Search

The paper discusses the magnetotelluric derived electrical resistivity cross‐section of deep crust along the Lohit Valley in the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxial bend region. A low‐angle, north‐east dipping, intra‐crustal low resistive layer (IC‐LRL) is a dominant feature in the resistivity cross‐section. We interpret IC‐LRL as a signature of Main Himalayan Thrust. In the geoelectrical model, all the major thrusts separating different tectonic zones across the profile coincide with the dipping conducting features and these thrusts merged to IC‐LRL. The Lesser Himalaya and the Lohit Plutonic Complex are imaged as resistive features. Conductive zone between the Lesser Himalaya and Lohit Plutonic Complex reflect the Tidding Suture Zone. Conductivity of the IC‐LRL is lower in comparison with IC‐LRL imaged in another sector of the Himalaya. We suggest this difference is due to the significant difference in the intensity of the tectonic processes in this part of the Himalaya as compared to elsewhere. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study area represents one of the active segments of the frontal part of the Arunachal Himalaya. The major structural boundaries traversing the area are the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) and the Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFT) and other local faults are tectonically active, as evident from the landforms that evolved in the fault zones. Strath terraces and uplift fluvial terraces are observed in the hanging‐wall block of the HFT and MBT, and along the HFT straight to curvilinear mountain fronts are observed. Normal faults both transverse and parallel to the strike of HFT are observed in the hanging‐wall block of the HFT. West of Pasighat the sub‐Himalaya terrain resembles a duplex, where there is gradual rise in elevation from the Brahmaputra Plain to the low‐lying hills of the sub‐Himalayan and sudden rise in elevation across the MBT. Drainage aligning to the bedrock structures and stream migrations are observed in the fault zones. Along the MBT, the sub‐Himalayan rocks are thrusted over either by quartzite or black carbonaceous shales, in some sections the MBT is behaving as a back‐thrust that dips towards the south. The MBT has also been displaced by almost N–S‐trending transverse faults where highly sheared bedrocks are also observed. Tilting of Quaternary fluvial deposits are observed in the hanging‐wall blocks of intraformational thrusts at two locations. Signatures of paleoseismic activities in the form of various soft‐sediment deformational structures are observed in Quaternary deposits in the HFT zone and also in the hanging‐wall block of the MBT. To determine the deformation and strain rate accumulation, we have re‐analysed the available GNSS results of the area, which indicate a deformation rate of up to 16 mm/year in the vicinity of the Pasighat region. The GPS‐derived deformation rates are well corroborated with the existing results of peak ground acceleration (PGA) anomalies. The component–wise motion indicates higher fault perpendicular motion in this part, which reveals an accumulation of more strain along the major Himalayan faults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Landforms developed along the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) and Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFT) zones in Ramnagar area of Kumaun sub‐Himalaya are studied. The geomorphic analyses suggest their spatial and temporal relationship with the reactivation of the boundary thrusts, faults, and associated later developed transverse faults. Mapping of geomorphic features and structural analysis of the MBT and HFT established an intimate relationship between thrusting of rocks along these major thrusts and evolution of landforms. The reactivations of the MBT and HFT have resulted in recent rejuvenation of landscapes formed in the thrust zones. In the MBT zone, the swerving of the channels, linear development of elongated depressions, sudden topographic breaks, and presence of relatively fresh‐looking escarpments, uplifted present ground surfaces, V‐shaped valleys, and occurrence of linear series of dormant and active landslides are observed. Along the Kosi River section, the vertical‐dipping Neoproterozoic Lesser Himalayan rocks have overridden the recent landslide debris along the subsidiary steep reverse faults associated with the MBT. The HFT is topographically represented by an escarpment trending ESE‐WNW along the Himalayan mountain front. In the HFT zone particularly at Ramnagar area, four levels of terraces are noted, the highest being a strath terrace. The surface trace of the HFT is offset by a transverse N‐S trending Ramnagar Fault, which coincides with the course along which Kosi Rver flows. Uplift of the hanging wall block near the HFT has resulted in subsidence of the present ground surface towards the northeast away from the HFT trace. During this process, the transverse streams have vigorously incised the uplifted surfaces. Rivers and streams realigning with the bedrock structure suggest tectonic control on morphology of drainage patterns. Neotectonic activity along the intra‐Siwalik thrust has offset a terrace surface into two surfaces that are separated by a fault scarp of about 50 m high. The bedrocks in the HFT region are gentle to steep dipping towards NW/NE/ESE. Both normal and reverse faults are recognized in the bedrocks. The general trend of the lineaments, which are concentrated in the thrust zones, is E‐W. Two transverse faults trending nearly N‐S cut and offset the HFT. Tectonic activity during the deposition of the Upper Siwalik rocks is evident from the occurrence of liquefaction features. Soft‐sediment deformation structures are observed in fine‐ to medium‐grained friable sandstones. These include up‐welled structures (with vertical to inclined bedding planes), sand dykes, faults (reverse and normal), folds, pseudo‐nodules, and deformed laminations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Structural and morphotectonic signatures in conjunction with the geomorphic indices are synthesised to trace the role of transverse tectonic features in shaping the landforms developed along the frontal part of the eastern Arunachal sub-Himalaya. Mountain front sinuosity ( S mf ) index values close to one are indicative of the active nature of the mountain front all along the eastern Arunachal Himalaya, which can be directly attributed to the regional uplift along the Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFT). However, the mountain front is significantly sinusoidal around junctions between HFT/MBT (Main Boundary Thrust) and active transverse faults. The high values of stream length gradient ( SL ) and stream steepness ( K s ) indices together with field evidence of fault scarps, offset of terraces, and deflection of streams are markers of neotectonic uplift along the thrusts and transverse faults. This reactivation of transverse faults has given rise to extensional basins leading to widening of the river courses, providing favourable sites for deposition of recent sediments. Tectonic interactions of these transverse faults with the Himalayan longitudinal thrusts (MBT/HFT) have segmented the mountain front marked with varying sinuosity. The net result is that a variety of tectonic landforms recognized along the mountain front can be tracked to the complex interactions among the transverse and longitudinal tectonic elements. Some distinctive examples are: in the eastern extremity of NE Himalaya across the Dibang River valley, the NW-SE trending mountain front is attenuated by the active Mishmi Thrust that has thrust the Mishmi crystalline complex directly over the alluvium of the Brahmaputra plains. The junction of the folded HFT and Mishmi Thrust shows a zone of brecciated and pulverized rocks along which transverse axial planar fracture cleavages exhibit neotectonic activities in a transverse fault zone coinciding with the Dibang River course. Similarly, the transverse faults cut the mountain front along the Sesseri, Siluk, Siku, Siang, Mingo, Sileng, Dikari, and Simen rivers. At some such junctions, landforms associated with the active right-lateral strike-slip faults are superposed over the earlier landforms formed by transverse normal faults. In addition to linear transverse features, we see evidence that the fold-thrust belt of the frontal part of the Arunachal Himalaya has also been affected by the neotectonically active NW-SE trending major fold known as the Siang antiform that again is aligned transverse to the mountain front. The folding of the HFT and MBT along this antiform has reshaped the landscape developed between its two western and eastern limbs running N-S and NW-SE, respectively. The transverse faults are parallel to the already reported deep-seated transverse seismogenic strike-slip fault. Therefore, a single take home message is that any true manifestation of the neotectonics and seismic hazard assessment in the Himalayan region must take into account the role of transverse tectonics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]