Search

Background: Most COVID‐19‐associated mucormycosis (CAM) cases are reported from India and neighbouring countries. Anecdotally cases from Europe have been presented. Objective: To estimate the disease burden and describe the clinical presentation of CAM in Germany. Methods: We identified cases through German mycology networks and scientific societies, and collected anonymised clinical information via FungiScope®. Results: We identified 13 CAM cases from six tertiary referral hospitals diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021. Twelve patients had severe or critical COVID‐19, eleven were mechanically ventilated for a median of 8 days (range 1‐27 days) before diagnosis of CAM. Eleven patients received systemic corticosteroids. Additional underlying medical conditions were reported for all but one patient, five were immunocompromised because of malignancy or organ transplantation, three were diabetic. Eleven patients developed pneumonia. Mortality was 53.8% with a median time from diagnosis of mucormycosis to death of 9 days (range 0–214 days) despite treatment with liposomal amphotericin B and/or isavuconazole in 10 of 13 cases. CAM prevalence amongst hospitalised COVID‐19 patients overall (0.67% and 0.58% in two centres) and those admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (1.47%, 1.78% and 0.15% in three centres) was significantly higher compared to non‐COVID‐19 patients (P <.001 for respective comparisons). Conclusion: COVID‐19‐associated mucormycosis is rare in Germany, mostly reported in patients with comorbidities and impaired immune system and severe COVID‐19 treated in the ICU with high mortality compared to mainly rhino‐orbito‐cerebral CAM in patients with mild COVID‐19 in India. Risk for CAM is higher in hospitalised COVID‐19 patients than in other patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In a recently reported randomized trial, low-dose intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) reduced the incidence of invasive fungal infections (20.2 vs. 4.6%, p < 0.001) in high-risk patients with hematological malignancies and prolonged neutropenia., Patients and Methods: In the present study, we performed a retrospective cost-benefit analysis of L-AmB prophylaxis from the hospital perspective., Results: Ninety-nine patients were eligible; baseline characteristics were balanced for age, sex, underlying disease, and duration of neutropenia. The mean duration of hospitalization was 42.9 days and 52.3 days in the prophylaxis arm and in patients without antifungal prophylaxis, respectively (p = 0.096). The L-AmB prophylaxis was associated with additional costs of approximately EUR 630 per patient. However, total medication costs (including L-AmB prophylaxis) were EUR 1,219 and EUR 2,815 in patients with L-AmB prophylaxis and in patients in the control arm, respectively (p < 0.001). When involving also costs for medical procedures, the L-AmB prophylaxis reaches a positive net benefit of EUR 1,094 per patient., Conclusions: Our data shows that antifungal prophylaxis, e.g. with L-AmB, can be a safe and effective strategy to reduce the frequency of invasive fungal infections in selected high-risk patients and to obtain significant cost savings for the hospital.