed the incidence of stroke requiring hospitalization between 2012 and 2018 among T2D patients. Subsequent clinical outcomes including CVD, stroke recurrence, and mortality were estimated overall and according to stroke subtype (ischemic versus hemorrhagic). We also examined the treatment patterns for glucose-lowering agents and CVD agents, health care resource utilization and medical costs. Results: Among 45,331 people with T2D without baseline history of stroke, 2090 (4.6%) had an incident stroke requiring hospitalization. The incidence of ischemic stroke per 1000 person-years was 4.9-times higher than hemorrhagic stroke (6.80 [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.47–7.15] versus 1.38 [1.24–1.54]). During a median follow-up of 2.4 years (interquartile range 0.6; 4.4) from date of index stroke, the rate of CVD, stroke recurrence and mortality per 1000 person-years was higher among hemorrhagic stroke patients than ischemic stroke patients (CVD 130.9 [107.7–159.0] versus 126.4 [117.2–136.4]; stroke recurrence: 86.7 [66.4–113.4] versus 66.5 [59.2–74.6]; mortality 291.5 [259.1–327.9] versus 144.1 [134.3–154.6]). These differences were not statistically significant, except for mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.95 [95% CI 1.66–2.92]). The proportion of patients prescribed glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists increased from 4.2% at baseline to 6.6% during follow-up. The proportion of patients prescribed antihypertensives and statins only increased slightly following incident stroke (antihypertensives: 70.9% pre-stroke versus 76.7% post-stroke; statins: 24.1% pre-stroke versus 30.0% post-stroke). Overall, 68.8% of patients had a subsequent hospitalization. Median total medical costs were €12,199 (6846; 22,378). Conclusions: The high burden of stroke among people with T2D, along with the low proportion of patients receiving recommended treatments as per clinical guidelines, necessitates a strengthened and multidisciplinary approach to the CVD prevention and management in people with T2D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and often fatal complication in cancer patients. The initial treatment for VTE in cancer patients is typically low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), a type of anticoagulant that prevents VTE from recurring. However, information on outcomes of LMWH treatment in cancer patients with VTE have not typically been collected from large national databases, such as the one in France. The aim of this study was to assess VTE recurrence, bleeding (a common side effect of anticoagulant treatment), and all-cause mortality in cancer patients in France who were prescribed LMWH for VTE in 2013–2018. Our results indicate that cancer patients who experience VTE have unmet medical needs due to high rates of mortality, VTE recurrence, and bleeding after LMWH treatment initiation. Our study may help further research on outcomes in cancer patients with VTE who receive the next generation of therapy, direct oral anticoagulants. Patients with cancer have an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) and an increased risk of death from VTE. Until recently, the standard of care for treatment of VTE in cancer patients was low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). To determine treatment patterns and outcomes, we performed an observational study using a nationwide health database. Treatment patterns, rates of bleeding, and VTE recurrence at 6 and 12 months were assessed in cancer patients with VTE in France prescribed LMWH in 2013–2018. Of 31,771 patients administered LMWH (mean age 66.3 years), 51.0% were male, 58.7% had pulmonary embolism, and 70.9% had metastatic disease. At 6 months LMWH persistence was 81.6%, VTE recurrence had occurred in 1256 patients (4.0%) at a crude rate per 100 person-months (PM) of 0.90, and bleeding had occurred in 1124 patients (3.5%) at a crude rate per 100 PM of 0.81. At 12 months, VTE recurrence had occurred in 1546 patients (4.9%) at a crude rate per 100 PM of 0.71 and bleeding had occurred in 1438 patients (4.5%) at a crude rate per 100 PM of 0.66. Overall, VTE-related clinical event rates were high among patients administered LMWH, suggesting an unmet medical need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past decade, several drugs have been approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This retrospective study, using the French National Healthcare database (SNDS), describes the treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with RRMM treated in real-world clinical practice in France. Patients were adults, with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma, who initiated second-line (2L) treatment approved for use in France between 2014 and 2018; this included bortezomib, carfilzomib, daratumumab, ixazomib, lenalidomide, or pomalidomide. Data were analyzed overall, by first-line (1L) autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) status and by lenalidomide treatment status at 2L. In total, 12987 patients with RRMM were included in the study (mean age 69.5 years); 27% received an ASCT at 1L, and 30% received a lenalidomide-sparing regimen at 2L. Overall, and among the ASCT and non-ASCT subgroups, most patients received a bortezomib-based regimen at 1L, whereas lenalidomide-based regimens were most common at 2L. Among patients who received a lenalidomide-sparing regimen at 2L, this was most often a proteasome inhibitor-based regimen. Mortality rate was 26.1/100 person-years, and median (95% confidence interval) survival from 2L initiation was 32.4 (31.2-33.6) months. Survival differed by various factors, shorter survival was reported in the non-ASCT group, those receiving a lenalidomide-sparing regimen at 2L, older patients (≥ 70 years), and those with multiple comorbidities. This analysis provides insight into the real-world use of approved novel