Search

Anti-Interleukin-1 (Anti-IL-1) drugs are used to treat some chronic rheumatic diseases that can affect young people, including women of childbearing age. Two anti-IL-1 drugs are available in France: anakinra and canakinumab. Data on their use during pregnancy are still limited. Based on the published literature, we carried out a review of the use of these anti-IL-1 therapies during pregnancy: therapeutic indications, pharmacological profiles and assessment of embryonic, fetal and neonatal risks. Based on this analysis, and given the absence of any reported concern, it is possible to consider the use of these two treatments during pregnancy if the clinical situation so requires and under certain conditions. Based on the data available to date, anakinra should be preferred to canakinumab whenever possible., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Rational: Studies are needed to determine if multimorbidity screening and management reduce the rate of multimorbidity accumulation in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD)., Objectives: This study evaluates the impact of systematic screening programme on patient care and hospitalisation rates., Methods: Patients with IRD who participated in the screening programme (exposed patients) were identified within the French national health database and matched with controls. Two sets of analysis were performed: one with multivariate analysis and a second using a propensity score matching to ensure comparability between exposed patients and controls. The primary endpoint (PE) was a composite score assessing the dispensation of multimorbidity-preventing drugs, including vaccines, lipid-lowering agents, antiosteoporotic medications and antiplatelet drugs, during the year following the index date., Results: The first analysis included 286 exposed patients and 858 controls, demonstrating a higher rate of meeting the PE in exposed patients (adjusted OR=1.6 (1.2-2.2), p<0.01). Propensity score matching resulted in 281 exposed patients and 281 controls. Exposed patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of meeting the PE compared with controls (54.8% vs 44.5%; OR=1.5; p=0.015), with increased utilisation of vaccines, cholesterol-lowering drugs and antiosteoporotic medications. Furthermore, emergency admission and hospitalisations for fracture, cardiovascular events or infection were significantly less frequent in the exposed group (7.1% vs 15.3%; OR=0.42, p<0.01), with a reduction in severe infections (0.7% vs 3.9%; p=0.03)., Conclusion: Systematic multimorbidity screening in patients with IRD boosted preventive medication use and reduced hospital admissions, justifying time and resource allocation for screening., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To compare the risk of gastrointestinal perforation (GIP), a rare but serious adverse event, in patients who a JAK inhibitor (JAKi; tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib) versus adalimumab (tumor necrosis factor inhibitor) among a comprehensive real-world population of patients with rheumatic diseases., Methods: We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of the French national health data system, the exposed group that received a JAKi and the comparison group adalimumab. We included all individuals with a rheumatic disease who had their first dispensation of these treatments from July 2017 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of GIP (end of follow-up May 2022). Weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) were estimated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method to account for confounding factors. Concomitant administration of systemic glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and proton-pump inhibitors were time-varying variables., Results: The cohort included 39,758 patients: 12,335 and 27,423 in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab (mean age 58.2 and 47.3 years; female 76% and 58%; rheumatoid arthritis 85.3% and 27.3%, and psoriatic arthritis/axial spondyloarthritis 14.7% and 72.7%), respectively. During follow-up, 38 and 42 GIPs occurred in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab groups; incidence rates were 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.8) and 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.5) per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Rates of GIP did not differ between the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab: wHR 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.9; P = 0.65). Despite the lack of power in some subgroup analyses, results were consistent whatever the subgroup of a type of JAKi received or subgroup with a type of rheumatic disease., Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort study, the rates of GIPs did not differ between groups of patients who received JAKi and adalimumab treatment. These results need to be confirmed in other observational studies., (© 2024 American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: To explore how patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRDs) coped with their disease during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify possible predictive factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection in this population., Methods: Patients followed in a single rheumatology department in France or registered on the Spondy+ platform, a secure e-health platform for spondyloarthritis patients, were invited to complete a questionnaire focused on their experiences around COVID19 symptoms, testing and medications access