Search

Background: Approximately 15 000 people receive a diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Germany each year; in 20-30% of cases, metastatic RCC (mRCC) is already present at the time of diagnosis. This disease in the metastatic stage is still mainly treated palliatively, yet the multimodal therapeutic landscape has changed markedly over the past 15 years, with the approval of many new treatments for patients with mRCC., Methods: This review is based on prospective studies retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and the ASCO and ESMO databases and on the German and European oncological and urological guidelines for RCC., Results: Drugs are the mainstay of treatment. mRCC can be treated with a combination of two immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), a CPI and a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) (evidence level IA), or a TKI as monotherapy (evidence level IIC-IC). With prognosis-based sequential drug treatment, a mean progressionfree survival of 12 to 24 months and an overall survival of approximately 50 months can be achieved from the time of initiation of first-line therapy. Aside from pharmacotherapy, the multidisciplinary tumor board should evaluate the indications for local treatments such as cytoreductive nephrectomy, metastasectomy, and radiotherapy, depending on the individual prognostic constellation and the patient's present condition., Conclusion: Optimal individualized decisions require a high level of expertise and the collabo - ration of a multidisciplinary tumor board. Older prognostic parameters currently play a leading role in decision-making, while predictive parameters and molecular markers are not yet adequately validated.

Background: Renal cell carcinoma is the third most common tumor among urological tumors. In Germany more than 14,000 people are affected every year. The sex ratio is 2/3 men and 1/3 women., Objectives: The S3 guideline is intended to provide all disciplines dealing with renal cell carcinoma with the current status of diagnostics, therapy and follow-up care of the patients with this tumor., Materials and Methods: The first version of the German guideline on renal cell carcinoma was published in 2015. The development was carried out at S3 level, which means that a structured, evidence-based literature search was carried out, recommendations and statements were developed in topic-related working groups and were approved by an interdisciplinary group of officials elected by the different medical societies. The chapters were gradually revised in 2017, 2020 and 2021 to reflect new aspects. This article provides information about the most important innovations of the most recent update from 2023., Results: In the epidemiology subsection, the substance trichlorethene has been added as a risk factor for the development of renal cell carcinoma. While there were no new data on neoadjuvant therapy, the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab was the first substance to demonstrate improved disease-specific and overall survival in the adjuvant situation. The combination nivolumab plus cabozantinib and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab were included in the chapter on systemic therapy for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. New are the chapters on non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma and hereditary tumors., Conclusions: The S3 guideline provides a structured, evidence-based overview of all aspects of renal cell carcinoma., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma is a very rare malignancy that includes several histological subtypes. Each subtype may need to be addressed separately regarding prognosis and treatment; however, no Phase III clinical trial data exist. Thus, treatment recommendations for patients with non-clear cell metastatic RCC (mRCC) remain unclear. We present first prospective data on choice of first- and second-line treatment in routine practice and outcome of patients with papillary mRCC. From the prospective German clinical cohort study (RCC-Registry), 99 patients with papillary mRCC treated with systemic first-line therapy between December 2007 and May 2017 were included. Prospectively enrolled patients who had started first-line treatment until May 15, 2016, were included into the outcome analyses (n = 82). Treatment was similar to therapies used for clear cell mRCC and consisted of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors and recently checkpoint inhibitors. Median progression-free survival from start of first-line treatment was 5.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-9.2) and median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.1-20.0). At data cutoff, 73% of the patients died, 6% were still observed, 12% were lost to follow-up, and 9% were alive at the end of the individual 3-year observation period. Despite the lack of prospective Phase III evidence in patients with papillary mRCC, our real-world data reveal effectiveness of systemic clear cell mRCC therapy in papillary mRCC. The prognosis seems to be inferior for papillary compared to clear cell mRCC. Further studies are needed to identify drivers of effectiveness of systemic therapy for papillary mRCC., (© 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Objectives: To characterize real-world prescribing patterns and their clinical and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) implications in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated in Germany., Methods: Eligible individuals were enrolled in the "Bundesverband der Betriebskrankenkassen" claims database and received targeted mRCC therapy between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2016. Prescribing patterns and HRU were characterized by treatment line and summarized by descriptive statistics. Proxy progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves., Results: 536 patients receiving mRCC treatment were included. The median treatment duration was 4.2 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.7-9.3) for first-line therapy and 3.8 months (IQR: 1.7-9.1) for second-line therapy. Median PFS and OS estimates were similar for the first- and second-line treatments: PFS, 7.4 versus 7.2 months; OS, 14.9 versus 13.6 months. Mean HRU costs were higher for patients receiving first-line therapy (€7,253.2) compared with those receiving second-line therapy (€6,242.9). Exploratory stratification of outcomes by centre expertise suggested a possible trend towards improved OS in the 10 most experienced centres versus all -others: first-line, 18.4 versus 13.2 months; second-line, 16.4 versus 12.4 months., Conclusions: In routine care, German clinicians make rational prescribing decisions; possible variations in outcomes between centres warrant further investigation., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Because the treatment landscape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved dramatically over the past decade, data on patients' treatment and outcomes in routine practice, so called "real-world data," are important to complement clinical trial data. We present choice of systemic first-/second-line treatments, number and sequences of treatment lines, and survival of patients with clear cell mRCC., Patients and Methods: A total of 1085 patients with clear cell mRCC who were recruited at the start of first-line treatment into the prospective German clinical cohort study (RCC-Registry) by 122 sites between December 2007 and May 2017 were analyzed., Results: The choice of first-/second-line treatment and changes over time reflect the chronologic approval of different targeted agents: from mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), to TKIs/mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors, to now TKIs/mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors/checkpoint inhibitor. The median first-line overall survival ranged from 7.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-10.9 months) in high MSKCC (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center) risk to 36.7 months (95% CI, 27.9-43.0 months) in low-risk patients. For trial-ineligible routine patients meeting common exclusion criteria of clinical trials, the median overall survival was 14.6 months (95% CI, 11.5-18.0 months) compared with 26.2 months (95% CI, 22.1-31.5 months) for potentially trial-eligible patients., Conclusion: This is the first prospective long-term cohort study showing changes in treatment reality and survival of routine patients with clear cell mRCC. Newly approved treatments are quickly applied in routine care. Patients with unfavorable prognosis, including trial-ineligible patients, have inferior outcomes. Survival times of potentially trial-eligible patients are similar to those reported from clinical trials., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To identify the prognostic impact of venous tumour thrombus (VTT) in locally advanced renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). To further differentiate the clinical course of patients with VTT who have similar clinicopathological characteristics., Patients and Methods: We determined the VTT consistency (solid vs friable) in a retrospective cohort of 200 patients with RCC who had undergone nephrectomy between 1994 and 2011. We examined the correlation of VTT consistency in these patients with clinical and pathological variables., Results: A total of 65% of the patients had solid VTT and 35% had friable VTT, which has a significantly lower amount of cell-cell adhesion molecules and connective tissue than solid VTT. We found that friable VTT was associated with advanced pT stage, higher VTT level, papillary RCC subtype and a lower age. Patients with friable VTT had a significantly shorter median overall survival than those with solid VTT (29 vs 89 months), but VTT consistency was not found to be an independent predictor of patients' survival in the multivariate Cox analysis. We found that VTT consistency was an independent significant predictor of overall survival in patients without evidence of distant and nodal metastases (N = 119)., Conclusions: The VTT consistency is caused by the tumour and not by different surgical handling. Friable VTT is an important adverse prognostic predictor of overall survival in patients with non-metastatic RCC., (© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.)

