Search

The widespread High Arctic Large Igneous Province (HALIP) exhibits prolonged melting over more than 50 Myr, an observation that is difficult to reconcile with the classic view that large igneous provinces (LIPs) originate from melting in plume heads. Hence, the suggested plume‐related origin and classification of HALIP as a LIP have been questioned. Here, we use numerical models that include melting and melt migration to investigate a rising plume interacting with lithosphere of variable thickness, that is, a basin‐to‐craton setting applicable to the Arctic. Models reveal that melt migration introduces significant spatial and temporal variations in melt volumes and pulses of melt production, including protracted melting for at least about 30–40 Myr, because of the dynamic feedback between migrating melt and local lithosphere thinning. For HALIP, plume material deflected from underneath the Greenland craton can re‐activate melting zones below the previously plume‐influenced Sverdrup Basin after a melt‐free period of about 10–15 Myr, even though the plume is already ∼500 km away. Hence, actively melting zones do not necessarily represent the location of the deeper plume stem at a given time, especially for secondary pulses. Additional processes such as (minor) plume flux variations or local lithospheric extension may alter the timing and volume of HALIP pulses, but are to first order not required to reproduce the long‐lived and multi‐pulse magmatism of HALIP. Since melting zones are always plume‐fed, we would expect HALIP magmatism to exhibit plume‐related trace element signatures throughout time, potentially shifting from mostly tholeiitic toward more alkalic compositions. Plain Language Summary: Typically, the arrival of a large mantle upwelling ("mantle plume") is expected to cause catastrophic large‐scale volcanism that lasts a few million years. However, a massive past volcanic event now distributed onshore and offshore across the Arctic (the High Arctic Large Igneous Province—HALIP) defies this definition. This wide‐spread magmatism exhibits dates spanning more than 50 Myr, with several pulses of activity. Based on this prolonged magmatism, it has been questioned whether all of it can be attributed to a mantle plume, despite the geochemistry of basalts indicating a plume source. Here, we show that a plume can cause prolonged and multi‐pulse magmatism if it interacts with an increase in lithosphere thickness. Once the plume moves below the thicker lithosphere, hot plume material is channeled along the base of the lithosphere toward the adjacent thinner part, where it can reactivate previous melting regions. At this time, the active plume can be about 500 km away from the melting region, hence plume‐related melt cannot be used as a proxy for the plume position at the given time. Based on the models, we suggest that the prolonged HALIP magmatism was caused by a plume interacting with the edge of a craton. Key Points: Mantle plumes interacting with changes in lithosphere thickness at craton edges can cause prolonged melting with pulses in the same regionRejuvenated melting happens underneath previously melt‐affected thinned lithosphere several hundred km downstream of the plume stemThe timing and duration of rejuvenated melting in models correspond to and therefore may explain observations of magmatic pulses from High Arctic Large Igneous Province [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]