Search

Simple Summary: Knowledge on the real-world outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma and the value of different endpoints for evaluating survival benefits is limited. We investigated the outcomes and different surrogate endpoints for overall survival (OS) in 664 pembrolizumab-treated patients with advanced melanoma in Germany. Our findings support the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in real-world clinical practice. The real-world time to next treatment was most strongly correlated with OS, suggesting it as a valuable surrogate endpoint to assess treatment effectiveness. Real-world studies assessing time to next treatment could support clinical and payer decision making. Knowledge on the real-world characteristics and outcomes of pembrolizumab-treated advanced melanoma patients in Germany and on the value of different real-world endpoints as surrogates for overall survival (OS) is limited. A sample of 664 pembrolizumab-treated patients with advanced melanoma from the German registry ADOReg was used. We examined OS, real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), real-world time to next treatment (rwTtNT), and real-world time on treatment (rwToT). Spearman's rank and iterative multiple imputation (IMI)-based correlation coefficients were computed between the OS and the rwPFS, rwTtNT, and rwToT and reported for the first line of therapy and the overall sample. The median OS was 30.5 (95%CI 25.0–35.4) months, the rwPFS was 3.9 months (95%CI 3.5–4.9), the rwTtNT was 10.7 months (95%CI 9.0–12.9), and the rwToT was 6.2 months (95%CI 5.1–6.8). The rwTtNT showed the highest correlation with the OS based on the IMI (rIMI = 0.83), Spearman rank correlations (rs = 0.74), followed by the rwToT (rIMI = 0.74 and rs = 0.65) and rwPFS (rIMI = 0.69 and rs = 0.56). The estimates for the outcomes and correlations were similar for the overall sample and those in first-line therapy. The median OS was higher compared to recent real-world studies, supporting the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in regular clinical practice. The rwTtNT may be a valuable OS surrogate, considering the highest correlation was observed with the OS among the investigated real-world endpoints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive malignancy with a dismal prognosis. Among curative treatment options for CCA, radical surgical resection with extrahepatic bile duct resection, hepatectomy and en-bloc lymphadenectomy are considered the mainstay of curative therapy. Here, we aimed to identify prognostic markers of clinical outcome in CCA-patients who underwent surgical resection in curative intent., Material and Methods: Between 2011 and 2016, 162 patients with CCA (perihilar CCA (pCCA): n = 91, intrahepatic CCA (iCCA): n = 71) underwent surgery in curative intent at our institution. Preoperative characteristics, perioperative data and oncological follow-up were obtained from a prospectively managed institutional database. The associations of overall- (OS) and disease-free-survival (DFS) with clinico-pathological characteristics were assessed using univariate and multivariable cox regression analyses., Results: The median OS and DFS were 38 and 36 months for pCCA and 25 and 13 months for iCCA, respectively. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and lymph node metastasis as well as surgical complications as assessed by the comprehensive complication index (CCI) and tumor grading were independently associated with OS for the pCCA (LVI; RR = 2.36, p = 0.028; CCI; RR = 1.04, p < 0.001) and iCCA cohorts (N-category; RR = 3.21, p = 0.040; tumor grading; RR = 3.75, p = 0.013; CCI, RR = 4.49, p = 0.010), respectively. No other clinical variable including R0-status and Bismuth classification was associated with OS., Conclusion: Major liver resections for CCA are feasible and safe in experienced high-volume centers. Lymph node metastasis and LVI are associated with adverse clinical outcome, supporting the role of systematic lymphadenectomy. The assessment of LVI may be useful in identifying high-risk patients for adjuvant treatment strategies., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)