Search

Background: Total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the most commonly performed routine procedures in the world. Prognostic studies indicate that the number of TKR will further increase constituting growing burden on healthcare systems. There is also substantial regional heterogeneity in TKR rates within and between countries. Despite the known therapeutic effects, a subset of patients undergoing TKR does not benefit from the procedure as intended. To improve the appropriateness of TKR indication, the EKIT initiative ("evidence and consensus based indication critera for total arthroplasty") developed a clinical guideline for Germany on the indication of TKR. This guideline is the basis for a digital medical decision aid (EKIT tool) to facilitate shared decision making (SDM) in order to improve decision quality for elective surgery. The aim of this cluster randomized trial is to investigate the effectiveness of the EKIT tool on decision quality.Methods: The Value-based TKR study is a prospective pragmatic multi-center, stepped wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial (SW-RCT). The EKIT tool provides (1) a systematic presentation of individual patient and disease-specific information (symptoms, expectations), (2) the fulfillment of the indication criteria and (3) health information about safety and effectiveness of TKR. All study sites will follow routine care as control clusters until the start of the intervention. In total, there will be 10 clusters (study sites) and 6 sequential steps over 16 month, with clusters receiving the intervention with a minimum 2 months of standard routine care. The primary outcome is patients' decision quality measured with the Decision Quality Instrument (DQI)-Knee Osteoarthritis questionnaire. Furthermore, we will collect information on global patient satisfaction, patient reported outcome measures and the fulfilment of the individual expectations 12 months after SDM. The power calculation yielded an estimated power of 89% using robust Poisson regression under the following assumptions: 10 study sites with a total of N=1,080 patients (including a dropout rate of 11%), a 10% increase in decision quality due to the use of the EKIT tool, and a significance level of 5%.Discussion: There is a high potential for transferring the intervention into routine practice if the evaluation is positive.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04837053 . Registered on 08/04/2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the utilization of physical therapy (PT) and predictors for its use in individuals with osteoarthritis (OA) while focusing on sociodemographic and disease-related factors.Methods: For this cross-sectional study, 657,807 patients (age 30-79 years) diagnosed with hip, knee, or polyarticular OA were identified in claims data. In 2016, a questionnaire including information on disease status, demography, and socioeconomics was sent to a random sample of 8,995 patients stratified by sex, age, and type of diagnosis. Claims data from 2016 included the utilization and type of PT, as well as the prescribing medical specialist, and were linked to questionnaire data. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to determine variables associated with the use of PT.Results: In total, 3,564 (40%) patients completed the questionnaire and agreed to linking questionnaire and claims data (69% female, mean age 66.5 years). In 2016, 50% of the study population received PT at least once, and women received it more frequently than men (53% versus 43%). Most PT was prescribed by orthopedists (45%) and general practitioners (32%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that women, higher household income, having both hip and knee OA, lower functional status, higher disease activity, and individuals living in the eastern, southern, and western states of Germany were associated with an increased utilization of PT.Conclusion: Considering current guideline recommendations and that more than one-third of OA patients with high functional impairment and/or pain did not receive PT in the last 12 months, there is considerable potential for improvement. This is especially true for men and individuals with a low income. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET) was developed in order to investigate the health-related quality of life of patients with meniscal pathologies. The aim of the present study was to translate and validate the WOMET into German.Methods: A standardized forward backward translation of the WOMET into German was first performed. One hundred ninety-two patients with isolated meniscal tears completed the German version of the WOMET as well as the Western Ontario McMasters University Arthritis Index, and the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Furthermore, reliability, construct validity, feasibility, internal consistency, ceiling, and floor effects were then calculated.Results: Excellent feasibility (85.4% fully complete questionnaire), internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92), and test-retest reliability (ICC, r = 0.90) were found. The standard error of measurement and the minimal detectable change were ±4.6 and 12.7 points, respectively. All predefined hypothesises were confirmed. No floor or ceiling effects were found.Conclusions: The presented German version of the WOMET is a valid and reliable tool for investigating the health-related quality of life of German-speaking patients with meniscal pathologies.Level Of Evidence: Cross-sectional study, Level II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Realignment osteotomies of valgus knee deformities are usually performed at the distal femur, as valgus alignment is considered to be a femoral-based deformity. This dogma, however, has not been proven in a large patient population. Valgus malalignment may also be caused by a tibial deformity or a combined tibial and femoral deformity. Purpose: The purposes of this study were (1) to analyze the coronal geometry of patients with valgus malalignment and identify the location of the underlying deformity and (2) to investigate the proportion of cases that require realignment osteotomy at the tibia, the femur, or both locations to avoid an oblique joint line. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The analysis included 420 standing full-leg radiographs of patients with valgus malalignment (mechanical femorotibial angle [mFTA], ≥4°). A systematic analysis of the coronal leg geometry was performed including the mFTA, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and joint-line convergence angle (JLCA). The localization of the deformity was determined according to the malalignment test described by Paley, and patients were assigned to 1 of 4 groups: femoral-based valgus deformity, tibial-based valgus deformity, femoral- and tibial-based valgus deformity, or intra-articular/ligamentary–based valgus deformity. Subsequently, the ideal osteotomy site was identified with the goal of a postoperative change of the joint line of two different maximum values, ±2° and ±4°, from its physiological varus position of 3°. Results: Measurements of the coronal alignment revealed a mean (±SD) mFTA of 7.4° ± 4.3° (range, 4°-28.2°). The mean mLDFA and mean mMPTA were 84.8° ± 2.4° and 90.9° ± 2.6°, respectively. The mean JLCA was 1.2° ± 3.1°. The majority (41.0%) of valgus deformities were tibial based, 23.6% were femoral based, 26.9% were femoral and tibial based, and 8.6% were intra-articular/ligamentary based. To achieve a straight-leg axis and an anatomic postoperative joint line with a tolerance of ±4°, the ideal site of a corrective osteotomy was tibial in 55.2% of cases and femoral in 19.5% of cases. A double-level osteotomy would be necessary in 25.2% of cases. With a tolerance of ±2°, the ideal osteotomy site was the proximal tibia in 41.0% of cases and the distal femur in 13.6% of cases; a double-level osteotomy would be necessary in 45.5% of cases. Conclusion: In contrast to the widespread belief that valgus malalignment is usually caused by a femoral deformity, this study found that valgus malalignment was attributable to tibial deformity in the majority of patients. In addition, a combined femoral- and tibial-based deformity was more common than an isolated femoral-based deformity. As a clinical consequence, varus osteotomies to treat lateral compartment osteoarthritis must be performed at the tibial site or as a double-level osteotomy in a relevant number of patients to avoid an oblique joint line. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to analyze the different causes of symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip joint in active duty soldiers requiring a total hip arthroplasty and the hypothesis that soldiers had a reduced prevalence of secondary OA as a result of a selection process that has taken place through multiple medical assessments during their military career. We analyzed patient records from 2006 to 2012 for male patients ≤60 years with OA of the hip and indication for total hip arthroplasty in a military hospital in which civilian patients are also treated. About 44 military patients (MP) and 69 civilian patients (CP) were included. The prevalence of different causes of OA of the hip did not differ significantly in both groups (primary OA MP: 59.1% [n = 26], CP: 56.5% [n = 39]; dysplasia MP: 25.0% [n = 11], CP: 24.6% [n = 17]; femoral head necrosis MP: 11.4% [n = 5], CP: 13% [n = 9]; post-traumatic OA MP: 4.5% [n = 2], CP: 5.8% [n = 4]). In conclusion, recurrent medical assessments that are usually based alone on clinical examinations were not able to reduce the prevalence of prearthrotic deformities as a joint-specific risk factor for the development of symptomatic hip OA in our military collective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose was to investigate whether patient-specific factors (PSF) and surgically modifiable factors (SMF), measured by means of a computer-assisted navigation system, can predict the Knee Society Scores (KSS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods: Data from 99 patients collected during a randomized clinical trial were used for this secondary data analysis. The KSS scores of the patients were measured preoperatively and at 4-years follow-up. Multiple regression analyses were performed to investigate which combination of variables would be the best to predict the 4-years KSS scores.Results: When considering SMF alone the combination of four of them significantly predicted the 4-years KSS-F score (p = 0.009), explaining 18 % of its variation. When considering only PSF the combination of age and body weight significantly predicted the 4-years KSS-F (p = 0.008), explaining 11 % of its variation. When considering both groups of predictors simultaneously the combination of three PSF and two SMF significantly predicted the 4-years KSS-F (p = 0.007), explaining 20 % of its variation.Conclusions: Younger age, better preoperative KSS-F scores and lower BMI before surgery, a positive tibial component slope and small changes in femoral offset were predictors of better KSS-F scores at 4-years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common cause of disability in the elderly. Clinical frailty is associated with high mortality, but few studies have explored the relationship between OA and frailty. The objective of this study was to consider the association between OA and frailty/pre-frailty in an elderly population comprised of six European cohorts participating in the EPOSA project.Methods: Longitudinal study using baseline data and first follow-up waves, from EPOSA; 2,455 individuals aged 65-85 years were recruited from pre-existing population-based cohorts in Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Data were collected on clinical OA at any site (hand, knee or hip), based on the clinical classification criteria developed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). Frailty was defined according to Fried's criteria. The covariates considered were age, gender, educational level, obesity and country. We used multinomial logistic regression to analyse the associations between OA, frailty/pre-frailty and other covariates.Results: The overall prevalence of clinical OA at any site was 30.4 % (95 % CI:28.6-32.2); frailty was present in 10.2 % (95 % CI:9.0-11.4) and pre-frailty in 51.0 % (95 % CI:49.0-53.0). The odds of frailty was 2.96 (95 % CI:2.11-4.16) and pre-frailty 1.54 (95 % CI:1.24-1.91) as high among OA individuals than those without OA. The association remained when Knee OA, hip OA or hand OA were considered separately, and was stronger in those with increasing number of joints.Conclusions: Clinical OA is associated with frailty and pre-frailty in older adults in European countries. This association might be considered when designing appropriate intervention strategies for OA management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study on survival rates after combined osteochondral autologous transfer (OAT) and valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in young and active patients with symptomatic osteochondral defects of the medial femoral condyle and concomitant varus malalignment. It mentions deep osteochondral defects of the medial femoral condyle in young patients that might lead to early osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Results showed combined OAT and valgus HTO can treat the disease.

