Search

Objectives: Right posterior sectorectomy (RPS) preserves liver volume but typically requires a longer parenchymal transection distance than does right hepatectomy (RH). This study was conducted to define the advantages of one approach over the other., Methods: Databases at two institutions were retrospectively reviewed for all patients submitted to RPS or RH between January 2000 and August 2012. Primary outcomes were perioperative complications and 90-day mortality., Results: Patients undergoing RPS (n = 100) and RH (n = 480), respectively, were similar in demographics, comorbidities, operative indications and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) mean scores (7.8 in the RPS group and 7.7 in the RH group; P = 0.49). A comparison of the RPS group with the RH group showed no significant differences in mean estimated blood loss (697 ml versus 713 ml; P = 0.900), rate of transfusions (19.2% versus 17.1%; P = 0.720), margin-positive resection (9.2% versus 11.6%; P = 0.70), complications (41.8% versus 42.0%; P = 1.000), bile leak (3.0% versus 4.0%; P = 1.000), or length of stay (7.5 days versus 8.3 days; P = 0.360). Postoperative hepatic insufficiency (defined as a postoperative bilirubin level of >7 mg/dl or significant ascites), occurred less frequently after RPS (1.0% versus 8.5%; P = 0.005). Operation type remained an independent determinant of postoperative hepatic insufficiency after controlling for preoperative risk factors (RH: hazard ratio = 9.628, 95% confidence interval 1.295-71.573; P = 0.027). A total of 28 (4.8%) patients died within 90 days; these included 25 (5.2%) patients in the RH group and three (3.0%) in the RPS group (P = 0.449)., Conclusions: Despite similar blood loss and overall morbidity, RPS is associated with less hepatic insufficiency than RH. Right posterior sectorectomy is parenchyma-sparing and should be strongly considered when it is technically feasible and oncologically sound., (© 2013 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.)

Objective: Criteria for selecting patients to receive adjuvant chemotherapy in cases of resected intrahepatic or hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CC) are lacking. Some clinicians advocate the provision of adjuvant therapy in patients with lymph node (LN)-positive disease; however, nodal assessment is often inadequate. The aim of this study was to identify a surrogate criterion based on primary tumour characteristics., Methods: All patients who underwent resection for hilar or intrahepatic CC at a single institution between January 2000 and September 2009 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Pathological factors were recorded. The primary outcome assessed was overall survival (OS)., Results: In total, 69 patients underwent resection for hilar (n=34) or intrahepatic (n=35) CC. Their median age was 66 years and 27 patients (39%) were male. Median follow-up was 22 months and median OS was 17 months. Median tumour size was 5 cm. Overall, 23% of patients had a positive resection margin, 44% had perineural invasion, 32% had lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and 25% had positive LNs. The median number of LNs removed was two and the median number of positive LNs was zero. The presence of LVI was associated with reduced OS (11.9 months vs. 23.1 months; P=0.023). After accounting for all other adverse tumour factors, the presence of LVI persisted as the only negative prognostic factor for OS on multivariate Cox regression., Conclusions: In patients who had undergone resection of hilar or intrahepatic CC, the presence of LVI was strongly associated with reduced OS. Thus the finding of LVI may potentially be used as a criterion in the selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy., (© 2011 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association.)