Search

Background: Airway management with supraglottic airway devices (SGA) in life-threatening emergencies in children is increasingly being used. Different specifications of laryngeal masks (LM) and the laryngeal tube (LT) are commonly used devices for this purpose. We present a literature review and interdisciplinary consensus statement of different societies on the use of SGA in pediatric emergency medicine. Material and methods: Literature review in the PubMed database and classification of studies according to the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. Levels and consensus finding within the group of authors. Results: The evidence for successful applications of the various types of LM is significantly higher than for LT application. Reported smaller series of successful applications of LT are currently limited to selected research groups and centers. Especially for children below 10 kg body weight there currently exists insufficient evidence for the successful application of the LT and therefore its routine use cannot be recommended. SGAs used for emergencies should have a gastric drainage possibility. Discussion: Considering the scientific data and the large clinical experience with the LM in medical routine and emergency situations in children currently only the LM can be recommended for alternative (i.e., non-intubation) emergency airway management in children. If alternative airway management is part of a local emergency strategy, the LM should be provided in all pediatric sizes (1, 1½, 2, 2½, 3) for out of hospital use and in hospital emergency use and all users should regularly be trained in its application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Several studies have described the successful application of extraglottic airways by lay people to a phantom., Objectives: This study examined the influence of the training method on the success of the application., Methods: A total of 150 visitors of a shopping mall were asked to place an i‑gel laryngeal mask (Intersurgical GmbH, Sankt Augustin, Germany) on a manikin. The short instruction was randomized and performed either as a practical demonstration or through the self-study of an illustrated manual., Results: Application success in the first attempt was 95.8 % for the practical demonstration group and 78.5 % for the written instruction group (p = 0.001). Placement times were also significantly different (median 11.5 s vs. 22.5 s, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Learning success can be achieved with both training methods. Initially, a hands-on training should be carried out with a practical demonstration.