Objective. To determine the diagnostic value of colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) vs non-inflammatory disease (e.g. OA) of the knee joint.Methods. Standardized CDUS examinations were performed in 111 knee joints of 106 patients (70 women and 36 men) presenting with severe OA (n = 72) or confirmed IA (n = 39) of one or both knee joints to determine the degree of synovial inflammation in a semiquantitative fashion. To definitely distinguish inflammatory from non-inflammatory disease, SF was obtained from every patient within 24 h after sonography and analysed SFs containing &leq;1000 white blood cells (WBC)/µl were considered non-inflammatory, whereas &geq;5000 WBC/µl were classified as inflammatory.Results. The CDUS sum score of OA patients was determined to be 3.3 (range 0–8). In contrast, IA patients exhibited significantly elevated synovitis score of 5.3 (range 3–9) (P < 0.001). However, high synovial CDUS activity could be observed in OA patients sporadically. Therefore, there is no definitive CDUS threshold that clearly separates OA from IA patients.Conclusion. CDUS is a valuable instrument to assist clinicians in distinguishing OA from IA of the knee joint, but nevertheless should always be interpreted within the clinical context. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective. Haemochromatosis arthropathy is a secondary OA and the most frequent and earliest clinical presentation of hereditary haemochromatosis (HH). The aim of this study was to perform a direct clinical, functional and radiographic comparison with idiopathic hand OA (HOA) to unravel important differences between these clinical entities. Methods. In total, 299 patients (141 with HH arthropathy of the hands and 158 patients with idiopathic HOA) were recruited. Structured clinical assessment including hand function tests, as well as hand radiographs with scoring according to Kellgren-Lawrence, were carried out in all patients. Results. HH arthropathy and HOA differed significantly: patients with HH arthropathy were younger and predominantly male as compared with HOA. In males but not females, HH arthropathy led to an earlier start of symptoms than in HOA. Patients with HOA had more tender joints and worse hand function than patients with HH arthropathy, although subjective measures of joint pain and function were similar. MCP and wrist joint involvement was more frequent and severe in HH arthropathy, while HOA patients more frequently had degenerative changes in the first CMC as well as PIP and DIP joints. Conclusion. HH arthropathy and idiopathic HOA differ significantly in terms of epidemiology, localization, severity of symptoms and radiographic changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study which revealed that the presence of angular characteristics of spatial chondrocyte organization can be used to diagnose the onset of preclinical osteoarthritis (OA). It explains the methods used by the study, which included digitally recording the nuclei of superficial chondrocytes in top-down views, and Cartesian coordinates to analyze the images. Also discussed in detail are the results of the study.