during the lockdown period. Descriptive statistics were used to report questionnaire's results. Factors associated with COVID-19 or with treatment discontinuation were assessed by logistic regression., Results: We obtained 655 answers from the 2,081 contacted patients: 474 with spondyloarthritis, 129 with rheumatoid arthritis and 52 with psoriatic arthritis. The population was predominantly female (61.8%) with a mean age of 51.0±13.4 years. Incidence of COVID-19 was 6.9% (95%CI: 5.1-9.2%), including 12 confirmed and 33 highly suspicious cases. No death was observed and five patients needed to be hospitalized. Factors independently associated with an increased risk of infection were SARS-CoV-2 exposure, younger age and non-smoking. More than 30% of the patients suspended or decreased the dosage of one of their drugs during the lockdown period. This was followed in 63.4% of them by increased disease activity. Modifications were mostly motivated by fear of contagion (79.3%)., Conclusion: We did not observe any increase of incidence or severity of COVID-19 in patients suffering of the 3 most common CIRDs. This survey also adds evidence of the safety of anti-rheumatic drugs use regarding COVID-19., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rheumatologists must contend with COVID-19 pandemic in the management of their patients and many questions have been raised on the use of both anti-inflammatory drugs and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). The French Society of Rheumatology (SFR) selected the most critical ones to the daily practice of a rheumatologist and a group of 10 experts from SFR and Club Rheumatism and Inflammation (CRI) boards proposed responses based on the current knowledge of May 2020., Methods: Following the availability of the first 18 questions and statements, 1400 individuals consulted the frequently asked questions between the March 31, 2020 and April 12, 2020. As a result, 16 additional questions were forwarded to the SFR, and answered by the board. An additional round of review by email and video conference was organized, which included updates of the previous statements. The scientific relevance of 5 of the questions led to their inclusion in this document. Each response received a final assessment on a scale of 0-10 with 0 meaning no agreement whatsoever and 10 being in complete agreement. The mean values of these votes for each question are presented as the levels of agreement (LoA) at the end of each response. This document was last updated on April 17, 2020., Results: Based on current scientific literature already published, in most circumstances, there is no contraindication to the initiation or continuation of anti-inflammatory drugs as well as DMARDs. If signs suggestive of infection (coronavirus or other) occur, treatments should be discontinued and resumed, if necessary, after 2 weeks without any symptoms. Only, some signals suggest that people taking an immunosuppressive dose of corticosteroid therapy are at greater risk of developing severe COVID-19. Intra-articular injections of glucocorticoids are allowed when there is no reasonable therapeutic alternative, and providing that precautions to protect the patient and the practitioner from viral contamination are adopted, included appropriate information to the patient., Conclusions: Currently available data on managing patients with rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic are reassuring and support continuing or initiating symptomatic as well as specific treatments of these diseases, the main target of their management remaining their appropriate control, even during this pandemic., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The collaborative initiative of the European Network of Pregnancy Registers in Rheumatology (EuNeP) aims to combine data available in nationwide pregnancy registers to increase knowledge on pregnancy outcomes in women with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) and on drug safety during pregnancy and lactation. The objective of this study was to describe the similarities and differences of the member registers., Methods: From all registers, information about their structure and design was collected, as well as which parameters regarding demographics, maternal outcomes, treatment, course and outcome of pregnancy, and development of the child were available in the respective datasets. Furthermore, the current recruitment status was reported., Results: The four registers (EGR2 (France), RePreg (Switzerland), RevNatus (Norway), and Rhekiss (Germany)) collect information prospectively and nationwide. Patients can be enrolled before conception or during pregnancy. To date, more than 3500 patients in total have been included, and data on 2200 pregnancies with an outcome are available. The distribution of diagnoses in the respective registers varies considerably, and only three entities (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and spondyloarthritis) are captured by all the registers. Broad consistency was found in non-disease-specific data items, but differences regarding instruments and categories as well as frequency of data collection were revealed. Disease-specific data items are less homogeneously collected., Conclusion: Although the registers in this collaboration have similar designs, we found numerous differences in the variables collected. This survey of the status quo of current pregnancy registers is the first step towards identifying data collected uniformly across registers in order to facilitate joint analyses., Trial Registration: Not applicable.

