1. Periprocedural anticoagulation during left atrial ablation: interrupted and uninterrupted vitamin K-antagonists or uninterrupted novel anticoagulants.
- Author
-
Brinkmeier-Theofanopoulou, Maria, Tzamalis, Panagiotis, Wehrkamp-Richter, Susan, Radzewitz, Andrea, Merkel, Matthias, Schymik, Gerhard, van Mark, Gesine, Bramlage, Peter, Schmitt, Claus, and Luik, Armin
- Subjects
ANTICOAGULANTS ,VITAMIN K ,ATRIAL fibrillation ,HEMORRHAGE ,THROMBOEMBOLISM ,ATRIAL fibrillation diagnosis ,THROMBOEMBOLISM prevention ,STROKE prevention ,CATHETER ablation ,COMPARATIVE studies ,DRUG administration ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,ORAL drug administration ,RESEARCH ,STROKE ,TIME ,EVALUATION research ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,CHEMICAL inhibitors ,DISEASE complications - Abstract
Background: There is a lack of data on anticoagulation requirements during ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study compares different oral anticoagulation (OAC) strategies to evaluate risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications.Methods: We conducted a single-centre study in patients undergoing left atrial ablation of AF. Three groups were defined: 1) bridging: interrupted vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA), INR ≤2, and bridging with heparin; 2) VKA: uninterrupted VKA and INR of > 2; 3) DOAC: uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants. Bleeding complications, thromboembolic events and peri-procedural heparin doses were assessed.Results: In total, 780 patients were documented. At 48 h, major complications were more common in the bridging group compared to uninterrupted VKA and DOAC groups (OR: 3.42, 95% CI: 1.29-9.10 and OR: 3.01, 95% CI: 1.19-7.61), largely driven by differences in major pericardial effusion (OR: 4.86, 95% CI: 1.56-15.99 and OR: 4.466, 95% CI, 1.52-13.67) and major vascular events (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 0.58-14.67 and OR: 9.72, 95% CI: 1.00-94.43). Uninterrupted VKAs and DOACs resulted in similar odds of major complications (overall OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.44-2.92), including cerebrovascular events (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.27-5.45). However, whereas only TIAs were observed in DOAC and bridging groups, strokes also occurred in the VKA group. Rates of minor complications (pericardial effusion, vascular complications, gastrointestinal hemorrhage) and major/minor groin hemorrhage were similar across groups.Conclusion: Our dataset illustrates that uninterrupted VKA and DOAC have a better risk-benefit profile than VKA bridging. Bridging was associated with a 4.5× increased risk of complications and should be avoided, if possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF