Search

Background: Chest injuries are associated with mortality among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and require multimodal pain management strategies, including regional anesthesia (RA). We conducted a survey to determine the current practices of physicians working in ICUs regarding RA for the management of chest trauma in patients with multiple traumas., Methods: An online questionnaire was sent to medical doctors (n = 1230) working in French ICUs, using the Société Française d'Anesthésie Réanimation (SFAR) mailing list of its members. The questionnaire addressed 3 categories: general characteristics, practical aspects of RA, and indications and contraindications., Results: Among the 333 respondents (response rate = 27%), 78% and 40% of 156 respondents declared that they would consider using thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and thoracic paravertebral blockade (TPB), respectively. The main benefits declared for performing RA were the ability to have effective analgesia, a more effective cough, and early rehabilitation. For 70% of the respondents, trauma patients with a theoretical indication of RA did not receive TEA or TPB for the following reasons: the ICU had no experience of RA (62%), no anesthesiologist-intensivist working in the ICU (46%), contraindications (27%), ignorance of the SFAR guidelines (19%), and no RA protocol available (13%). In this survey, 95% of the respondents thought the prognosis of trauma patients could be influenced by the use of RA., Conclusions: While TEA and TPB are underused because of several limitations related to the patterns of injuries in multitrauma patients, lack of both experience and confidence in combination with the absence of available protocols appear to be the major restraining factors, even if physicians are aware that patients' outcomes could be improved by RA. These results suggest the need to strengthen initial training and provide continuing education about RA in the ICU., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 International Anesthesia Research Society.)

Objectives: There has been an increase in the number of visits by older individuals to emergency departments (EDs). The primary cause of this is trauma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal changes in the use of EDs by older individuals for traumatic injuries, characterize their trauma, and specify the mode of transport to the ED according to their place of residence (community-dwelling or nursing home resident)., Design: A monocentric, retrospective study of patients over 65 years of age, admitted to University Center Hospital ED for trauma between 2013 and 2017., Participants: In total, 20,741 patients were included., Results: The mean age was 81.8 years (standard deviation 9.1 years); 11,879 (57.3%) patients were community-living with family, 5077 (24.5%) were nursing home (NH) residents, and 3785 (18.22%) patients were community-dwelling living alone. Overall, 33.3% of the NH residents were transferred during the weekend compared with 28.04% of the community-dwelling individuals (P < .001). Ten percent (1577 patients) of the community-dwelling individuals compared with 21.8% (1109 patients) of the transfers of NH residents to ED occurred late at night (P < .001). The primary reason for use of the ED was head trauma (32.0%), followed by cutaneo-mucous wounds (28.7 %) and limb fractures (25.9%). In most cases, NH residents were transferred by ambulance (5000 residents; 98.4%), compared with community-dwelling individuals (11,118; 70.1%; P < .001). Overall, 7459 (36.0 %) patients were hospitalized., Conclusion and Implications: In comparison with community-dwelling individuals, ED transfers of NH residents in the context of trauma-related emergency were higher during after-hour periods, lengthes of stay at the ED were longer, and residents were admitted less to the in hospital., (Copyright © 2019 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: French military physicians serving in deployment are confronted with pediatric polytrauma patients (PPP) during the provision of medical aid to civilian populations. The objectives of this study were to describe the current care of PPPs during these missions, to report difficulties encountered and to evaluate the training of doctors for management of PPPs in the field., Methods: A descriptive epidemiological study based on a questionnaire sent to physicians who had been deployed overseas., Results: 91 doctors participated. Their mean age was 35 years. 86% of the doctors managed children whilst serving overseas, of which 54% were PPPs. The incidence of pediatric polytrauma varied according to the country, but overall from 1129 emergencies reported during overseas missions, 11% were PPPs. Penetrating traumas represented 37% of cases; 24% were circulatory distress and 19% were massive bleeding. 80% of the doctors reported a lack of pediatric trauma experience, less than 5% had received appropriate in-service training and only 9% had worked in pediatric emergency facilities in France. The equipment available for PPPs in the field was often poorly understood and frequently considered to be insufficient., Conclusions: The occurrence of PPPs of war is rare and complex, but care of older children it is similar to that required for adults. Preparation for PPP management, it could be optimized by identifying risks which alter depending on the country of deployment, such as the logistical organization of the battlefield chain of care. Improvements in doctors' pediatric trauma training should be individualized, based on their mission needs., Level of Evidence: III.

Background: Early transfusion of high ratio of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and red blood cells (RBC) is associated with mortality reduction. However, time to reach high ratio is limited by the need to thaw the FFP. French lyophilized plasma (FLYP) used by French army and available in military teaching hospital does not need to be thawed and is immediately available. We hypothesize that the use of FLYP may reduce time to reach a plasma/RBC ratio of 1:1., Methods: A retrospective study performed in a Level 1 trauma center between January 2012 and December 2015. Severe trauma patients who received 2 U of RBC in the emergency room were included and assigned to two groups according to first plasma transfused: FLYP group and FFP group., Results: Forty-three severe trauma patients in the FLYP group and 29 in the FFP group were included. The time until first plasma transfusion was shorter in the FLYP group than in the FFP group, respectively 15 min (10-25) versus 95 min (70-145) (p < 0.0001). Time until a 1:1 ratio was shorter in the FLYP group than in the FFP group. There were significantly fewer cases of massive transfusion in the FLYP group than in the FFP group with respectively 7% vs. 45% (p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: The use of FLYP provided significantly faster plasma transfusions than the use of FFP as well as a plasma and RBC ratio superior to 1:2 that was reached more rapidly in severe trauma patients. These results may explain the less frequent need for massive transfusion in the patients who received FLYP. These positive results should be confirmed by a prospective and randomized evaluation., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, level IV.

Purpose: In August 2012, the Zaatari refugee camp was opened in Jordan under the auspices of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. France deployed there a surgical facility to treat victims of war trauma., Methods: After a phase of intensive care and resuscitation, surgical management meeting the current standards of war surgery was conducted. Then, patients were transferred to a Jordanian civilian hospital or stayed in the Zaatari camp. A retrospective analysis of patient data was performed., Results: From January to March 2013, 95 patients were managed: 85% of patients were male with a median age of 27 years (4-65); 5% of patients were <18 years of age. All patients were Syrian, civilian or members of the "Free Syrian Army." Penetrating trauma accounted for 95% of lesions. A total of 105 surgeries were performed, including: 33 external fixators, 8 laparotomies, 8 nerve repairs, 6 cover flaps, 4 direct arterial repairs, 2 reversed saphenous vein bypass grafts, and 1 amputation. The median length of stay on the wards was 3.71 days; 43% of patients were transferred to Jordanian civilian hospitals., Conclusions: The presence at the Zaatari camp of a surgical facility, which is experienced and specialized in war surgery, is essential, as long as battles are ongoing. Many victims will later require long-term surgical care for the management of the sequelae associated with these traumas.

Multi-trauma patients need specific care provided by medical teams and hospitals with a technical platform that optimises emergency care.They also require a special 'shock management' unit with staff members available to welcome these patients and maintain their vital functions.

Background: Injury due to external causes is an important health problem in our society today. Emergency care systems based on the concept of "comprehensive care" can prevent deaths and disabilities as well as limit the severity and pain caused by trauma., Objective: To investigate the frequency and characteristics of different mechanisms of injury and to estimate mortality, comparing two comprehensive emergency systems: Atlantic Pyrenees (AP) in France and Navarra (NA) in Spain., Material and Methods: A prospective cohort study of severe multiple-injury patients attended to by the comprehensive emergency care systems of AP and NA from April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002. Data were collected from personal patient data, the emergency coordination center "112," pre-hospital and hospital health care levels, and discharge data. Bivariate statistical analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were employed for statistical management., Results: There were 614 severe multiple trauma patients recorded, 278 in AP and 336 in NA. Significant differences were observed in arrival time, pre-hospitalization care, pre-hospital Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) at the intensive care unit, and procedures used (intubation, administration of fluids, immobilization, and diagnostic methods). Logistic regression showed significant differences in patient death, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.03), penetrating or accidental injuries, (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.1-13.1), RTS (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.5-0.7), and ISS score (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.0-1.1)., Conclusion: Despite a more aggressive approach and employment of greater resources, the French comprehensive trauma system does not show greater survival rates among injured patients compared to Navarra, even when controlling for confounding factors like age, injury mechanism, RTS, ISS, and others.

The law number 2005-370 of April 22, 2005 concerning the patients' rights at the end of life imposes from now the refusal of futility of care, a shared decision-making in unconscious patients and the duty of a palliative strategy. We describe a case of polytrauma, for which the shared decision-making process led to a palliative strategy after initial aggressive life-support treatments. This case underlines the need for a two-step model of decision-making process, which distinguishes between goals of care and withdrawal or withholding of life support. It suggests that implementation of written procedures could improve the quality of management at the end of life and traceability of decisions.