Background: Adherence to treatment is a key issue in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRDs)., Objective: To develop recommendations to facilitate in daily practice, the management of non-adherence to disease-modifying drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, connective tissue diseases or other CIRDs., Methods: The process comprised (a) systematic literature reviews of methods (including questionnaires) to measure non-adherence, risk factors for non-adherence and efficacy of targeted interventions; (b) development of recommendations through consensus of 104 rheumatologist and nurse experts; (c) assessment of agreement and ease of applicability (1-5 where 5 is highest) by the 104 experts., Results: (a) Overall, 274 publications were analysed. (b) The consensus process led to 5 overarching principles and 10 recommendations regarding adherence. Key points include that adherence should be assessed at each outpatient visit, at least using an open question; questionnaires and hydroxychloroquine blood level assessments may also be useful. Risk factors associated to non-adherence were listed. Patient information and education, and patient/physician shared decision, are key to optimize adherence. Other techniques such as formalized education sessions, motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy may be useful. All health professionals can get involved and e-health may be a support. (c) The agreement with the recommendations was high (range of means, 3.9-4.5) but ease of applicability was lower (2.7-4.4)., Conclusions: Using an evidence-based approach followed by expert consensus, this initiative should improve the assessment and optimization of adherence in chronic inflammatory rheumatic disorders., (Copyright © 2018 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We studied the clinical phenotypes and tolerance to treatments in a series of patients affected by both inflammatory joint diseases and mastocytosis., Methods: This retrospective multicenter study was conducted on behalf of 3 networks focused on mastocytosis, pediatric, and adults' inflammatory joint diseases. Patients who displayed both mastocytosis and inflammatory joint diseases were included., Results: A total of 31 patients were included. They had spondyloarthritis (SpA) (16 patients), rheumatoid arthritis (6 patients), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (2 patients), and undifferentiated arthritis (7 patients). The median ages at diagnosis of arthritis and mastocytosis were 44 and 40.5 years, respectively. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were required in 22 patients, comprising mostly methotrexate (13 patients), salazopyrin (8 patients), anti-tumor-necrosis-factor agents (7 patients), and corticosteroids (9 patients). They were well tolerated. Adverse events occurred in 2/24 patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The prevalence of SpA among the 600 patients included in the mastocytosis cohort was 2.33%, which is significantly higher than the prevalence of SpA in the French population (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: This study suggests that mastocytosis is associated with a higher prevalence of SpA than expected, and that DMARDs, notably anti-TNFα agents, are well tolerated in patients with mastocytosis. Mast cells might be involved in the development of SpA., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Several case reports suggested that tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF) inhibitors might increase the incidence and/or alter the natural course of melanoma towards a more aggressive behaviour., Objective: Our objective was to point if history of melanoma in patients exposed to TNF inhibitors could present with a particular pattern at diagnosis or during follow-up., Methods: We performed a retrospective multicentre study settled in the West part of France to collect and analyse all cases of patients with melanoma who received anti-TNF therapy., Results: Fifteen cases were included. First, 10 patients (mean age: 55.6 years; sex ratio: 1) had a melanoma diagnosed after TNF inhibitors initiation. The mean duration between initiation of treatment and melanoma was 48.7 months. Two patients died of metastatic disease. Second, four patients had a past history of melanoma before anti-TNF therapy (mean duration of treatment: 10.8 months). None experienced a progression of melanoma disease. Last, one woman had a past history of melanoma before and then developed a second melanoma when exposed to biotherapy., Conclusion: Our case series does not reveal a distinct profile of melanoma in the patients exposed to TNF inhibitors. Additional prospective trials including larger number of patient are needed to demonstrate the possible link between biological therapy with TNF inhibitors and development of melanoma., (© 2013 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Objectives: To describe cases of new onset