MM treatments and highlights an ongoing unmet need to improve outcomes, particularly for selected patient groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite dyslipidaemia management guidelines, many patients do not reach low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets due to insufficiently intensive regimens or lack of adherence to their medication. This was a retrospective cohort study on the Pharmacoepidemiologic General Research eXtension (PGRx)-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) registry. Patients included were ≥ 18 years old who suffered an ACS between 2013 and 2016, and treated with lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) at hospital discharge or within 92 days. Patients were followed up to 12 months' post index ACS, a new cardiovascular event, loss to follow-up or death. Treatment intensity (high, moderate and low intensity statins ± ezetimibe) and adherence (proportion of days covered > 80%) are described. A total of 2,695 patients were included; mean age [SD] was 63.1 [12.8] years, and 77% were men. High, moderate and low intensity statins were started in 56% (1,520), 36% (971), and 3% (86) of patients, respectively. A further 2% (46) were on statin/ezetimibe combination, 2% (42) on other LLT and 1% (30) on ezetimibe alone. At follow-up, around 70% of patients were adherent to LLT, with those on moderate intensity treatments showing better adherence (76%) than those on low (63%) or high (67%) intensity treatments. Despite guideline recommendations, many patients following an ACS are not treated with high intensity statins, and adherence remains far from optimal. Effort should be made to increase the proportion of patients treated with high intensity statins following an ACS and to further improve treatment adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients at risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) is affected by both intensity and adherence. Our study evaluated the association between LLT intensity (statin and/or ezetimibe) and adherence, and CV events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) in France. Using the French national healthcare database (SNDS), we included patients with a history of MI, an initial LLT prescription in 2011–2013, and a second prescription within one year. LLT intensity was defined using the expected percent reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between intensity and/or adherence, and the risk of major adverse CV event (MACE). 164,565 patients were included; mean (SD) age, 66·3 (13·8) years; 73·6% men. Following an MI, only half of patients were treated with high-intensity LLT and approximately 40% of those on LLT remained non-adherent during follow-up (mean (SD) follow-up, 2·6 (1·4) years). Each 10% increase in treatment intensity, adherence, or adherence-adjusted intensity was respectively associated with a 16% (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.84–0.85), 7% (HR 0.93, 95%CI 0.93–0.94), and 15% (HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.84–0.86) decrease in the risk of MACE. Among patients with a history of MI, prescriptions of high-intensity LLT were limited and adherence to LLT was low. Higher intensity and/or adherence to statins was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE, highlighting the importance of compliance with clinical guidelines to improve patient outcomes. • Real world study of 164,565 post-myocardial infarction patients. • Higher LLT intensity and/or adherence associated with a lower risk of MACE. • Impact of increasing compliance, maintaining LLT intensity and improving adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Evidence on the real effectiveness of statins on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) incidence is scarce. We assessed the effectiveness of real-life statins on the risk of first non-fatal ACS in a low-cardiovascular-risk country. Methods: Systematic case–control study was conducted in 60 cardiology centres and 371 general practices from across France. A total of 2238 cases with first ACS within 1month from recruitment and 2238 controls without history of ACS were included; controls were matched to ACS cases on sex, age, frequency of visits to GPs, date of recruitment and personal history of chronic diseases. Statin exposure and risk factors were documented through patient telephone interviews and validated against medical records. The index date was the date of ACS for cases. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) of first ACS and statin use were estimated by multiple conditional logistic regression models controlled for risk factors and propensity score for statin exposure. Results: Statin use was associated with lower ACS risk, with an adjusted matched OR of 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56 to 0.79 for current use (within 2months) and 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.86 for any use within 24months [atorvastatin: 0.83 (0.63–1.10), fluvastatin: 0.75 (0.43–1.30), pravastatin: 0.98 (0.72–1.34), rosuvastatin: 0.49 (0.35–0.68) and simvastatin: 0.62 (0.46–0.84)]. The preventive effect of statins on non-fatal ACS reached its maximum after one to four years of use. Conclusion: A similar magnitude of effect for statin use was observed in real life, as compared to randomised clinical trials in France. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Risk factors and comorbidities can complicate management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. We describe and compare real-world safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in subgroups of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at high risk for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, utilizing data from a national quasi-exhaustive French database., Methods: Anticoagulant-naïve adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with ≥1 gastrointestinal bleeding risk factor, initiating anticoagulant treatment January 2016-December 2019, and covered by the French national health data system were eligible. The following subgroups were evaluated: patients age ≥75 years, receiving concomitant medications, HAS-BLED score ≥3, and chronic kidney disease stage 3-4. Outcomes included major bleeding and stroke/systemic embolism. Patient characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching., Results: A total of 314,184 patients were identified; characteristics were similar for propensity score-matched subgroups in VKA/DOAC and DOAC/DOAC comparisons. DOACs showed lower risk of major bleeding versus VKAs in all subgroups evaluated (p<0.0001 for all). Apixaban showed lower risk of major bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding versus rivaroxaban in all subgroups (p≤0.05 for all) and versus dabigatran in elderly patients, patients with HAS-BLED score ≥3, and those receiving concomitant medications (p<0.05 for all). Stroke/systemic embolism risk was lower with apixaban versus rivaroxaban in elderly patients, those with HAS-BLED ≥3, and those receiving concomitant medications; risks were similar for other comparisons., Conclusions: DOACs were associated with improved safety and effectiveness when compared to VKAs among subgroups of non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients at high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Apixaban was associated with lower risks of major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and stroke/systemic embolism versus rivaroxaban as well as lower risk of major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding bleed and similar risk of stroke/systemic embolism versus dabigatran among several of these patient subgroups., Competing Interests: This was a BMS/Pfizer sponsored study. GYHL reported serving as a consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Anthos outside the submitted work. No fees are received personally. GYHL is a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator and co-principal investigator of the AFFIRMO project on multimorbidity in AF, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 899871. RB reported serving as a consultant for Alfasigma, Medtronic, Falk, Mayoli and Pfizer. ACM reported serving as a consultant and speaker for Abbott, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and received research grant from BMS/Pfizer. GP, GG, AK and NQ are employees of Certara, who were paid consultants to Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb in connection with the conduct of this study. FD, FS, JC, RS and RM are employees and shareholders of Pfizer. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2025 Lip et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: This observational study compared effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at high risk for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB)., Methods: Anticoagulant-naïve adults with NVAF with ≥1 GIB risk factor, initiating anticoagulant treatment January 2016-December 2019, and covered by the French national health data system were eligible. Outcomes included major bleeding (MB) and stroke/systemic embolism (SE). Patient characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching., Results: A total of 314,184 patients were identified with 162,150 (51.5%) in the apixaban cohort, 88,427 (28.1%) in the rivaroxaban cohort, 16,465 (5.2%) in the dabigatran cohort, and 47,142 (15.0%) in the VKA cohort (mean age 79.0 years, standard deviation 10.5; 51.0% female). A total of 45,124 apixaban-VKAs, 38,737 rivaroxaban-VKAs, 16,415 dabigatran-VKAs, 88,414 apixaban-rivaroxaban, 16,464 apixaban-dabigatran, and 16,459 rivaroxaban-dabigatran pairs were retained after propensity score matching. Apixaban had lower risk of MB versus dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.83) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59-0.66). Apixaban had lower risk of GIB versus dabigatran (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.56) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.49-0.59). Risk of GIB was similar with dabigatran versus rivaroxaban (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.89-1.24). Apixaban had lower risk of stroke/SE versus rivaroxaban (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96), while risk was similar versus dabigatran (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3). All DOACs had lower risk of MB and stroke/SE versus VKAs (p<0.001 for all)., Conclusions: DOACs had improved safety and effectiveness from bleeding and stroke/SE, respectively, versus VKAs among patients with NVAF at high risk for GIB. Apixaban was associated with lower MB and GIB risk versus other DOACs. For stroke/SE, apixaban was associated with reduced risk versus rivaroxaban and similar risk versus dabigatran., Competing Interests: GYHL reported serving as a consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Anthos outside the submitted work. No fees are received personally. GYHL is a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator and co-principal investigator of the AFFIRMO project on multimorbidity in AF, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 899871. RB reported serving as a consultant for Alfasigma, Medtronic, Falk, Mayoli and Pfizer. ACM reported serving as a consultant and speaker for Abbott, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and received research grant from BMS/Pfizer. GP, GG, AK and NQ are employees of Certara, who were paid consultants to Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb in connection with the conduct of this study. FD, FS, JC, RS and RM are employees and shareholders of Pfizer. We confirm that this does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2024 Lip et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)