Search

Purpose: This study compares the objective American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) scores with the subjective Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) for patient outcome prediction., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy at the LMU Munich from June 2008 to June 2015. The study focused on associations between patient outcomes; treatment failures; known risk factors (including human papillomavirus [HPV] status and tumor stage); and the comorbidity indices ECOG-PS, ASA score, and ACE-27. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for survival analysis and identifying independent risk factors., Results: A total of 302 patients were analyzed, 175 received concurrent chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 61.8 months, and median age at diagnosis was 61 years. The 3‑ and 5‑year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 70.5%/60.2% and 64.7%/57.6%, respectively. Both ACE-27 and ASA showed significant correlations with OS in univariate and multivariate analyses, while ECOG-PS was significant only in univariate analysis. ASA and ACE-27 scores were also significantly correlated with local and locoregional recurrence, but only HPV status and tumor stage were significant in multivariate models., Conclusion: ACE-27 and ASA score effectively categorize patients' risks in adjuvant radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, proving more predictive of overall survival than ECOG-PS. These results underscore the importance of objective comorbidity assessment and suggest further prospective studies., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: S.N. Marschner, C. Maihöfer, R. Späth, E. Haehl, D. Reitz, N. Kienlechner, L. Schüttrumpf, P. Baumeister, U. Pflugradt, J. Heß, H. Zitzelsberger, K. Unger, C. Belka, and F. Walter declare that they have no competing interests. Ethical standards: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. A positive ethics vote (no. 448-13) of the local ethics committee (LMU Munich, Germany) was available in the context of the clinical cooperation group (KKG) “Personalized radiotherapy for head and neck tumors.” Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All patients are part of the adjuvant cohort of the clinical cooperation group “Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer,” which was separately published by Maihöfer et al. [9]., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Growing challenges in oncology require evolving educational methods and content. International efforts to reform oncology education are underway. Hands-on, interdisciplinary, and compact course formats have shown great effectiveness in the education of medical students. Our aim was to establish a new interdisciplinary one-week course on the principles of oncology using state-of-the-art teaching methods., Methods: In an initial survey, medical students of LMU Munich were questioned about their current level of knowledge on the principles of oncology. In a second two-stage survey, the increase in knowledge resulting from our recently established interdisciplinary one-week course was determined., Results: The medical students' knowledge of clinically important oncological topics, such as the diagnostic workup and interdisciplinary treatment options, showed a need for improvement. Knowledge of the major oncological entities was also in an expandable state. By attending the one-week course on the principles of oncology, students improved their expertise in all areas of the clinical workup in oncology and had the opportunity to close previous knowledge gaps. In addition, students were able to gain more in-depth clinical knowledge on the most common oncological entities., Conclusion: The interdisciplinary one-week course on the principles of oncology proved to be an effective teaching method to expand the knowledge of the future physicians to an appropriate level. With its innovative and interdisciplinary approach, the one-week course could be used as a showcase project for the ongoing development of medical education in Germany., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Implicit motives have a moderating effect on dishonest answering behaviour during the testing of applicants for disability pensions. Persons would rather act dishonest if they do not have do keep up their positive self-image therefore., Objective: Does a statement of truth at the beginning of a functional capacity evaluation lead to lower dishonest answering behaviour?, Methods: 248 applicants for a disability pension were randomly allocated to giving such a statement either before or after symptom validity tests (SIMS, BEVA)., Results: The statement of truth affected the SIMS but not the BEVA. The effect depended on the education level., Conclusion: Moral and social motives have to be taken into account when assessing malingering during a functional capacity evaluation. Higher educated persons refer to other moral standards or take a more individual and case-by-case approach to morally challenging situations., Competing Interests: Der Erstautor arbeitet bei der Deutschen Rentenversicherung. Alle Autoren geben an, keine Interessenkonflikte zu haben., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

The present study investigates whether the BEVA is suitable to detect negative response bias by claimants with psychosomatic symptoms in the social medical assessment. 107 claimants for disability pension to a psychosomatic disorder fulfilled the BEVA, SIMS and a sociodemographic questionnaire. The social medical examiners assess the credibility of the complaints representation. A Known-Group-Design and a Bootstrapping-Design was used to estimate the validity of the BEVA. For the external criterion SFSS the following psychometric characteristics for the BEVA could be determined: specificity=0.86, sensitivity=0.42, positive predictive value=0.81, negative predictive value=0.51. The interrater reliability estimates with Cohen κ=0.253. If the expert's assessments are chosen as external criterion following psychometric characteristics were estimated: specificity=0.71, sensitivity=0.32, positive predictive value=0.38, negative predictive value=0.66. The rater agreement is Cohen κ=0.031. The results show that the BEVA has an excellent specificity in the detection of negative response bias. This is highly desirable in terms of an ethically moral discussion. Furthermore, the study shows that - in addition to the expert estimates - further screenings can improve the assessment of negative response bias., Competing Interests: Interessenkonflikt: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background and Aim: Chronic-thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a serious complication of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). In untreated patients prognosis is poor. It depends on WHO-functional class. A delay from onset of symptoms and diagnosis can lead to a further worsening of prognosis. A pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice. We aimed to evaluate the time delay from onset of symptoms to diagnosis and the WHO-functional class at primary diagnosis in patients with CTEPH., Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from 70 monocentrically registered patients (48 women, 22 men, mean age 66,2 years  ±  13,8 years) with confirmed CTEPH from the pulmonary hypertension expert center Missionsärztliche Klinik. Diagnostic work-up was performed according to the current guidelines., Results: Mean delay from onset of symptoms to diagnosis of CTEPH was 18 ± 26 months. Time delay was only slightly shorter in patients with a history of PE (n = 56; 81 %) than in patients without a history of PE (n = 13; 19 %): 16,9  ±  23,8 vs. 23,5  ±  36,9 months. Time delay was higher in patients who received vasoactive medication before the first contact with a PH expert center and in patients who were classified as technically not suitable for a thrombendarterectomy. 38 patients with a history of acute PE did not have a period without symptoms. In 18 patients symptoms had transiently gone after PE. More than 70 % presented in WHO functional class III or IV., Conclusion: Time delay between onset of symptoms and diagnosis of CTEPH and referral to a PH expert center is long and the majority of patients presented in WHO-functional class III or IV. Prognosis is poor in untreated patients and getting worse with a higher WHO-functional class. For this reason, and because CTEPH can be cured by a pulmonary endarterectomy, each patient with suspected PH should be referred to a PH expert center to exclude CTEPH., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Radiotherapy is generally accepted as a standard treatment for early-stage testicular seminoma. Relapse rates of 2% to 5% in clinical stage I and 10% to 20% in stage IIA/B (according to the Royal Marsden classification) can be achieved. Disease-specific survival reaches 100%. With such excellent cure rates, treatment-related side effects gain particular importance. Therefore, a prospective multicenter trial was initiated for radiotherapy of testicular seminoma with limited treatment portals and low total doses of irradiation. In clinical stage I, 483 patients were treated with 26 Gy to the para-aortic region only. In stage IIA, 42 patients and, in stage IIB, 18 patients received irradiation to the para-aortic and high iliac lymph nodes with 30 and 36 Gy, respectively. With a median time to follow-up of 55 months for stage I and 55.5 months for stage IIA/B, there were 18 (3.7%) and 4 (6.7%) cases of relapse in both treatment groups. Disease-specific survival was 99.6% in stage I and 100% in stage IIA/B. Acute toxicity was dominated by moderate gastro-intestinal side effects. No major late toxicity has been observed to date. Limited volume pure para-aortic treatment for stage I and para-aortic/high iliac irradiation for stage IIA/B with 26, 30 and 36 Gy, respectively, yields excellent cure rates with only moderate acute toxicity and is therefore recommended as standard treatment.