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common condition that is often associated with chronic pain. Pain often leads patients to seek healthcare advice and treatment. In this retrospective cohort analysis of German longitudinal healthcare claims data, we aimed to explore the healthcare resource utilisation (HRU) and related healthcare costs for patients with OA who develop chronic pain., Methods: Patient-level data was extracted from the German Institut für Angewandte Gesundheitsforschung (InGef) database. Insured persons (≥18 years) were indexed between January 2015 and December 2017 with a recent (none in the last 2 years) diagnosis of OA. HRU and costs were compared between patients categorised as with (identified via diagnosis or opioid prescription) and without chronic pain. Unweighted HRU (outpatient physician contacts, hospitalisations, prescriptions for physical therapy or psychotherapy, and incapacity to work) and healthcare costs (medication, medical aid/remedy, psychotherapy, inpatient and outpatient and sick pay in Euros [quartile 1, quartile 3]) were calculated per patient for the year following index. Due to potential demographic and comorbidity differences between the groups, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to estimate weighted costs and rate ratio (RR; 95% confidence interval) of HRU by negative binomial regression modelling., Results: Of 4,932,543 individuals sampled, 238,306 patients with OA were included in the analysis: 80,055 (34%) categorised as having chronic pain (24,463 via opioid prescription) and 158,251 (66%) categorised as not having chronic pain. The chronic pain cohort was slightly older, more likely to be female, and had more comorbidities. During the year following index, unweighted and IPTW-weighted HRU risk and healthcare costs were higher in patients with chronic pain vs those without for all categories. This led to a substantially higher total annual healthcare cost ─ observed mean; €6801 (1439, 8153) vs €3682 (791, 3787); estimated RR = 1.51 (1.36, 1.66)., Conclusions: German patients with chronic pain and OA have higher healthcare costs and HRU than those with OA alone. Our findings suggest the need for better prevention and treatment of OA in order to reduce the incidence of chronic pain, and the resultant increase in disease burden experienced by patients.

Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major reason for chronic pain, stiffness, and functional limitation. This study was undertaken to analyze factors associated with the burden of OA, taking the pattern of joint involvement into account., Methods: From a random sample of 8,995 patients with OA (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, German Modification codes M15 [polyarticular], M16 [hip], or M17 [knee]) from a German statutory health insurance database, 3,564 patients completed a survey including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Patients with knee, hip, concomitant hip and knee, or polyarticular manifestation were compared concerning pain, stiffness, function, and impact on work and personal life. Data were linked to dispensation records. The association of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), symptom duration, and the World Health Organization-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5) with WOMAC results was assessed in multiple linear regression models., Results: Patients with knee (n = 1,448), hip (n = 959), hip and knee (n = 399), or polyarthritic (n = 758) OA were included. Concomitant hip and knee OA was accompanied by the highest WOMAC values (mean 44), frequent impairment of personal life (75%), and the highest use of analgesics (52% nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, 22% opioids, and 37% others). In the regression analyses, BMI per 5 units and WHO-5 per 10% worsening were associated with an increase in WOMAC values of 4-5 points, irrespective of the joint manifestations., Conclusion: Disease burden is high in patients with concomitant hip and knee OA and is connected with frequent prescription of analgesics. Involvement of several joints, BMI, and depressive symptoms need to be considered when using the WOMAC as an outcome instrument., (© 2019 The Authors. Arthritis Care & Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Background: The objective of the research consortium PROCLAIR was to gain population level knowledge on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) and osteoarthritis (OA) in Germany., Aims: A main question of the consortium was whether it is possible to identify groups of people who were exposed to a particular risk of undersupply or oversupply of treatment. In addition, the study investigated the validity of claims data for these diseases as a basis for further studies., Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional surveys were carried out among insurees of the BARMER statutory health insurance fund whose claims data included RA, axSpA and OA diagnoses. The questionnaire data were linked with the claims data of the insured persons if they agreed., Results: In all three diseases risk groups for care deficits could be identified. Persons with RA who are not treated by a specialist have less access to drug treatment. Physical therapy is prescribed for all three diagnoses at a low level, even for people undergoing joint replacement surgery. A connection between depressive symptoms and disease activity or function in axSpA was shown. In addition to the results relevant to care, the PROCLAIR network has also made contributions to critically assess the quality of health insurance data., Discussion: The combination of billing data with survey data enables a comprehensive description of the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. Particularly relevant factors are the specialization of the physician, sociodemographic parameters of the patients and the region of residence. In particular, access to treatment cannot be investigated in randomized clinical trials.

Background: Little is known about the utilization of individual health services performed by a physician (IGeL) and the services and supplements provided outside a doctor's office (MuPaP) for osteoarthritis patients., Objectives: The aims of this study are to analyze the use of osteoarthritis-specific IGeL and MuPaP as well as predictors for their utilization., Materials and Methods: For this cross-sectional study, claims data was used to identify all persons with hip, knee, or polyarticular osteoarthritis in 2014 (n = 657,807). A random sample (n = 8995) was sent a questionnaire about their usage of IGeL and MuPaP. Furthermore, the type of physicians conducting or recommending services was evaluated. Applying multivariable logistic regression, predictors associated with the utilization of IGeL, MuPaP, and overall individual health services were analyzed., Results: After validating the data and osteoarthritis diagnosis, 2363 persons were enrolled (mean age: 65.5 years, 72% female). In the last 12 months, 39% of patients had used at least one IGeL (MuPaP: 76%), with 86% being primarily performed by orthopedists (MuPaP: 88% patient self-motivated). Knee osteoarthritis was associated with increased utilization of IGeL. Having female gender, higher income, residence in Western Germany, higher disease burden, and lower satisfaction with the healthcare system were influences on the use of overall individual health services., Conclusions: Since patients with high disease burden in particular tend to use these therapies with varying treatment success, detailed information, especially about the risks and existing evidence, should be a prerequisite for trustworthy doctor-patient relationships.