of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) receiving anti-TNF-α therapy., Methods: A call for observations of such cases was sent to members of the French "Club rhumatismes et inflammation". Only patients without intestinal symptoms before introduction of anti TNF-α agents were included., Results: During a 2-year period, 16 patients were declared: nine men and seven women, mean age 41.5 ± 17.4 years, 12 patients with ankylosing spondylitis, one with rheumatoid arthritis, one with psoriatic arthritis and two juvenile idiopathic arthritis with enthesitis related arthritis. Overall, 14 patients received etanercept and two had infliximab. The meantime frame between onsets of anti-TNF--α drugs and development of IBD was 29.3 ± 20.1 months. According to endoscopic and histological findings, IBD was classified as typical Crohn's disease in eight cases, Crohn's-like disease in six cases, indeterminate in one case and definite ulcerative colitis in one case. For all cases, each TNF-α blocking agent was discontinued and replaced by another monoclonal anti TNF-α antibody. After a mean follow up period of 23.4 ± 19.5 months, outcome was favorable without recurrent or flaring IBD., Conclusions: Paradoxical IBD may occur during anti TNF-α therapy for inflammatory rheumatic disease, mostly in patients with spondylarthropathies while receiving etanercept, at a frequency estimated to 0.15% in the French patients with spondylarthropathies exposed to TNF-α antagonists. The IBD mainly corresponded to Crohn's or Crohn's-like disease. On the contrary, new onset IBD is less frequently observed in other cases of IRD and with other TNF--α blockers., (Copyright © 2011 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess natural microbial agents, history and risk factors for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) infections in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α-blockers, through the French RATIO registry and a case-control study., Methods: Cases were TJA infections during TNFα-blocker treatments. Each case was compared to two controls (with TJA and TNFα-blocker therapy, but without TJA infection) matched on age (±15 years), TJA localization, type of rheumatic disorder and disease duration (±15 years). Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate analyses with conditional logistic regression., Results: In the 20 cases (18 rheumatoid arthritis), TJA infection concerned principally the knee (n = 12, 60%) and the hip (n = 5, 25%). Staphylococcus was the more frequent microorganism involved (n = 15, 75%). Four patients (20%) were hospitalized in an intensive care unit and two died from infection. Eight cases (40%) versus 5 controls (13%) had undergone primary TJA or TJA revision for the joint subsequently infected during the last year (P = 0.03). Of these procedures, 5 cases versus 1 control were performed without withdrawing TNFα-blockers (P = 0.08). In multivariate analysis, predictors of infection were primary TJA or TJA revision for the joint subsequently infected within the last year (odds ratio, OR = 88.3; 95%CI 1.1-7,071.6; P = 0.04) and increased daily steroid intake (OR = 5.0 per 5 mg/d increase; 1.1-21.6; P = 0.03). Case-control comparisons showed similar distribution between TNFα-blockers (P = 0.70)., Conclusions: In patients receiving TNFα-blockers, TJA infection is rare but potentially severe. Important risk factors are primary TJA or TJA revision within the last year, particularly when TNFα-blockers are not interrupted before surgery, and the daily steroid intake.

The incidence of tuberculosis among patients with systemic rheumatic diseases is much higher than in the general population (the risk is multiplied by 5 to 15 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus). Reactivation of a latent tuberculosis is frequent, as assessed by the short delay of occurrence after a systemic rheumatic disease has been diagnosed. Besides immunosuppression induced by the underlying disease, the role of glucocorticoids and of immunosuppressive therapy including biotherapies using TNF antagonists must be underlined. Tuberculosis in such patients frequently presents as extrapulmonary or disseminated disease. A screening of tuberculosis is recommended before anti-TNF therapy, and includes previous history questioning, chest X ray, tuberculin skin test with 5 international units of tuberculin. Immunological methods of tuberculosis detection are under evaluation in these patients. If a latent tuberculosis infection is diagnosed, a specific tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis, started at least 3 weeks before initiation of TNF antagonists, has allowed to reduce the occurrence of anti-TNF-associated tuberculosis in patients living in Europe and North America. The screening strategies for tuberculosis should probably be extended in all patients with systemic rheumatic diseases receiving glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressive therapy.

Analysis of national data from the health ministry programme of reduction of the cardiovascular risks (2002-2005) shows a high frequency of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors in the general population. It is of interest to analyse these data in relation to the practice of rheumatology. In addition, the frequency of cardiovascular pathologies is higher in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthropathy. These notions are also very important since these two populations are often treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for a long duration. General knowledge shown in this article concerning the cardiovascular risk factors and co-morbidities in the patients with rheumatic pathologies allows, within the context of a therapeutic decisional strategy in rheumatology, a better estimation of the individual benefit/risk ratio of each prescription and more particularly that of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

The cardiovascular impact of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the higher cardiovascular mortality during treatment of inflammatory rheumatism impose a rigorous evaluation of the cardiovascular risk of rheumatic patients. Large epidemiological studies have identified risk factors for cardiovascular diseases such as the age, male gender, family history (infarct, stroke), tobacco consumption, systolic arterial pressure, renal insufficiency, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitis, sedentariness, obesity and "electric" ventricular hypertrophy. Some equations make it possible to evaluate the absolute cardiovascular risk at the individual level, which corresponds to the onset risk of a stroke in the 10 years to come in a subject according to the number and importance of each of his risk factors. It has been demonstrated that the correction of one or more risk factors reduce the overall cardiovascular risk justifying the strategies for evaluating this risk to define therapeutic intervention thresholds. The impact of a long-term anti-inflammatory treatment or an inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis has not been the subject of specific epidemiological study allowing these elements to be included in an equation of the estimation of the cardiovascular risk. However, the introduction of on anti-inflammatory treatment, likely to increase the cardiovascular risk of a patient, certainly justifies an evaluation of the absolute cardiovascular risk.

Objectives: To assess the frequency, features, and outcome of excruciating lumbar, dorsal, and/or thoracic pain following injections of local corticosteroids in rare instances., Methods: A questionnaire mailed to 500 French rheumatologists., Results: Three hundred and eighteen cases were reported by 92 rheumatologists (one event per 8000 injections or 6.5 years of practice), following injections into lumbar epidural space (39%), an upper limb (30%), a lower limb (mostly the heel) (24%), or other locations (7%), of cortivazol (67%), hydrocortisone (25%), betamethasone (7%), or paramethasone (1%). Symptoms occurred 1-5 min (78%) or less than 1 min (22%) after injection, and highly acute axial pain usually lasted for less than 5 min (34%) or 5-15 min (51%). In addition to pain in lumbar (84%) and/or dorsal regions (25%) [often preceded or associated with thoracic pain (36%)], other signs were: anxiety (87%), shortness of breath (64%), facial flushing (64%), diffuse sweating (41%), agitation (29%), transient cough (23%), abdominal pain (20%), transient hypertension (15%), paleness (10%), hypotension (8%), diarrhoea (3%) and headache (3%). None of these patients was known to be allergic, and urticaria developed in only 2%. Outcome was favourable in all cases (even though 4/318 patients were transiently hospitalised) with an overall duration of 25 +/- 71 min. Another injection was performed later in 146/318 cases (46%), but Tachon's syndrome recurred in only 20 of these 146 patients (14%)., Conclusion: The outcome of this impressive syndrome seems excellent. Tachon's syndrome might be the venous counterpart of Nicolau's syndrome (injection of corticosteroids in an artery).

