Search

Background & Aims: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is standard therapy for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm. It has been suggested recently that polyp resection without current (cold resection) may be superior to the standard technique using cutting/coagulation current (hot resection) by reducing adverse events (AEs), but evidence from a randomized trial is missing., Methods: In this randomized controlled multicentric trial involving 19 centers, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm were randomly assigned to cold or hot EMR. The primary outcome was major AE (eg, perforation or postendoscopic bleeding). Among secondary outcomes, major AE subcategories, postpolypectomy syndrome, and residual adenoma were most relevant., Results: Between 2021 and 2023, there were 396 polyps in 363 patients (48.2% were female) enrolled for the intention-to-treat analysis. Major AEs occurred in 1.0% of the cold group and in 7.9% of the hot group (P = .001; odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.54). Rates for perforation and postendoscopic bleeding were significantly lower in the cold group, with 0% vs 3.9% (P = .007) and 1.0% vs 4.4% (P = .040). Postpolypectomy syndrome occurred with similar frequency (3.1% vs 4.4%; P = .490). After cold resection, residual adenoma was found more frequently, with 23.7% vs 13.8% (P = .020; OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.12-3.38). In multivariable analysis, lesion diameter of ≥4 cm was an independent predictor both for major AEs (OR, 3.37) and residual adenoma (OR, 2.47) and high-grade dysplasia/cancer for residual adenoma (OR, 2.92)., Conclusions: Cold resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps appears to be considerably safer than hot EMR; however, at the cost of a higher residual adenoma rate. Further studies have to confirm to what extent polyp size and histology can determine an individualized approach. German Clinical Trials Registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien), Number DRKS00025170., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In summer 2011, Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli (EHEC) serotype O104:H4 caused the most severe EHEC outbreak in Germany to date. The case of a previously recovered patient with symptomatic postinflammatory colonic stenosis following EHEC- infection prompted us to conduct a prospective study to assess the macro- and microscopic intestinal long-term damage in a cohort of patients who had suffered from severe EHEC colitis., Methods: Following EHEC infection in 2011, 182 patients were offered to participate in this study between January 2013 and October 2014 as part of the post-inpatient follow-up care at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and to undergo colonoscopy with stepwise biopsies. Prior to colonoscopy, medical history and persistent post-infectious complaints were assessed., Results: Out of 182 patients, 22 (12%) participated in the study, 18 (82%) were female. All patients had been hospitalized due severe EHEC enterocolitis: 20 patients (90%) had subsequently developed hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), 16 patients (72%) had additionally required dialysis. On assessment prior to colonoscopy, all patients denied any abdominal complaints before EHEC-infection but 8 (36%) patients reported persistent post-infectious symptoms. According to the ROME IV criteria, 4 (18%) patients met the definition for post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS). In all patients with persistent symptoms, colonoscopies and histological examination were unremarkable. Only in one symptom-free patient, biopsy revealed a locally limited cryptitis of the caecum, while all patients without complaints had inconspicuous histological and endoscopical findings., Conclusion: Following infection colonic stenosis is a serious but rare long-term complication in patients who had suffered from severe enterocolitis. However, a significant proportion of these patients develop PI-IBS., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Biliary strictures are common complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography evolved as standard and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage as alternative therapy. This study analysed predictors of long-term success of biliary strictures after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and/or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage and its impact on patient survival., Methods: All adult patients with biliary strictures receiving endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and/or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage between 2009 and 2015 at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf were retrospectively analysed. Potential predictors of long-term success (≥12 months) were identified by univariate and logistic regression analyses. Patient survival was analysed by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test., Results: Hundred and sixteen patients were treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and/or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage, including 67 patients with anastomotic strictures, 22 with nonanastomotic strictures and 27 with both stricture types. Eighty-five patients received endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, 17 percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage and 14 both techniques. Long-term success was achieved in 60 patients (52%). Predictors of treatment failure were a preinterventional C-reactive protein >8 g/dL in anastomotic strictures (P = 0.039) and a body mass index ≤21 kg/m 2 in nonanastomotic strictures (P = 0.021). In patients who received endoscopic retrograde cholangiography only, balloon dilatation of anastomotic strictures with larger diameters favoured success (P = 0.015). Achievement of long-term success was associated with prolonged patient survival in anastomotic strictures (P = 0.036) and nonanastomotic strictures (P = 0.025), but not in combined strictures (P = 0.739)., Conclusion: In post-orthotopic liver transplantation biliary strictures treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and/or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage, patient BMI and preinterventional C-reactive protein may influence prognosis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with larger balloon diameter may favour success in anastomotic strictures. Long-term success by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and/or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage is associated with superior survival in patients with anastomotic strictures and nonanastomotic strictures only., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The innovative vascular unloading technology (VUT) allows continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure (AP) monitoring. We aimed to investigate whether the VUT enables AP changes to be detected earlier compared with intermittent AP monitoring in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. In this prospective observational study, we recorded continuous AP measurements with the VUT (CNAP system; CNSystems Medizintechnik AG, Graz, Austria) and intermittent AP measurements with upper arm cuff oscillometry in 90 patients undergoing complex gastrointestinal endoscopy (Department of Interventional Endoscopy at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). A "hypotensive phase" was defined as a time period of at least 30 s during which ≥ 50% of the VUT-AP values were in a predefined range of hypotension, i.e., AP value a) ≥ 10% below the last oscillometric value and b) ≤ 65 mmHg for mean AP or ≤ 90 mmHg for systolic AP. In the 5-min-interval between two oscillometric measurements, one or more hypotensive phases were detected in 26 patients (29%) for mean AP and in 27 patients (30%) for systolic AP. Hypotensive phases had a mean duration of 195 ± 99 s for mean AP and 197 ± 97 s for systolic AP with a mean procedure duration of 36 (± 21) min. Continuous noninvasive AP monitoring using the VUT enables hypotensive phases to be detected earlier compared with intermittent AP monitoring during complex gastrointestinal endoscopy. These hypotensive phases may be missed or only belatedly recognized with intermittent AP monitoring. Continuous noninvasive AP measurement facilitates detecting hemodynamic instability more rapidly and therefore may improve patient safety.

Background & Aims: A higher incidence of proximal interval cancers after colonoscopy has been reported in several follow-up studies. One possible explanation for this might be that proximally located adenomas have greater malignant potential. The aim of the present study was to assess the risk of malignancy in proximal versus distal adenomas in patients included in a large screening colonoscopy database; adenoma shape and the patients' age and sex distribution were also analyzed., Methods: Data for 2007-2012 from the German National Screening Colonoscopy Registry, including 594,614 adenomas identified during 2,532,298 screening colonoscopies, were analyzed retrospectively. The main outcome measure was the rate of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in adenomas, used as a surrogate marker for the risk of malignancy. Odds ratios (ORs) for the rate of HGD found in adenomas were analyzed in relation to patient- and adenoma-related factors using multivariate analysis., Results: HGD histology was noted in 20,873 adenomas (3.5%). Proximal adenoma locations were not associated with a higher HGD rate. The most significant risk factor for HGD was adenoma size (OR 10.36 ≥1 cm vs <1 cm), followed by patient age (OR 1.26 and 1.46 for age groups 65-74 and 75-84 vs 55-64 years) and sex (OR 1.15 male vs female). In comparison with flat adenomas as a reference lesion, sessile lesions had a similar HGD rate (OR 1.02) and pedunculated adenomas had a higher rate (OR 1.23). All associations were statistically significant (P ≤ .05)., Conclusions: In this large screening database, it was found that the rates of adenomas with HGD are similar in the proximal and distal colon. The presence of HGD as a risk marker alone does not explain higher rates of proximal interval colorectal cancer. We suggest that certain lesions (flat, serrated lesions) may be missed in the proximal colon and may acquire a more aggressive biology over time. A combination of endoscopy-related factors and biology may therefore account for higher rates of proximal versus distal interval colorectal cancer., (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality indicator of screening colonoscopy; it is inversely