Search

Abstract: A rare blood group is usually defined as the absence of a high prevalence antigen or the absence of several antigens within a single blood group system, if its prevalence in France is 4/1000 or less in the general population. An individual with a rare blood phenotype can develop a naturally-occurring or immune antibody corresponding to his rare specificity. In case an extremely low stock of compatible blood is available at the national level, a so-called “transfusion deadlock” is described. Most of the individuals with a rare blood group are coincidently identified when a routine pretransfusion testing or pregnancy follow-up is performed, if the antibody(ies) corresponding to the rare specificity is(are) present. Other individuals are discovered following a systematic red cell typing, or family investigations in siblings. One hundred and twenty-one rare blood specificities and 42 rare blood genotypes are currently defined at the French National Reference Laboratory for Blood Groups (CNRGS–Paris). The French national registry of individuals with a rare blood phenotype/genotype includes about 9600 people, who are urged to regularly donate blood for the National Rare Blood Bank. This bank, based on a homologous blood transfusion program, is in charge of the long-term storage of rare frozen blood units, that can only be delivered after receiving authorization from the CNRGS. The global and individual care management of the individuals with a rare blood group, concerning potentially several hundred thousand people in France, requires a close cooperation between all the protagonists within the transfusion chain. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Aim of the study: Determination of blood group antigens from data obtained by using molecular methods (genotyping) has become an indispensable tool in the specialized immunohematology laboratories. The French National Reference Centre for Blood group typing (CNRGS) routinely performs genotyping of the FY, JK and MNS system (common genotyping), providing a phenotype deduced from genotyping data for FY1, FY2, JK1, JK2, MNS3 and MNS4 antigens. Patients and methods: We performed a study to evaluate the common genotyping prescriptions referred to the CNRGS over the last three years. Results: Between February2006 and February2009, the CNRGS performed 2392 genotyping, including 981 common genotyping. Analysis of 172 common genotyping performed in 2008 showed that 63.8% of the prescriptions expressed a genotyping demand. Of the latter, 42.7% were genotyping prescriptions only, whereas 57.2% were prescriptions of genotyping associated with alloantibody identification. All prescriptions refer to blood group genotyping indications issued from guidelines, with no incorrect prescription, that are patients transfused within four months before blood sampling in 63.6% of cases or a positive direct antiglobulin test in 24.5% of cases. Lastly, 36% of the blood samples referred to the CNRGS had no genotyping prescription. Yet, common genotyping was performed by the CNRGS to get complete immunohematology data for antibody identification. Conclusion: Usefulness of blood group genotyping in specialized immunohematology laboratories is obvious. However, the strategy for implementation of molecular methods remains to be defined. Use of high-throughput DNA analysis should change our way of working. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The use of blood group genotyping for the prediction of antigen expression has been discussed in clinical transfusion settings, but much less for reagent red blood cells selection. In France, the Centre National de Référence pour les Groupes Sanguins (CNRGS) produces a reference panel of reagent red blood cells, mainly used for red cell antibody identification. The use of high-throughput DNA analysis has never been applied to blood donors whose red blood cells are used as reagents. The aim of this study was to compare the serological phenotype and that predicted from DNA analysis in such donors, and to determine the benefit of DNA analysis in reagent red blood cells selection strategy., Study Design and Method: Red blood cells of 346 blood donors were typed with two different reagents for each antigen. The genotyping was performed by using HEA v1.2 BeadChips, BioArray Solutions, Immucor. The comparison between the serologically determined phenotype and that predicted from DNA analysis held on 8876 paired results obtained from 10 blood group systems and 25 antigens., Results: A 99.95% concordance was observed. Four cases of discrepancy for RH, KEL, LU and DO blood group systems were analyzed. Genotyping precisions were of special interest for the Duffy blood group system., Conclusion: Systematic DNA analysis brings important information on reagent red blood cells selection. It can be used at a routine level. Especially, the notion of "antigen of double dose" which is specified in several countries by government bodies should evolve regarding data obtained from DNA analysis. This should improve the quality of reagent red blood cells as first step for antibody identification., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The technology allowing freezing of RBC units has been available for many decades. The high-glycerol method for RBC storage at -8 degrees C is predominantly used. Several studies have shown satisfactory results regarding the in vitro viability and function of cryopreserved RBCs. RBC freezing is nowadays mostly encountered in rare blood programs and military deployments. Preservation time of frozen RBCs appears to be virtually indefinite, but most countries apply a 10-year outdate. There is no mandatory time restriction in France. The National Rare Blood Bank currently includes 962 (17.5%) RBC units aged to years or more and 153 (2.8%) aged 20 years or more. Since 1994, 1957 RBC units have been thawed and transfused, among which 118 were aged 10 years or more and 8 were aged 20 years or more. Discarding RBC units older than to years may be highly sensitive for very rare blood groups, e.g., U-, of which approximately 30 percent of the cryopreserved units are aged to years or more. However, the lack of nucleic acid testing for HIV and HCV may be problematic for old RBC units drawn from donors who were not subsequently tested for these markers, which is now mandatory in most countries. Regarding the 118 transfused RBC units older than 10 years, no evidence of hemolysis of thawed RBCs and no transfusion reaction, clinical or biologic hemolysis, or transfusion ineffectiveness was reported, either by any of the parties involved in the transfusion supply of rare RBC units or through the French hemovigilance program, which requires a mandatory report of any transfusion reaction. It has recently been suggested to extend the 10-year restriction in some countries. Considering our experience and observational data, we may consider it safe and efficient to transfuse rare frozen RBC units older than 10 years. An international consensus for RBC cryopreservation time should ideally be established.

