Search

Based on the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) methodology, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the eating quality of grass-fed Angus x Salers beef by French consumers, across different muscle cuts (m. triceps brachii caput longum, m. longissimus dorsi et thoracis and m. rectus abdominis), ageing times (5 and 14 days) and muscle slicing and grilling methods (being distinguished by 2 different sides on the grill), and to further quantify whether the MSA model could predict the eating quality of the meat produced by these lean crossbred animals. The results showed that French consumers can discern significant differences in eating quality traits across muscle cuts but not between ageing times and muscle slicing methods. In this study, the accuracy of eating quality score (MQ4)-assigned MSA grade was 64.5%. Due to the lack of MSA data on these lean crossbred animals, the prediction of eating quality from carcass characteristics was less accurate than usual. However, these results do indicate that the MSA sensory testing protocol, the MQ4 calculation and the MSA quality grades could be used to support a consumer-based quality grading system in France., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: We postulate that the absence of a CPT code for DIEP (deep inferior epigastric perforator) free flap in breast reconstruction is in part responsible for the delayed adoption of this modern technique in France. In order to provide data to our regulating health agency, we determined the cost of this technique compared to a gold standard. We performed a cost-identification study, comparing costs of DIEP free flap versus latissimus dorsi pedicled flap with implant (LD+I) in secondary breast reconstruction following irradiation., Methods: Over a 12-month period, direct medical and non-medical costs as well as indirect costs were recorded in both groups (DIEP and LD+I)., Results: In an academic department funded by the national health system, total cost of a secondary breast reconstruction by DIEP free flap was 10,671 ± 3005€ (n=57) versus 8218 ± 2049€ (n=18) for the LD+I group (P<0.05). Mean OR occupation time was 390 ± 64minutes for DIEP versus 283 ± 44minutes for LD+I (P<0.05). Mean hospital stay was 6 ± 2 days for DIEP versus 5 ± 2 days for LD+I (P>0.05)., Conclusion: DIEP free flap technique offers a long lasting breast reconstruction at an reasonable expense compared to the LD+I (+22%). Furthermore, in an academic department, collaboration of two microsurgeons during DIEP flaps allows OR times to drop significantly and become competitive with LD+I., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)