Search

Spiders are often wrongly designated as responsible for cutaneous eruptions. We aim to describe spider bites and the spider species implicated in metropolitan France. A retrospective observational study was conducted for all reported cases of spider bites from 2007 to 2018 extracted from the French Poison Control Centers (PCCs) information system, after exclusion of non‐native spiders. We described identification of the spider, level of certainty of the bite, symptoms and severity of cases. 1194 cases of spider bites met the inclusion criteria. The average age of the patients was 36.9 ± 19.8 years. Identification of the species or at least that a spider was implicated was only possible in 346 cases (29.0%). Loxosceles were involved in 53 cases (4.4%), Latrodectus in 46 cases (3.9%) and Cheiracanthium in 35 cases (2.9%). In one third of cases, the involved spider was not known to be present where the bite occurred. Where most of the patients (n = 1111, 93%) reported at least one cutaneous symptom, most of the symptoms were neurological. The bite was considered proven in only 242 cases (20%). Despite the efforts of arachnologists to educate the public, the fear of spiders is still alive in France, where spider bite is rare with low severity and often unproven. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Loxoscelism is an envenomation due to a bite by spiders of the genus Loxosceles, very well known on the American continent but unrecognized in Europe. Case report: We report the case of a 36-year-old woman, without any medical history or treatment, who went to a University Hospital in the South of France, for a painful skin lesion on the internal part of her left thigh, which appeared in the morning and developed rapidly during the day. She was directed to the infectious disease department with a diagnosis of skin infection. In spite of the antibiotics, the lesion increased, with a hemorrhagic central blister, an irregular ecchymotic center, a pale perimeter, and an extensive inflammatory and indurate oedema affecting the whole thigh. There was also a low-grade fever, chills, intense pain and a generalized scarlatiniform exanthema. The lesion was finally diagnosed as cutaneous loxoscelism, then confirmed by collection and identification of a Loxosceles rufescens spider killed by the patient the morning of the occurrence of the lesion. Following an initial symptomatic treatment, the development of a necrotic ulcer justified a delayed surgical reconstruction, after stabilization of the lesion. Conclusions: Loxosceles bites are usually painless and rarely noticed by patients, often leading to a presumptive diagnosis. Therefore, in the case of a dermonecrotic lesion developing unfavourably with antibiotics, cutaneous loxoscelism should be one of the diagnoses to be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]