associated with risk of interval cancers and colorectal cancer mortality. We assessed trends in the ADR in the first 10 years of the German screening colonoscopy program., Methods: We calculated age-adjusted and age-specific detection rates of nonadvanced adenomas and advanced adenomas for each calendar year based on 4.4 million screening colonoscopies conducted from 2003 through 2012 and reported to the German screening colonoscopy registry., Results: We observed a steady and strong increase in rate of detection of nonadvanced adenomas in both sexes and all age groups. Age-adjusted rates of detection of nonadvanced adenomas increased from 13.3% to 22.3% among men and from 8.4% to 14.9% among women. This increase was mostly due to an increase in detection rates of adenomas <0.5 cm, and it is partly explained by an innovation effect (higher ADRs among incoming colonoscopists than among leaving colonoscopists, and relatively stable ADRs among continuing colonoscopists). Only modest increases were observed in detection rates of advanced adenomas (from 7.4% to 9.0% among men, and from 4.4% to 5.2% among women) and colorectal cancer. In 2012, overall ADR reached 31.3% and 20.1% in men and women, respectively., Conclusions: We observed a strong increase in ADRs from 2003 through 2012 in Germany. Although we cannot exclude the effects of secular trends in colorectal neoplasm prevalence, the observed increase was mainly the result of a steady increase in detection of nonadvanced adenomas (especially adenomas <0.5 cm). Further research should address potential implications for defining screening and surveillance intervals., (Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Students of veterinary medicine should achieve basic professional competences required to practise their profession. A main focus of veterinary education is on developing clinical skills. The present study used the guidelines of the "Day-One Skills" list of European Association of Establishments for Veterinary Education (EAEVE) to create an online questionnaire for assessing the skills acquired by students at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover (TiHo). The theoretical and practical veterinary knowledge levels of the students and postgraduates are determined and compared., Results: In two batches, 607 people responded (response batch 1, 23.78%; response batch 2, 23.83%). From 49 defined skills, 28 are actually practised during training at the university and 21 activities are known only theoretically. Furthermore, the students showed great willingness to use simulators and models in a clinical skills lab., Conclusions: The results of this survey highlight that the opening of a clinical skills lab at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover and its incorporation into the study programme are ideal tools to promote practical competences and foster the motivation to learn.

Background: Current endoscopic therapy for neoplastic Barrett's oesophagus (BO) consists of complete resection/ablation of all Barrett's tissue including neoplastic lesions. Recurrence seems to be frequent after thermal therapy, such as radiofrequency ablation., Objective: To analyse long-term recurrence of neoplasia and BO after successful widespread endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)., Design: In a retrospective analysis, all patients undergoing widespread EMR of neoplastic BO between 2002 and 2007 at two referral centres were followed for at least 3 years after completion of endotherapy. Recurrence was diagnosed if neoplasia and/or BO were detected following previous successful complete removal, defined as at least two negative endoscopies and biopsies., Results: Ninety patients undergoing widespread EMR were included (mean age 63 years; 82 male), 58% of whom underwent additional thermal ablation for minor residual disease. Complete eradication of neoplasia and Barrett's tissue was achieved in 90% of patients. On further follow-up (mean 64.8 months), recurrence of neoplastic and non-neoplastic BO was found in 6.2% and 39.5%, respectively. Recurring neoplasia (3 adenocarcinomas, 1 low-grade and 1 high-grade dysplasia) were found after a median of 44 months (range 38-85) and could be retreated endoscopically. In a multivariate analysis, Barrett's length was the only factor significantly associated with recurrence (OR 2.73)., Conclusions: Even after seemingly complete endoscopic resection, recurrence of BO is frequent and independent of additional thermal therapy. Due to the possibility of neoplasia recurrence even after long disease-free intervals, follow-up should be extended beyond 5 years., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Background: As screening methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) are limited by uptake and adherence, further options are sought. A blood test might increase both, but none has yet been tested in a screening setting., Objective: We prospectively assessed the accuracy of circulating methylated SEPT9 DNA (mSEPT9) for detecting CRC in a screening population., Design: Asymptomatic individuals ≥50 years old scheduled for screening colonoscopy at 32 US and German clinics voluntarily gave blood plasma samples before colon preparation. Using a commercially available assay, three independent blinded laboratories assayed plasma DNA of all CRC cases and a stratified