Objective: The introduction of a stemless prosthesis in shoulder arthroplasty represents a novel design whereby the proximal humerus is restored anatomically, while leaving the diaphysis of the humerus untouched. The aim of this study was to present the mid-term results of total evolutive shoulder system (TESS; Biomet ® ), a stemless shoulder prosthesis., Methods: The study included 38 consecutive patients (18 men and 20 women; mean age: 66 years; range: 55-81 years) treated with shoulder arthroplasty between 2009 and 2011 with TESS for primary glenohumeral arthritis. Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) was performed in 28 cases (74%), hemi-shoulder arthroplasty (HSA) in 10 (26%). Constant score, active range of motion, patient satisfaction rate, and radiological assessment were analyzed. Mean time of follow-up was 37 months., Results: Constant score improved from 21.8 points (28.6 adjusted for age) preoperatively to 74.1 points (86.6 adjusted for age) postoperatively. Active range of motion increased significantly from the pre- to postoperative status. Eighty-nine percent were very satisfied or satisfied with shoulder replacement surgery. One cemented glenoid was revised due to aseptic loosening. None of the components were found to be loose at the final follow-up. No signs of stress shielding were seen., Conclusions: This study shows promising results of this implant concept in the short- to mid-term. These results are comparable with the results achieved with long-established arthroplasty designs., Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study., (Copyright © 2019 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The Osteoarthritis Quality of Life scale (OAQoL) is specific to individuals with osteoarthritis. The present study describes the adaptation of the OAQoL for use in the following five European languages: German, Hungarian, Italian, Spanish and Turkish. The study involved three stages in each language; translation, cognitive debriefing (face and content validity) and validation. The validation stage assessed internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), reproducibility (test-retest reliability using Spearman's rank correlations), convergent and divergent validity (correlations with the Health Assessment Questionnaire, The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of osteoarthritis and Nottingham Health Profile) and known group validity. The OAQoL was successfully translated into the target languages with minimal problems. Cognitive debriefing interviewees found the measures easy to complete and identified few problems with content. Internal consistency ranged from 0.94 to 0.97 and test-retest reliability (reproducibility) from 0.87 to 0.98. These values indicate that the new language versions produce very low levels of measurement error. Median OAQoL scores were higher for patients reporting a current flare of osteoarthritis in all countries. Scores were also related, as expected, to perceived severity of osteoarthritis. The OAQoL was successfully adapted for use in Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain and Turkey. The addition of these new language versions will prove valuable to multinational clinical trials and to clinical practice in the respective countries.

The therapy of osteoarthritis is based on conservative therapeutic approaches, depending on the disease's severity. In this context, physical therapy and the use of sufficient analgesic regimes are of decisive importance. This article will discuss the current evidence based therapeutic concepts as well as promising new therapeutic approaches., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Traditional Indian Ayurvedic medicine uses complex treatment approaches, including manual therapies, lifestyle and nutritional advice, dietary supplements, medication, yoga, and purification techniques. Ayurvedic strategies are often used to treat osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee; however, no systematic data are available on their effectiveness in comparison with standard care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of complex Ayurvedic treatment in comparison with conventional methods of treating OA symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis.Methods and Design: In a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 150 patients between 40 and 70 years, diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee, following American College of Rheumatology criteria and an average pain intensity of ≥40 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale in the affected knee at baseline will be randomized into two groups. In the Ayurveda group, treatment will include tailored combinations of manual treatments, massages, dietary and lifestyle advice, consideration of selected foods, nutritional supplements, yoga posture advice, and knee massage. Patients in the conventional group will receive self-care advice, pain medication, weight-loss advice (if overweight), and physiotherapy following current international guidelines. Both groups will receive 15 treatment sessions over 12 weeks. Outcomes will be evaluated after 6 and 12 weeks and 6 and 12 months. The primary endpoint is a change in the score on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) after 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measurements will use WOMAC subscales, a pain disability index, a visual analog scale for pain and sleep quality, a pain experience scale, a quality-of-life index, a profile of mood states, and Likert scales for patient satisfaction, patient diaries, and safety. Using an adapted PRECIS scale, the trial was identified as lying mainly in the middle of the efficacy-effectiveness continuum.Discussion: This trial is the first to compare the effectiveness of a complex Ayurvedic intervention with a complex conventional intervention in a Western medical setting in patients with knee osteoarthritis. During the trial design, aspects of efficacy and effectiveness were discussed. The resulting design is a compromise between rigor and pragmatism.Trial Registration: NCT01225133. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite its wide use in clinical outcome measurement, there is yet no validated German language version of the AOFAS-AHS available. After finishing cross-cultural adaption of the AOFAS-AHS according to the AAOS guidelines, an analysis of agreement was carried out., Methods: This was done by means of the 18-item Foot Function Index in its validated German translation by Naal et al. (FFI-D). The results of 91 orthopedic patients as well as healthy persons in both scores were then compared intraindividually. The cohort consisted of 46 individuals with hindfoot disorders and 45 persons without any hindfoot complaints. The FFI-D-Score was linearly transformed in the range 0-100 points of the AOFAS., Results: Encouraging correlation was then found for the patients with hindfoot disorders (Spearman's correlation 0.73 (95% CI 0.52-0.85); a median deviation of -2 points (interquartile range -13 points; +13 points) in patients with hindfoot disorders implied good median intraindividual score concordance. However, with 30 of these 46 patients showing score deviations beyond or below a pre-specified ±10 points range of clinically tolerable deviations, the scores cannot be considered exchangeable., Conclusion: Although the agreement analysis was performed for the German translation of the two questionnaires, analogous results can be expected also for other languages. It should be noted that the results do not allow for judging which of the scores is better suited to give a valid statement on patient outcome in treatment of hindfoot disorders. To verify which of these two scores is better suited to represent hindfoot-dysfunction a subsequent study using instrumental gait analysis and surface EMG is being carried out.

The term musculoskeletal condition (MSKC) comprises inflammatory and degenerative diseases of joints and bones. They are among the most common conditions in older age and cause of severe long-term pain, physical disability, and decrease in quality of life. Data from the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1) were used to estimate the life-time prevalence of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoporosis in Germany. A total of 7,988 persons aged 18-79 years (osteoporosis 50-79 years) were asked to report doctor-diagnosed MSKC in face-to-face interviews. Women were more likely to report all MSKC and all prevalences increase with age. Osteoarthritis is reported by 22.3 % of women and 18.1 % of men, RA by 3.2 % of women and 1.9 % of men, and osteoporosis by 13.1 % of women and 3.2 % of men. MSKC are of great relevance for older adults in Germany. Data from DEGS1 provide a lot of information along to MSKC and hereby allow a closer description of the health situation of older adults. An English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink as supplemental.

To minimize the medical effort for the measurement of comorbidity, which is a relevant factor for various outcome measures, the Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire (SCQ) for patient self-evaluation has been developed. After successfully testing the psychometric characteristics and content of the original English version a validation of the German translation (SCQ-D) has so far been lacking. A total of 218 patients with gonarthrosis and coxarthrosis (average age 71.5 years) were included in the survey. A questionnaire for doctors as well as patients was used to collect data at five different measurement times (postoperative, beginning and end of rehabilitation as well as 4 months and 1 year postoperatively). To evaluate the matching of comorbidities according to the SCQ-D and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), aggregate indices for "problems" and "treatment" as well as correlation and kappa coefficients were calculated. The assessment of predictive validity in terms of treatment outcome was operationalized using the WOMAC and the postoperative 1 year hospitalization by applying multilevel models. The patient self-assessment using the SCQ-D correlated well with the physician assessment using CCI in terms of aggregate indices of 13 given disease groups with r = 0.49 (problems) and r = 0.48 (treatment). However, the results showed significant differences for certain diseases in the conclusions. The comorbidity measured by the SCQ-D proved to be a valid predictor of the hospitalization and the treatment outcome. Concerning the need for resource efficient data collection especially in large sample studies, the SCQ-D is a useful patient self-administered instrument to assess the type and extent of comorbidities.

Osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease in adults. With higher life expectancy and a growing proportion of elderly people in society, the relevance of osteoarthritis is becoming higher, especially in terms of socioeconomic effects and burdens for the healthcare system. In this review the pathogenesis and risk factors of the disease are presented with the focus on the knee, hip and shoulder, clinical symptoms, diagnosis and especially radiological imaging and therapy options.

