Search

The aim of this study was to report the 12-year longitudinal trends in regional disparity in terms of indications, techniques and waiting period for corneal transplantation in France from 2004 to 2015. The records of all corneal transplantations performed from 2004 to 2015 in France were retrospectively reviewed by analasing the registry and the territorial organization [divided France into 7 interregional areas of collection and distribution of grafts (IACD)] of the French Biomedicine Agency. A total of 46,658 corneal transplantations were performed between 2004 and 2015. In 2014, there was 65.8 keratoplasties per million inhabitants (10-6 per capita in France, but there were some regional disparities, from 44.9 × 10-6 per capita in IACD 2 to 87.2 × 10-6 per capita in IACD 5. In 2014, IACD 7 performed the highest number of transplantations for keratoconus with 15.7 × 10 - 6 per capita; IACD 5 ranked first for Fuchs endothelial disease and secondary endothelial failure with, respectively, 20.5 × 10-6 per capita and 21.2 × 10-6 per capita, and IACD 4 ranked first for graft failure with 17.4 × 10-6 per capita. All regions over the years began to perform more lamellar keratoplasties (4.3% in 2004 vs 45.2% in 2015) and fewer penetrating keratoplasties (85.8% in 2004 vs 48.2% in 2015). The mean waiting time was 3.4 ± 5.2 months in France over 12 years, with minimal disparities between regions: all of them under 4 months waiting time in 2015, from 1.4 months for IACD 1-3.8 months for IACD 5. Regional disparities have changed over the years, with a modification of indications, and upgrading surgical techniques for some indications. Some disparities remain, mainly because of the variability in the number and activity of transplantation centres and eye banks. Measures could be taken to minimize these disparities, such as increasing communication between eye banks. The waiting time for keratoplasty decreasing below the 4-month mark is a good indicator of the progress made. Regional disparities have decreased over the years, but some regions remain disadvantaged in terms of needs and access to transplants. Tomorrow's challenge is to identify solutions and adapt the offer to the needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To identify procedures to reduce maternal morbidity during cesarean., Material and Methods: The quality of evidence of the literature was assessed following the GRADE® method with questions formulated in the PICO format (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and outcomes defined a priori and classified according to their importance. An extensive bibliographic search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases. The quality of the evidence was assessed (high, moderate, low, very low) and a (i) strong or (ii) weak recommendations or (iii) no recommendation were formulated. The recommendations were reviewed in two rounds with external reviewers (Delphi survey) to select the consensus recommendations., Results: Of the 27 questions, there was agreement between the working group and the external reviewers on 26. The level of evidence of the literature was insufficient to provide a recommendation on 15 questions. Preventing hypothermia is recommended to increase maternal satisfaction and comfort (weak recommendation) and to reduce neonatal hypothermia (strong recommendation). The quality of the evidence of the literature did not allow to recommend the skin disinfectant to be used nor the relevance of a preoperative vaginal disinfection nor the choice between the use or nonuse of an indwelling bladder catheterization (if micturition takes place 1 hour before the cesarean section). The Misgav-Ladach technique or its analogues should be considered rather than the Pfannenstiel technique to reduce maternal morbidity (weak recommendation) bladder flap before uterine incision should not be performed routinely (weak recommendation), but a blunt (weak recommendation) and cephalad-caudad extension of uterine incision (weak recommendation) should be considered to reduce maternal morbidity. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended to reduce maternal infectious morbidity (strong recommendation) without recommendation on its type or the timing of administration (before incision or after cord clamping). The administration of carbetocin after cord clamping does not significantly decrease the incidence of blood loss>1000 ml, anemia, or blood transfusion compared with the administration of oxytocin. Thus, it is not recommended to use carbetocin rather than oxytocin in cesarean. It is recommended that systematic manual removal of the placenta not to be performed (weak recommendation). An antiemetic should be administered after cord clamping in women having a planned cesarean under locoregional anaesthesia to reduce intraoperative and postoperative nausea and vomiting (strong recommendation) with no recommendation regarding choice of use one or two antiemetics. The level of evidence of the literature was insufficient to provide any recommendation concerning single or double-layer closure of the uterine incision, or the uterine exteriorization. Closing the peritoneum (visceral or parietal) should not be considered (weak recommendation). The quality of the evidence of the literature was not sufficient to provide recommendation on systematic subcutaneous closure, including in obese or overweight patients, or the use of subcuticular suture in obese or overweight patients. The use of subcuticular suture in comparison with skin closure by staples was not considered as a recommendation due to the absence of a consensus in the external review rounds., Conclusion: In case of cesarean, preventing hypothermia, administering antiemetic and antibiotic prophylaxis after cord clamping are the only strong recommendations. The Misgav-Ladach technique, the way of performing uterine incision (no systematic bladder flap, blunt cephalad-caudad extension), not performing routine manual removal of the placenta nor closure of the peritoneum are weak recommendations and may reduce maternal morbidity., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)