The French reference laboratory for rare blood groups (CNRGS) is working for all participants of the transfusion chain: from the donors to the recipients; from the French Establishment for Blood to medical laboratories; from hospital to the haemovigilance network; from governmental agencies to European structures. This laboratory is in charge of: (1) studies of complex problems of immunohaematology; (2) studies of rare blood group phenotypes; (3) reagents quality controls; (4) production of biological standards; (5) specific specimen banks; (6) molecular studies of blood group antigens and antibodies involved; (8) panels of reference cells or DNA; (9) international exchanges.

Six unrelated individuals of Afro-Caribbean origin, whose red cells have a marked reduction of the Rhe antigen expression, have been identified. All exhibited the same serological profile with anti-e monoclonal antibodies and lacked expression of the high frequency e-related antigen hrS. Transcripts and genomic analysis showed that these phenotypes resulted from the presence of two new RHCE alleles, ceMO and cEMI. The ceMO allele corresponded to a RHce gene carrying a G667T mutation (exon 5) and was detected at the homozygous state in sample 1 and at the heterozygous state in samples 2-6. The G667T mutation resulted in a Val223Phe substitution on the Rhce polypeptide, in close proximity to Ala226 (e-antigen polymorphism), which might account for the altered expression of e. The ceMO allele is also associated with the lack of expression of the hrS antigen. The absence of the hrS antigen expression may have implications in transfusion as hrS-negative individuals may develop clinically significant antibodies. The cEMI allele corresponded to a silent RHE allele carrying a nine nucleotide deletion within exon 3 and was detected at the heterozygous state in sample 2. This deletion resulted in a shortened polypeptide of 414 residues (instead of 417) that was absent (or severely reduced) at the red cell surface, as the E antigen was undetectable using serology and Western blot analysis with anti-E reagents. In DNA-based polymerase chain reaction genotyping for RHE determination, the cEMI allele provided a false positive result as the cells carrying this allele are serologically phenotyped as E-negative. The incidence of this allele in the Black population is unknown but, as shown already for D genotyping, one must exercise caution when genotyping is performed to detect the e/E polymorphism.

The reagents used for blood group analyses are subject in France to the same regulations as other reagents. A file must be submitted for each reagent to the Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé. Furthermore, each production lot must be checked by the Centre national de référence pour les groupes sanguins (CNRGS) for control before marketing. These controls allow a comparative quality assessment of the reagents. The investigation by the CNRGS of the problems encountered in the every day use of these products makes this quality control even more accurate.

The national reference Center for blood groups checked samples of reagents and devices used in France for a definitive verification of pretransfusion ABO tests performed at the patient's bedside, as defined by French health authority regulations. The results of an initial inquiry was published in 1991. The new study shows no significant improvement of the quality of reagents and devices. This is a major concern considering the importance of ABO incompatibility in severe hemolytic transfusion reactions.

Until the '80s blood group reagents were composed of human or animal polyclonal antibodies; nowadays they are mainly produced from monoclonal antibodies. In this paper two aspects will be considered; firstly the evolution in the use of monoclonal reagents in France and secondly the quality of these new reagents in comparison with polyclonal reagents. From 1981 to 1995, 17567 batches of blood group reagents were analyzed and controlled by the French Blood Group Reference Laboratory (CNRGS). All data are given in six tables.

Erythrocyte blood group-reference laboratory activities have to develop in accordance with new scientific knowledge brought by molecular biology. Reference laboratories will have to use immunology as well as molecular biology for a long time yet; both approaches are complementary. Recombinant cells expressing specific antigens will thus be used in parallel to red blood cells with selected phenotype combinations. To be efficient, Reference laboratory activities must be performed together with research and education activities with a view to spreading knowledge within a national network.

The red blood cells and sera from 21 RN/RN individuals were studied. The study confirmed the Rh type D+C+E-c-e+, CW-, characterized by an increased expression of the D antigen, a markedly decreased expression of the C and e antigens, the presence of a low incidence antigen (Rh32) and the absence of a high incidence antigen (Rh46) associated with an epitope recognized by a murine monoclonal antibody (MR 432). Four individuals exposed to Rh46 cells by pregnancy and/or transfusion had an anti-Rh46 antibody. This antibody gave positive reactions with all red blood cells of common and rare Rh phenotype except Rh null, D--, D.., DC(W-) and RN/RN cells. This antibody is considered to be of clinical significance in case of transfusion or pregnancy.