Whether you are an aficionado or completely uninitiated, everyone has an opinion on bull-fighting. The bull-fighter is in constant risk of injury. A medical team made up of surgeons, anesthetists, emergency physicians and nurses remains present throughout the show. For the anaesthetist and surgeon, a wounded bullfighter is an emergency because the vital and functional prognosis are engaged. The team must act in conformity with normal practice and the Code of Medical Ethics because any lack of coordination between the practitioners is punishable by law in the same way as technical fault. Several specific aspects of this type of medical procedure should be highlighted: firstly, the legal restrictions within the corrida, and secondly, the nature of the medical team, which may be comprised of doctors normally based within a public health institution and others who practice in a private health establishment. The particularity of the situation reveals differences in the system of liability, and civil liability must be distinguished from administrative liability: both of these allow the victim to obtain compensation for harm caused, but the consequences of each are different according to doctor status. The fact that the anaesthetists frequently work on a voluntary and benevolent basis does not exonerate them from liability. Lastly, a question frequently addressed is whether or not the doctor is covered by his professional insurance when he is on ringside duty.

Objective: Ventilator-associated pneumonia is said to be associated with an increased mortality or a prolonged intensive care unit stay. In multiple trauma, the use of selective digestive decontamination has been reported to decrease morbidity and mortality associated with pneumonia. We performed a study to evaluate the attributable morbidity and mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia in multiple trauma patients with head trauma treated with selective digestive decontamination., Design: Prospective, matched-paired, case-control study., Setting: Intensive care unit at a tertiary university hospital., Patients: During a 6-yr period, 324 consecutive multiple trauma patients with head trauma requiring mechanical ventilation for >48 hrs were prospectively followed for the development of VAP. Case-control matching criteria were as follows: 1) age difference within 5 yrs, 2) Glasgow coma scale within five categories, 3) injury severity score within 5 points, 4) APACHE II score within 5 points, 5) ventilation of control patients for at least as long as the cases. The selective digestive decontamination regimen was used in all patients (cases and controls): polymixin E, gentamicin, and amphotericin B. Systemic cefazolin (1 g three times a day) was given for the first 3 days of intensive care unit stay., Measurements and Main Results: Analysis was performed on 58 pairs that were matched with 100% of success The most common isolates recovered were Staphylococcus aureus (39%) and Haemophilus influenzae (22%). High-risk pathogens were rarely isolated: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.1%), Acinetobacter species (8.6%), and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (6.7%). The duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay were increased in case patients (11.6 +/- 1.7 and 22.7 +/- 2.9 days, respectively) compared with control patients (9.4 +/- 1.3 and 16.8 +/- 2.9 days, respectively; p <.0006). Mortality was similar in both case (17%) and control (24%) patients., Conclusion: Ventilator-associated pneumonia did not seem to increase mortality of multiple trauma patients with head trauma who received selective digestive decontamination. Whether or not this conclusion applied to trauma patients not receiving selective digestive decontamination should be evaluated in further studies.

The admission of patients with severe multiple trauma and the organization of treatment must follow a few basic principles: 1) continuous, uninterrupted management by the various links of the medical chain, 2) single location: the various persons ensuring the treatment must go to the patient's side, and not the opposite, 3) pluridisciplinary, polyvalent care, and lastly, 4) single command: for us, the orthopedist-traumatologist must direct and coordinate care to the severely injured persons, and the so-called general surgeons is in charge of the others. Three structures of admission currently coexist in France: the department of admission, the emergency department and, rarely, the center of traumatology. Carefully planned routes, adapted facilities, plenty of material and staff are essential. The initial management of patients with multiple trauma in both diagnostic and therapeutic at the same time: first aid in case of vital emergency, resuscitation, clinical, radiological and biological assessment, aimed at drawing a complete census of the lesions and establishing their hierarchy. Considering this hierarchy, the treatment must urgently, completely and definitively deal with: In the first place, and in extreme emergency, vital lesions: visceral rupture, internal and external hemorrhages as well as orthopedic priorities: neuromedullary compression, fracture with vascular lesion, open fracture. All the lesions must be treated definitively if this is possible. However, not all fractures must be operated immediately. Only the severe lesions that are a factor of shock (eg. fracture of both femurs) must be reduced and fixed in emergency. The temporary treatment of the other lesions with plaster casts or continuous extension must not be neglected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This study attempts to objectively estimate the efficiency of early medical care. It is based on the comparison of two series of multiple injured patients. Ten years separated the two groups and during this period, an Emergency Medical Aid Service (SAMU 94) was created. The positive effect of early medical care was established through the variations of injury severity indices currently used in polytrauma: after the institution of Mobile Intensive Care Medical Units on the site of accidents cardiac arrests were ten times less numerous although lesions were more serious in the second series. Without taking into account the mortality rate of lower-limb trauma, where crush syndromes were very numerous, mortality rate decreased as far as spinal, chest, abdominal, and pelvic traumas were concerned. An estimation of the cost of such a system raised the problem of maximizing the efficiency of improved early medical care.