random sample of other subjects in duplicate real time PCRs. The primary outcomes measures were standardised for overall sensitivity and specificity estimates., Results: 7941 men (45%) and women (55%), mean age 60 years, enrolled. Results from 53 CRC cases and from 1457 subjects without CRC yielded a standardised sensitivity of 48.2% (95% CI 32.4% to 63.6%; crude rate 50.9%); for CRC stages I-IV, values were 35.0%, 63.0%, 46.0% and 77.4%, respectively. Specificity was 91.5% (95% CI 89.7% to 93.1%; crude rate 91.4%). Sensitivity for advanced adenomas was low (11.2%)., Conclusions: Our study using the blood based mSEPT9 test showed that CRC signal in blood can be detected in asymptomatic average risk individuals undergoing screening. However, the utility of the test for population screening for CRC will require improved sensitivity for detection of early cancers and advanced adenomas., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT00855348.

Background and Study Aims: The German screening colonoscopy program is accompanied by a central registry that records the main outcome quality indicators, namely colonoscopy completion rate, adenoma detection rate (ADR), and complication rate. The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of these registry data by comparing them with data from a prospective quality assurance study based on a self-reporting audit and patient feedback of screening colonoscopy., Patients and Methods: The completeness of registry information was analyzed by comparing it with prospective data gathered by audit and patient feedback in a previous quality assurance study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00860665) between October 2006 and March 2008. The main outcome parameters were colonoscopy completion rate, ADR, and complication rate. Complications were recorded in three steps in the audit study using case report forms (immediate and subsequent documentation by physicians [CRF-1 and CRF-2], and patient follow-up [CRF-3]), but were documented in the registry without differentiation., Results: A total of 12 134 individuals (mean age 64.5 years; 47 % men) who underwent screening colonoscopy at 19 private practices in Berlin over the 18-month period were included in the audit study. Patient feedback was obtained for 90.1 %. A total of 12 150 cases had been recorded in the registry by the same private practices during the same period. Colonoscopy completion rate and ADR data were comparable in the audit study and registry (completion rate 98.2 % vs. 97.7 %; ADR 21.0 % vs. 20.5 %). However, compared with the registry data, the complication rate was 3.1-fold higher in the audit (0.46 % vs. 0.15 %; P < 0.001), and double (0.33 % vs. 0.15 %; P < 0.05) when patient feedback was not included., Conclusions: Of the screening colonoscopy quality parameters, colonoscopy completion rate and ADR, but not complication rates, were reliably documented in the German national screening colonoscopy registry. Data on complications need to be appropriately standardized and audited in order to be used for credentialing and benchmarking purposes., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

The past few years have seen a shift in focus for endoscopy research. For example, there has been a halt in the apparent revolution of natural orifice transluminal surgery (NOTES), which was long considered the most important innovation in flexible endoscopy. Other trends such as endoscopic histology are slowing down and not progressing into clinical practice. In general, the quality of endoscopic research needs to be improved, particularly in the field of diagnostics and imaging 1. Nevertheless, progress in some areas continues, albeit at a slower pace than we might like. In this review the areas of current interest are reviewed with reference to the most relevant areas of progress in recent years., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Screening colonoscopy effectiveness is hampered by limited adherence by the general population. The present prospective study was performed to evaluate whether adding capsule colonoscopy to the endoscopic screening options increases uptake., Methods: Invitation letters were sent to 2150 persons above the age of 55 insured with a German medical insurance company in the area of Rinteln, Lower Saxony with a baseline spontaneous annual screening colonoscopy uptake of 1 %. Both capsule or conventional colonoscopy were offered. Interested persons were given information about the two screening options by four local gastroenterologists and examinations were then performed according to screenees' final choice., Results: 154 persons sought further information, and 34 and 90 underwent conventional and capsule colonoscopy, respectively. Colonoscopy uptake was thus increased by the invitation process by 60 % (1.6 % vs. 1 %; p = 0.075), while the option of capsule endoscopy led to a fourfold increase of screening uptake (4.2 % vs. 1 %, p < 0.001). Despite similar age distribution in both sex groups, uptake in men was significantly higher (5.6 % vs. 2.8 %, p = 002). However, overall adenoma yield was not different in both groups., Conclusions: The present study suggests that offering the option of capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening. However, capsule endoscopy sensitivity for adenoma detection needs to be improved.

