Search

Group therapy was shown to be an effective and economic intervention. To date few instruments exist to empirically assess mechanisms of therapeutic change in group therapy. The Group Therapy Process Questionnaire for Therapists (FEPiG-T) measuring change mechanisms in group therapy as viewed from the perspectives of therapists was developed and validated in this study based on the conceptualizations of Grawe,Yalom and Bordin and in reference to the previously developed measure for patients. The FEPiG-T subscales show good internal consistencies and small to large correlations with convergent measures. Subscales at beginning of therapy correlated with improvement of interpersonal problems over time. Further associations with symptom scales remained more vague. However, intersections with the established version for patients allow routinely implemented evaluation of the 2 perspectives in clinical practice, but inevitably need careful interpretation where the instruments differ in their factor structure., Competing Interests: Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

In analogy to somatic medicine, modern psychiatry strives to measure the outcome of treatment and care. In order to warrant an effective therapy, this request is reasonable from the standpoint of both the therapist and the patient as well as hospitals or insurance companies. However, how can I measure friendliness, empathy or humanity, the "being available for somebody"? For sure, psychiatric DRGs, which connote efficacy based on periods of time, are by no means suitable. The present study analyses routine clinical data of an ergotherapeutic questionnaire, as an aid to estimating treatment quality. The naturalistic character of this data collection during daily routine may be an advantage to assessing the quality of results in psychiatry.