To provide complex experimental and clinical analysis of renal cell tumors, it is necessary to investigate this tumor entity interdisciplinarily. The aim of the German Renal Cell Tumor Network is to answer current problems through interdisciplinary cooperation among clinicians and basic researchers from different fields. It is thus now possible to analyze more than 500 well-characterized tumor samples using different techniques.

Background: Childhood renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) differ histologically and biologically from their adult counterparts. The characteristics of RCC-affected children and their tumors, the influence of treatment, and outcome have so far not been studied in a nonselected, population-based cohort., Methods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of RCC patients less than 16 years old reported to the German Childhood Cancer Registry and to the Kiel Paediatric Tumor Registry from 1980 to 2005., Results: Forty-nine RCC in children (24 boys, 25 girls) with a median age of 10.6 years were identified. In about every third child possibly RCC-related underlying disorders (tuberous sclerosis, neuroblastoma, teratoma with chemotherapy, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, chronic renal failure) or related diseases in their family were found. The pathologic subtypes were papillary in 16 (33%), translocation type in 11 (22%), unclassified in 8 (16%), and rarely clear-cell (n = 3) or others. Thirty-four (69%) patients had localized RCC, 8 (16%) patients regional lymph node metastases, and 4 (8%) patients distant metastases. Event-free survival and overall survival rates at 5 years were 96% for localized RCC, 69% and 75% for regional lymph node-positive, 25% and 33% for distant metastatic RCC, respectively. Two of 4 patients with distant metastases received immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and surgery, both are alive, 1 of them disease-free for 6.9 years., Conclusions: Pediatric RCCs are predominantly localized diseases. Children with RCC frequently suffer underlying disorders. Survival rates in localized and regional lymph node-positive cases are favorable. Because of the rarity of RCC in childhood, an international study is necessary., (Copyright 2006 American Cancer Society.)

The therapeutic regimen for metastatic renal cell cancer has changed substantially in the last years. Formerly, metastatic disease was regarded as being inoperable and had a disastrous prognosis. Nowadays, radical nephrectomy is the accepted urologic-oncologic standard therapy in metastatic primaries, if technically feasible. A complete resection of metastases may be curative, or can achieve a substantial palliative benefit. A better understanding of prognostic parameters helps in the selection of patients with a chance of benefiting from systemic immunochemotherapy. For patients with rapidly progressing tumors or sarcomatoid dedifferentiation, new effective chemotherapy regimens are available. New angiogenesis inhibitors such as sutent, avastin or sorafenib can potentially be effectively used in future therapeutic regimens.