Endoscopic surveillance is recommended for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). Based on a large database, gathered from predominantly community-based practices in Germany, we aimed to investigate the time-course of malignant progression and apply these findings to current clinical practice. Data of 1438 patients with BE from a large German BE database were analyzed. Patients with at least one follow-up endoscopy/biopsy were included. Detection of 'malignant Barrett' (either high-grade intra-epithelial neoplasia or invasive adenocarcinoma) was considered as study end-point. Of 1438 patients with BE, 57 patients had low-grade intra-epithelial neoplasia (LG-IN) on initial biopsy and 1381 exhibited non-neoplastic BE. 'Malignant Barrett' was detected in 28 cases (1.9%) during a median follow-up period of 24 months (1-255), accounting for an incidence of 0.95% per patient year of follow-up. The frequency of 'malignant Barrett' was significantly higher (P < 0.001, chi(2)-test) in the LG-IN group (n = 11, 19.3%) compared with the non-neoplastic BE group (n = 17, 1.2%). In the non-neoplastic BE group, 'malignant Barrett' was predominantly found during re-endoscopy within the first year of follow-up (12 of 17; 70.6%), in contrast to the LG-IN group, in which 'malignant Barrett' was observed predominantly after a time exceeding 12 months (8 of 11, 72.7%; P = 0.05, Fisher's exact test). Initial endoscopic evaluations seem to play the most crucial role in managing BE. After 1 year of follow-up, endoscopic surveillance should be focused on patients with LG-IN. In patients with repeatedly proven non-neoplastic BE, elongation of the follow-up intervals to the upper limit of current guidelines, that is, 5 years, might be justified.

Purpose: The introduction of reimbursement for screening colonoscopy in Germany more than one year ago raised concerns that the consequent workload might lead to underuse of diagnostic colonoscopy for symptomatic patients. Available appropriateness criteria for diagnostic colonoscopy have been rarely tested in a realistic outpatient setting. This study was designed to test current appropriateness criteria for diagnostic colonoscopy to better select patients and potentially provide more capacity for screening cases. Secondary goals were yield and quality control in both the diagnostic and screening cases., Methods: A prospective study was initiated in 39 private-practice offices to collect data on consecutive colonoscopies conducted during a 6-day study period. A detailed questionnaire was developed to define indications and symptoms, and all findings at colonoscopy were recorded. Colonoscopies were further analyzed and stratified into a screening and a diagnostic group. In the diagnostic group, indications were assessed according to the current guidelines for appropriateness (American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Panel for the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), and the results were correlated with the percentage of relevant findings (tumors, inflammatory conditions)., Results: During the study period, 1,397 colonoscopies (57 percent screening, 43 percent diagnostic) were analyzed (male/female ratio = 39/61 percent; mean age, 61 years). Fourteen percent and 37 percent, respectively, of the 605 diagnostic colonoscopies were regarded as inappropriate relative to the criteria of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the European Panel for the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. However, the percentage of relevant inflammatory and neoplastic findings (polyps, cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, benign strictures) was only 5 to 10 percent higher in the appropriate group than in the inappropriate group. On the basis of these data, a hypothetical model for selecting appropriate indications was developed: if patients older than aged 50 years with pain, bleeding, and diarrhea, but not constipation, are regarded as having an appropriate indication, such an approach would save 20 percent of colonoscopies in these main indication groups (bleeding, pain, diarrhea, constipation), with a hypothetical miss rate for relevant findings (as defined above) of 5 percent., Conclusions: Currently used appropriateness criteria for diagnostic colonoscopy increase the yield of relevant findings but lead to a miss rate for relevant findings in the range of 10 to 15 percent. Simple selection criteria based on age and symptoms could be more suitable and should be tested in a larger group of patients.

Background: Despite its high prevalence, data on the course of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are still sparse. There is also an ongoing debate on the natural history of its various manifestations, i.e., non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) vs. erosive reflux disease (ERD) vs. Barrett's esophagus (BE)., Patients and Methods: This study was conducted within the framework of a prospective multicenter study on the course and prevalence of intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction. 1014 dyspeptic patients were screened by the means of upper GI endoscopy. Clinical data were recorded by the use of a questionnaire. At least 15 months after the initial examination, all patients were invited for follow-up (FU) examination. Patients were analyzed separately with respect to their clinical and endoscopic findings. For the latter, only patients without any treatment with proton-pump-inhibitors (PPI) prior to initial and follow-up examinations were included. Patients were categorized as GERD positive if typical symptoms were present and/or proton pump inhibitors were used., Results: Sufficient clinical and/or endoscopic data were available in 590 GERD patients with heartburn at least once a week. Follow-up data could be obtained in 320 patients (clinical FU: n = 304; endoscopic FU: n = 52) after a mean follow-up period of 35 months (18-48 months). 96 of 144 previously asymptomatic patients (67%) remained asymptomatic at follow-up, the rest (n = 48) were symptomatic. 143 of 304 previously symptomatic patients (47%) were symptom-free at follow-up, and only 161 patients (53%) remained symptomatic or had concomitant therapy with proton-pump-inhibitors (PPI). For follow-up endoscopy in patients off PPI (n = 52), ERD was no longer confirmed in 7/12 ERD patients (58%), whereas progress to ERD was found in 3/34 patients (9%) in the NERD group. BE was newly diagnosed in two NERD patients but could no longer be detected in 2 of 6 patients with an initial diagnosis of BE., Conclusions: With respect to its clinical as well as its endoscopic manifestations, gastroesophageal reflux disease does not appear to be very stable over time. However, in most cases this is due to regression rather than progression of the disease.

Background: In most European countries, training in GI endoscopy has largely been based on hands-on acquisition of experience in patients rather than on a structured training programme. With the development of training models systematic hands-on training in a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy techniques was achieved. Little, however, is known about methods of objectively assessing trainees' performance. We therefore developed an assessment 'score card' for upper GI endoscopy and tested it in endoscopists with various levels of experience. The aim of the study was therefore to assess interobserver variations in the evaluation of trainees., Methods: On the basis of textbook and expert opinions a consensus group of eight experienced endoscopists developed a score card for diagnostic upper GI endoscopy with biopsy. The score card includes an assessment of the single steps of the procedure as well as of the times needed to complete each step. This score card was then evaluated in a further conference including ten experts who blindly assessed videotapes of 15 endoscopists performing upper GI endoscopy in a training bio-simulation model (the 'Erlangen Endo-Trainer'). On the basis of their previous experience (i. e. the number of endoscopies performed) these 15 endoscopists were classified into four groups: very experienced, experienced, having some experience and inexperienced. Interobserver variability (IOV) was tested for the various score card parameters (Kendall's rank-correlation coefficient 0.0-0.5 poor, 0.5-1.0 good agreement). In addition, the correlation between the score card assessment and the examiners' experience levels was analysed., Results: Despite poor IOV results for all the parameters tested (Kendall coefficient < 0.3), the assessment parameters correlated well when the examiners' different experience levels were taken into account (correlation coefficient 0.59-0.89, p < 0.05). The score card parameters were suitable for differentiating between the four groups of examiners with different levels of endoscopic experience., Conclusions: As expected with scores involving subjective assessment of performance, the variability between reviewers was substantial. Nevertheless, the assessment score was capable of distinguishing reliably between different experience levels in terms of a good individual observer consistency. The score card can therefore be used to document both training status and progress during endoscopy training courses using bio-simulation models, and this might be able to provide improved quality assurance in GI endoscopy training.