Background: Neuropathic pain must be correctly diagnosed for optimal treatment. The questionnaire named Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) was developed in its original French version to evaluate the different symptoms of neuropathic pain. We hypothesized that the NPSI might also be used to differentiate neuropathic from non-neuropathic pain., Methods: We translated the NPSI into German using a standard forward-backward translation and administered it in a case-control design to patients with neuropathic (n = 68) and non-neuropathic pain (headache and osteoarthritis, n = 169) to validate it and to analyze its discriminant properties, its sensitivity to change, and to detect neuropathic pain subgroups with distinct profiles., Results: Using a sum score (the NPSI-G score), we found sensitivity to change (r between 0.37 and 0.5 for pain items of the graded chronic pain scale) and could distinguish between neuropathic and other pain on a group basis, but not for individual patients. Post hoc development of a discriminant score with optimized diagnostic properties to distinguish neuropathic pain from non-neuropathic pain resulted in an instrument with high sensitivity (91%) and acceptable specificity (70%). We detected six different pain profiles in the patient group with neuropathic pain; three profiles were found to be distinct., Conclusions: The NPSI-G potentially combines the properties of a diagnostic tool and an instrument to identify subtypes of neuropathic pain.

Objective: Pain represents one of the most important predictors of quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Prior studies were conducted in hospital settings and/or failed to control important factors such as depression, obesity, or physical activity. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine factors associated with pain intensity in a large sample of OA patients in primary care., Design: Cross-sectional survey with a questionnaire containing sociodemographic data, the short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS2-SF), and the Patient Health questionnaire, to assess concomitant depression. A hierarchical stepwise multiple regression analysis with the AIMS2-SF dimension "symptom" reflecting patients' pain intensity as the dependent variable was performed., Patients: 1,021 patients form 75 primary care practices., Results: In the regression model four factors remained, explaining 46.5% of the variation in the dependent variable (P < 0.001): Severity of depression reflected in the PHQ-9 score showed the strongest association with pain intensity (beta = 0.459, P < 0.001). Functional disability of the lower limb achieved a beta of 0.427 (P = 0.003). A low educational level was associated with increased pain scores (beta = -0.321; P = 0.034), as well as a weak social network, (beta = 0.211; P = 0.042)., Conclusions: A variety of physical and psychological factors were associated with pain intensity. Appropriate pain treatment of OA patients in primary care should consider as many of these factors as possible. Further research is needed to assess if a more comprehensive and proactive approach will result in less pain and in increased quality of life.

Background: In most countries, guidelines for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) are available. However, in Germany, no guideline for the primary care sector is available. The care provider of most patients is the general practitioner (GP). The aim of the study was to investigate the approaches in diagnosing and treating OA of German GPs and to assess adherence to international guidelines., Methods: Cross-sectional study using a structured questionnaire with a random sample of 144 GPs., Results: Regarding diagnosis, the importance of X-rays was overestimated. Regarding treatment approaches, exercising and weight reduction were regarded as primary treatment targets. Pharmacological treatment approaches were somewhat guideline oriented, but conservative approaches such as physical therapy were overestimated as invasive treatments such as intra-articular injections were underestimated in its benefit., Conclusion: Establishing a guideline specifically for primary care and increasing guideline adherence could help to prevent the present overuse of X-rays and the high amount of referrals to orthopaedics, save costs and reduce inadequate treatments.

Pain and loss of function are the clinical signs of osteoarthritis (OA). Conventional x-rays confirm the diagnosis or provide important hints for differential diagnosis. In the natural course of OA, x-rays are performed at longer intervals when pain increases or therapy is without effect, especially if more invasive therapies, or even surgery, becomes necessary. The advantages of x-rays are worldwide availability, cost effectiveness, very long experience with this imaging method and the possibility of storing the images for long periods of time. The typical findings of OA can be detected only roughly by quantitative methods. In many patients, grading of OA does not correlate well with the clinical symptoms. X-ray changes are part of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for OA of the hand, hip and knee. Ordinary s-rays can depicting bone with a higher local resolution than any other imaging technique. Soft tissues and cartilage can be visualized only indirectly. In OA, ultrasound is the method to depict intra-articular effusion at an early stage. Osteophytes or the degree of synovitis are also visible. Concomitant changes in tendons, bursae or cartilage, such as structures in the hip, shoulder and knee, can be evaluated. MRI is an appropriate tool for describing changes in cartilage volume and concomitant soft-tissue alterations. For qualitative cartilage imaging, MRI has, to date, not been fully validated. Bone scans (bone scintigraphy) allow the differentiation of inflammatory from degenerative joint affections and may add information on the activity of the subchondral bone, which may develop to a prognostic marker of OA. This survey represents recommendations of the Commission "Imaging Techniques" of the German Rheumatology Society regarding the technical and individual conditions, indications, practical guidance and the typical findings of imaging in OA.

