Search

Inhaled epinephrine is a potential alternative to self-administered intramuscular epinephrine in imminent anaphylactic reactions. The objective was to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model describing exposure and effects on heart rate of inhaled epinephrine. Data from a 4-phase cross-over clinical trial in 9 healthy volunteers including 0.3 mg intramuscular epinephrine, two doses of inhaled epinephrine (4 mg/mL solution administered during [mean] 18 and 25 min, respectively) using a mobile pocket inhaler, and an inhaled placebo were analyzed using mixed-effects modeling. Inhaled epinephrine was available almost immediately and more rapidly than via the intramuscular route (absorption half-live 29 min). Epinephrine plasma concentrations declined rapidly after terminating inhalation (elimination half-life 4.1 min) offering the option to stop exposure in case of adverse events. While the expected maximum concentration was higher for inhaled epinephrine, this was not associated with safety concerns due to only moderate additional hemodynamic effects compared to intramuscular administration. Bioavailability after inhalation (4.7%) was subject to high interindividual and interoccasional variability highlighting that training of inhalation would be essential for patients. The proposed model suggests that the use of a highly concentrated epinephrine solution via inhalation may offer an effective treatment option in anaphylaxis, while efficacy in patients remains to be shown., (Copyright © 2015 The Japanese Society for the Study of Xenobiotics. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Intramuscular (L-)epinephrine is used as self-medication for serious hypersensitivity reactions. Inhalative administration has the theoretical advantage of a more rapid absorption and better controllability., Objectives: The current trial was conducted to explore pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two nebulized inhalative epinephrine doses (4 mg and 8 mg in aqueous solution) using a mobile pocket inhaler relative to intramuscular administration (0.3 mg) and placebo., Methods: This randomized, open-label, change-over pilot study involved eight young healthy men and women. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were calculated from epinephrine plasma concentrations and hemodynamic parameters., Results: Mean exposure to epinephrine decreased from the 8 mg dose to the 4 mg inhalative dose, and further with the 0.3 mg intramuscular dose, with active treatments showing significantly higher concentrations than placebo (geometric mean area under the curve AUC0-t(last) values: 282, 236, 204 and 81.6 hr*ng/L). Maximal concentrations were reached within approximately 15 min for all active treatments. Epinephrine effects for inhalative administrations on heart rates were significantly higher than those for the intramuscular or placebo administration, while no excessive effects occurred. Pronounced overall variability prohibited a definite assessment of relative bioavailability between treatments. However, results indicated that epinephrine concentrations obtained following the 8 mg inhalative dose were not inferior to those after 0.3 mg i.m., Conclusions: A relevant fraction of moist inhalation epinephrine doses is absorbed and mediates systemic effects. This suggests that administration of epinephrine via a suitable pocket inhaler device may be beneficial in ambulatory emergency treatment of systemic hypersensitivity reactions. EudraCT number: 2010-021493-11.

Objective: Disorders of steroid hormone metabolism might be related to the etiology of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver (FNH), a benign tumor, especially prevalent in women. The cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) enzyme is implicated in the bioactivation of multiple precarcinogens as well as in the metabolism of steroids. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1 have been associated with altered catalytic activity in the hydroxylation of sex hormones and this may account for interindividual variability in exposure to hormone-mediated cell proliferation signals and reactive steroid metabolites. In the study at hand, we aimed to evaluate a possible association between CYP1A1*1, *2A, *2B, and *4 alleles and FNH., Method: Genotyping of 26 affected female patients of Caucasian origin was carried out using PCR/RFLP., Results: Allele frequencies for the CYP1A1 variants *2A, *2B and *4 in 26 female patients with FNH were 0.058, 0.019 and 0.058, respectively. Crude odds ratios for the individual alleles were 0.75 (95% CI 0.23-2.44), 0.72 (95% CI 0.10-5.34) and 1.96 (95% CI 0.59-6.50), respectively. There were no significant differences between these values and corresponding allele frequencies obtained in a large German sample of unaffected Caucasian women., Conclusion: The present data do not suggest a relevant association between CYP1A1 polymorphisms and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver in female Caucasians.