Search

Simple Summary: For multiple myeloma (MM) patients with measurable disease, there is no recommendation to monitor serum free light chains during therapy. However, this could provide important information in terms of prognosis. We investigated the prognostic impact of serum free light chain ratio (FLCr) normalization in 590 patients with secretory MM during first-line treatment within the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group MM5 trial. We are able to show that there is an increasing percentage of patients who achieve FLCr normalization during therapy. Importantly, we demonstrate that FLCr normalization at any time before the start of maintenance is significantly associated with prolonged progression-free and overall survival in multivariable time-dependent Cox regression analyses. This suggests that FLCr normalization during therapy is an important and simple way to assess prognostic factor in MM and supports the serial measurement of serum free light chains during therapy, even in patients with secretory MM. We investigated the prognostic impact of time-dependent serum free light chain ratio (FLCr) normalization in 590 patients with secretory multiple myeloma (MM) during first-line treatment within the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group MM5 trial. Serum free light chains (sFLC) were assessed by the Freelite test at baseline, after induction, mobilization, autologous blood stem cell transplantation, consolidation and every three months during maintenance or follow up within two years after the start of maintenance. The proportion of patients with a normal or normalized FLCr increased from 3.6% at baseline to 23.2% after induction and 64.7% after consolidation. The achievement of FLCr normalization at any one time before the start of maintenance was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.01, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.47–0.79) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.02, HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48–0.93) in multivariable time-dependent Cox regression analyses. Furthermore, reaching immune reconstitution, defined as the normalization of uninvolved immunoglobulins, before maintenance was associated with superior PFS (p = 0.04, HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.60–0.99) and OS (p = 0.01, HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.41–0.86). We conclude that FLCr normalization during therapy is an important favorable prognostic factor in MM. Therefore, we recommend serial measurements of sFLC during therapy until achieving FLCr normalization, even in patients with secretory MM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer represents a significant economic burden for the German health care system. The available chemotherapy regimens have significantly different medical and economic profiles., Methods: A modeling study based on published clinical trials was performed to assess costs of 5 different regimens (Mayo Clinic, LV5FU2, FOLFOX-4, Xelox, Capecitabine) from the perspective of the statutory sickness funds. Costs were calculated based on the assumption that patients were treated exactly according to a standardized clinical pathway., Results: Total costs are highest for FOLFOX-4 (H22,034/patient) and Xelox (H21,411). Lowest costs of the oxaliplatin-free treatments are associated with capecitabine (H4,935), followed by the Mayo Clinic (H6,426) and LV5FU2 protocols (H8,336). The main driver of costs in all instances is drug acquisition (90% of total costs), whereas costs of diagnostics or complications have no major impact (0.5-2%)., Conclusions: In Germany, FOLFOX-4 is the most effective but also the most expensive treatment and represents the current standard. Xelox emerges as a slightly less costly alternative when oral treatment is preferred. For patients not able to tolerate oxaliplatin-based therapy, capecitabine has the best economic profile of all alternative regimens. Drug acquisition costs are by far the most important factor driving costs in all regimens.