Because extrapolation of adverse event rates from clinical trials to the general population relies on the assumption of similar drug-usage patterns, we have studied usage patterns for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) from the National Health Insurance claims database. Reimbursement patterns of NSAIDs and analgesics were studied in a cohort of 232 users, half selected from authorisations of reimbursed spa cures, and the other half - strictly matched according to age and gender - who had redeemed at study onset at least one prescription for NSAIDs, analgesics or other antirheumatic drugs. Drug utilisation was measured as the total number of defined daily doses (DDD) bought over the 9-month study period. Over this time, the patients bought a median 45 DDD of NSAIDs out of the 270 needed to cover the whole period. Only two patients bought 270 DDD or more. Median paracetamol use (alone or combined) was 26 days. This study shows that patients use NSAIDs either intermittently or at lower than recommended doses, which is consistent with a primarily symptomatic use. Intermittent or on-demand use of NSAIDs, or at doses lower than full, could partly explain the lower rates of gastrointestinal bleeding and other ulcer complications in postmarketing epidemiological studies than could be expected from the findings of clinical trials.

The secondary gastrointestinal effects associated with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are well documented in the medical literature. The "iatrogenic" cost arising from the treatment of these secondary effects, however, is less well known. Existing epidemiologic and clinical studies report that the cost of NSAIDs is multiplied by a coefficient that ranges from 1.36 to 3 when the cost of treating the induced gastroduodenal damage is taken into account. A simple methodology has been developed to calculate the "shadow price" of an NSAID by incorporating the costs of treating the gastroduodenal damage, thus yielding a figure that reflects the real economic burden of NSAID therapy. Using study data from seven countries, the cost effectiveness of prophylactic treatment with misoprostol--a prostaglandin analogue whose efficacy has been proven in the prevention of gastroduodenal ulcers in arthritic patients treated with NSAIDs--is reviewed. In the majority of cases, the financial benefits of preventing the ulcers equal or surpass the cost of prevention.

The costs of treating gastroduodenal ulcers caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are shown to increase the total cost of NSAID treatment to the Assurance-Maladie, the French national health insurance system. This increased cost is termed the iatrogenic cost factor, and is defined as the ratio of the shadow price of an NSAID to its reimbursed cost. The shadow price is calculated from estimates of the incidence of NSAID-induced gastropathies, the cost of the drug, and the hospital and ambulatory costs of treating the gastropathies. The resulting iatrogenic cost factors are estimated as 1.36 for naproxen, 1.48 for sulindac, 1.65 for diclofenac, 1.67 for piroxicam, 2.00 for ketoprofen, and 2.12 for etodolac.

A study was undertaken to evaluate the use of self-administered medication in 895 patients with rheumatologic disorders by all of the 18 rheumatologists practicing in one region (the southern portion of the Loire Department and all of the Haute-Loire Department) over a six-day period. It was noted that 445 out of 895 patients (49.72 percent) reported taking one or several medications other than those prescribed during the previous 3 month period before their office visit. Self-administered medications were taken at least weekly in 53.5 percent of cases and at least monthly in 83,7 percent. Most often one or two medications were involved (60.9 and 25.6 percent respectively). Age, profession, the presence or absence of psychiatric disturbances, the duration of the doctor-patient relationship, as well as the patient's specific rheumatologic problem seemed to be influencing factors. Aspirin or other analgesics comprised 53.1 percent of the medication taken, whereas other non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents comprised only 2.3 percent. No steroids were self-administered. There are multiple potential side effects with self-administered drugs: therapy can be poorly suited for the illness in question, it may delay diagnosis and the beginning of effective therapy, there can be increased iatrogenic risk due to inadequate therapy, and unnecessary expense. Drugs used as self-administered medications originate most often from previous medical prescriptions which may or may not have been prescribed for the patient's same medical problem (34.4 percent), and most medication used was bought without needing a prescription (52.4 percent). Prevention, therefore, requires that potential consumers of self-administered drugs be educated concerning these problems, as well as health professionals, the pharmaceutical industry, and concerned government agencies.