Background: The German version of the Minimal Standard Terminology document for endoscopy was discussed in 1997 and 1998, and finally published at the end of 1999 as one of the German Gastroenterology Society guidelines. The diagnoses and descriptive terms included in this standard terminology are based on the consensus views of a large number of German endoscopists (20 endoscopists based in Munich and 20 elsewhere in Germany). The aim of the present study was to investigate how much spontaneous compliance there is with the descriptive terms included in the standard terminology - both among the members of the consensus discussions, and among colleagues not involved in this project., Methods: A total of 881 endoscopy reports with the diagnoses of reflux, ulcer, and gastritis were collected from 11 centers (2 hospitals and 9 private offices, with a total of 26 examiners) over a one-month period. Nine of the 26 examiners were actively involved in the terminology consensus discussion. The rate of occurrence of the descriptive terms contained in the standard terminology was assessed for the diagnoses listed above., Results: Compliance with the descriptive terms was high (> 90 %) only for basic parameters such as the Savary classification of reflux and the area in which gastroduodenal ulcers were located. Other important parameters, such as the extent (length) of Barrett's esophagus, ulcer size, and circumferential location, were reported in only three-quarters of cases or less. The descriptions of gastritis were inconsistent. There was no difference in the degree of compliance either between endoscopists using free dictation and those using computerized text blocks, or between members of the terminology group and those not involved in preparing the terminology., Conclusions: Adherence to standard terminology and its descriptive parameters is poor even among specialized gastroenterologists who have been involved in terminology consensus discussions. Compliance needs to be improved by providing suitable software programs with automatic reporting functions.

Background and Study Aims: Attempts to standardize Helicobacter pylori (Hp) diagnosis and therapy have led to the publication of guidelines by various national gastroenterological societies in Europe and the USA. However, little information is available either regarding the compliance of gastroenterologists and referring physicians with these guidelines, or regarding the patients' perspective., Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of all outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy reports for a one-month period in eleven different centers (two university hospitals and nine private practice gastroenterology offices) with a total of 24 gastroenterologists. Endoscopy reports from patients wit the indications of reflux, diarrhea, and tumors were excluded. Diagnoses and treatment recommendations given by gastroenterologists were recorded. Questionnaires concerning Hp diagnosis, treatment indications and performance, and follow-up were sent to referring physicians and patients., Results: A total of 772 endoscopy reports were included in the study; analyzable questionnaires were returned by 287 referring physicians (47%) and by 265 patients (59%). Gastroenterologists recommended Hp eradication in all ulcers and in 29% of gastritis/nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) cases. Referring physicians thought that 94% of ulcers should be treated by Hp eradication, which was also considered to be an absolute and relative indication in NUD by 15% and 53% of the referring physicians, respectively. Among the patients who replied, 52% had received Hp eradication regimens; ulcers were found in 22% of the total patient group. Check-up examinations after Hp therapy were considered necessary by 75% of the referring physicians, but only 22% of the responding patients actually underwent some form of check-up (upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in 91%)., Conclusions: Gastroenterologists and (to a somewhat lesser extent) referring physician appear to be following the current guidelines for Hp treatment. As expected, two thirds of referring physicians consider NUD to be absolute or relative indication for Hp eradication. Check-up examinations are apparently being performed less frequently than recommended.