Objective: Increasing bone mineral density (BMD) has been found in several studies in patients with osteoarthritis. Therefore, many clinicians deny the simultaneous occurrence of osteoporosis (OP) and osteoarthritis (OA). Because of our clinical impression however, we suggested that we have to consider a common occurrence. Furthermore, the value of markers of bone turn over with a view to early diagnosis of OP and or as an assessment for bone metabolism in OA is still a matter debate and their clinical use has not been clearly defined in the management of the individual patient., Method: The BMD of the lumbar spine and the proximal femur of 119 OA patients (83 postmenopausal female patients aged 50-83 and 35 male patients aged 36-86 years) who subsequently required hip or knee replacements, but were otherwise healthy, were measured by dual energy X-ray absorption (DXA), Hologic QDR-2000. We also measured biochemical markers of bone turn over, i. e., CICP, ICTP, DPD, PTH, estrogen, testosterone, bAP, hydroxy vitamin D and the normal blood count., Results: There was a high occurrence of a low BMD among the patients. A total of 28.9% of women were affected by OP and 52.9% by osteopoenie. This reflects the normal distribution of OP in the female population. Of the male patients 20% had OP and 38.8% osteopoenie. This is astonishing high. Age proved to be a significant factor in the degree of BMD. An association between disuse osteoporosis and degree of BMD in the OA affected joint could not be proven. The use of the biochemical markers for an earlier diagnosis or to assess bone metabolism in OP and OA was not possible., Conclusion: We can not support the hypotheses that OA prevents OP. Moreover, the occurrence of OP in our study reflected the incidence of OP in the average female and the astonishingly high incidence in the male population; however does not mean that the two conditions are mutually exclusive. We did not find that the biochemical markers of bone turn over could deliver additional information with respect to bone metabolism and an earlier diagnosis of OP.

Our objective was to compare the therapeutic approaches of German and Turkish physicians to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, by means of a mailed survey. The survey contained four case histories representing a mild, a moderate and a severe case of RA and a case of OA of the knee. One hundred and thirty-two physicians from Germany (internal medicine based (IR) and orthopaedics based (OR) rheumatologists) and thirty-three from Turkey (rheumatologists and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists (PT)) participated in the study. German respondents would give more disease-modifying drugs (DMARD) in early RA (48.7% vs 18.2%, p < 0.05), whereas their Turkish colleagues would prescribe more analgesics, ultrasound and kryotherapy in OA of the knee (63.6% vs 22.1%, 30.3% vs 6.5% and 24.2% vs 0.0% respectively p < 0.05). German physicians chose more exercise, physical and occupational therapy, radiation synovectomy and surgery in all cases. In OA of the knee German OR's would recommend less analgesics, but more local steroids, chondroprotective agents and surgery than the other groups. We may conclude that clinical practice of RA and OA of the knee differs considerably in Germany and Turkey. Cultural, social, educational and economic factors could influence the decisions of the physicians.

The WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Osteoarthritis Index is a tested questionnaire to assess symptoms and physical functional disability. We adapted the WOMAC for the German language and tested its metric properties, test-retest reliability and validity in 51 patients with knee and hip OA. All WOMAC scales (pain, stiffness, function) were internally consistent with Cronbach's coefficient alpha ranging from 0.80 to 0.96. Test-retest reliability was satisfactory with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.55 to 0.74. All scales and the global index calculated as the mean of scale scores had a bimodal distribution and a slight ceiling effect. As hypothesized the WOMAC scales were associated with radiological OA-severity and limitations of range-of-motion. Patients with more severe symptoms and functional disability perceived more limitations in their roles at home and at work. The presented German version of the WOMAC is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of symptoms and physical functional disability in patients with knee and hip OA.

The Lequesne algofunctional indices for the knee and the hip require a physician interview. We adapted the Lequesne indices for the German language and tested the metric properties, test-retest reliability and validity of a self-report questionnaire-format in 51 patients with hip or knee OA. The symptom and function components as well as the global indices had a high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient knee: 0.87/0.92 and 0.86, hip: 0.96/0.85 and 0.94). The symptom component showed an insufficient internal consistency (Cronbach's coefficient alpha knee: 0.55; hip: 0.63). Also, the symptom component was not or only weakly associated with radiological OA-severity and the limitations of range-of-motion. The most likely explanation is the grading of the Lequesne symptom questions which addresses such different concepts as pain presence, pain on movement, duration of pain and appearance of pain after a certain period of time. Because of the insufficient internal consistency and questionable validity the tested self-report German-version of the Lequesne algofunctional indices may not be recommended for use in clinical research and practice.