1. [Passive euthanasia in clinical practice--the medical decision reflected in the legal position].
- Author
-
Möller T, Grabensee B, and Frister H
- Subjects
- Data Collection, Euthanasia, Passive statistics & numerical data, Female, Germany, Health Care Costs, Hospitals, University, Humans, Life Support Care economics, Life Support Care legislation & jurisprudence, Male, Quality of Life, Social Environment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Decision Making, Euthanasia, Passive legislation & jurisprudence, Practice Patterns, Physicians' statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background: Doctors are often confronted with end-of-life decisions. When deciding on the withdrawal of medical treatment physicians have to consider the legal position. This study was done to evaluated how far doctors at the university medical center in Düsseldorf had acted in conformity with the established case law in Germany., Methods: Between April and August 2006 doctors at the university medical center in Düsseldorf filled in a standardized questionnaire about the decisions they had taken to withdraw life-support treatment., Results: 128 of a total of 512 doctors questioned replied (25 %; 32,8 % females and 67,2 % males) . The survey showed that the judicial decision (that it is not necessary to provide treatment if life-support measures are not indicated) is largely determined by non-medical criteria. The clinical decision by doctors depended mainly on his personal opinion. Furthermore the survey showed that only a few doctors made use of the - lawful - option to withdraw medical treatment when this was not indicated. Finally the survey revealed that, in case of conflict between indication and perceived patients' wishes, the vast majority of doctors behaved in contravention of the decisions established by case law., Conclusion: There is the need to discuss what non-medical issues should be taken into account when determining the indication of withdrawal of life-support measures. The results also highlighted the uncertainties that exist regarding a doctor's decisions about it. Not only should legislation clarify whether "passive euthanasia" is allowed, but it would also be useful to delegate end-of-life decisions to a review board.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF