Search

Aim: To describe the clinical features and etiologies of upper limb venous thrombosis (ULVT)., Methods: All patients with a clinically suspected ULVT, were included retrospectively from January to December 2016. Diagnosis of ULVT was based on doppler-ultrasonography. Clinical features, topography and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) were analyzed. The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative value (NPV) of clinical symptoms leading to ULVT suspicion were estimated by comparing patients with and without ULVT., Results: Among 488 patients with a suspected ULVT, 160 were diagnosed with ULVT, including, 80 with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and 80 with superficial venous thrombosis (SVT). Symptomatic PE was found in 2.5 % of cases (n=4). None of the clinical symptoms of ULVT had a sensitivity greater than 40 %. For DVT, presence of superior vena cava syndrome had a 100 % PPV, 71.6 % NPV and 100 % Sp. For SVT, the presence of an cord-like induration had a 85.7 % PPV, 75.3 % NPV and 98.4 % Sp. An endovenous device was present in 87.5 % of DVT and 97.5 % of SVT cases. Malignant hemopathy was found in 43.8 % and 31.3 % of cases of DVT and SVT, respectively. Sepsis and solid neoplasia were present in 25 % and 15 % of cases of ULVT, respectively. Peripherally inserted central catheter or implantable sites were present in 40 % and 17.5 % of DVT patients. No solid neoplasia, hematological malignancy or thrombophilia were diagnosed in patients with ULVT., Conclusion: An endovenous device was involved in 92.5 % of cases of ULVT. The prevalence of symptomatic PE was low. Hematological malignancies, sepsis and neoplasia were the most common conditions present in patients with ULVT., (Copyright © 2018 Société Nationale Française de Médecine Interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) is estimated at 10 to 20% in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) and often requires renal replacement therapy (RRT). ICU mortality in AKI patients can exceed 50%. Venous catheters are the preferred vascular access method for AKI patients requiring RRT, but carry a risk of catheter thrombosis or infection. Catheter lock solutions are commonly used to prevent such complications. Heparin and citrate locks are both widely used for tunneled, long-term catheters, but few studies have compared citrate versus heparin for patients with short-term, non-tunneled catheters. We aim to compare citrate 4% catheter lock solution versus heparin in terms of event-free survival of the first non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter inserted in ICU patients with AKI requiring RRT. Secondary objectives are the rate of fibrinolysis, incidence of catheter thrombosis and catheter-related infection per 1,000 catheter days, length of stay in ICU and in-hospital and 28-day mortality., Methods/design: The VERROU-REA study is a randomized, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled superiority study carried out in the medical, surgical and nephrological ICUs of two large university hospitals in eastern France. A catheter lock solution composed of trisodium citrate at 4% will be compared to unfractionated heparin at a concentration of 5,000 IU/mL. All consecutive adult patients with AKI requiring extracorporeal RRT, and in whom a first non-tunneled catheter is to be inserted by the jugular or femoral approach, will be eligible. Catheters inserted by the subclavian approach, patients with acute liver failure, thrombopenia or contraindication to systemic anticoagulation will be excluded. Patients will be followed up daily in accordance with standard practices for RRT until death or discharge., Discussion: Data is scarce regarding the use of non-tunneled catheters in the ICU setting in patients with AKI. This study will provide an evidence base for recommendations regarding the use of anticoagulant catheter locks for the prevention of dysfunction in non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in patients with AKI in critical or intensive care., Trial Registration: Registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT01962116) on 27 August 2013.

Purpose: Whether an anticoagulant prophylaxis is needed for patients with cancer with a central venous catheter is a highly controversial subject. We designed a study to compare different prophylactic strategies over 3 months of treatment., Methods: We performed a phase III prospective, open-label randomized trial. After the insertion of a central venous access device, consecutive patients with planned chemotherapy for cancer were randomized to no anticoagulant prophylaxis, low molecular weight heparin [low molecular weight heparin (LMWH); with isocoagulation doses], or warfarin 1 mg/day. Treatments were given over the first 3 months. Doppler ultrasound and venographies were performed on days 1 and 90, respectively, or sooner in case of clinical presumption of thrombosis., Results: A total of 420 patients were randomized, and 407 were evaluable. Forty-two catheter-related deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurred (10.3 %), 20 in those with no anticoagulation, 8 in those receiving warfarin, and 14 in those receiving LMWH. Nine additional non-related catheter deep vein thrombosis (CDVT) occurred. Anticoagulation significantly reduced the incidence of catheter-related DVT (p = 0.035) and catheter non-related DVT (p = 0.007), with no difference between warfarin and LMWH. Safety was good (3.4 % of attributable events) but compliance with randomized prophylaxis was lower than expected., Conclusions: Prophylaxis showed a benefit regarding catheter-related and non-catheter-related DVT with no increase in serious side effects.