Search

Objective: To investigate differences in performance on a widely used cognitive screener between community-dwelling older adults from two disparate socioeconomic groups. Participants and Methods: Participants were part of a larger study of cognitive screening in healthy older adults. The total sample (N=79, 69.6% female, 19% White/Caucasian, 12.7% Asian, 43% Latino/a, 25.3% Black/African-American) consisted of community-dwelling adults (M age=73.1 years [SD =7.2] and M education=14.3 years [SD =2.6]) who were initially recruited via social media, flyers, and general community announcements. A lack of ethnic minority participants resulted in a two-year commitment to reach communities of color via visits and provision of health literacy to local religious and community programs. Continuous contact with leaders/gatekeepers helped establish research study credibility and forge a stronger sense of trust among ethnically diverse participants in the greater Houston, TX, area. Testing was initially conducted at the clinical study site. Due to low participation rates among people of color, greater effort was placed on tailored strategies to overcome economic and time constraints (i.e., schedule/time conflicts, lack of transportation, inability to pay for parking). To fit the priorities and needs of the participants, testing was also conducted at their homes (25.3%) and nearby religious and community centers (22.8%). Participants identifying as Latino/a or Black were predominantly recruited and tested at their local community center (as requested by gatekeepers/participants) to increase access to the study, in contrast to Caucasian participants. Median income estimates were used to stratify participants by socioeconomic status (SES) based on zip codes into low SES (L-SES) or high SES (H-SES) groups. Results: Participants from the L-SES group had significantly lower total scores on the MoCA than their H-SES counterparts, t (77 J =2.837, p =0.003, g =0.696. The average MoCA total score for participants from the L-SES group was 2.64 points lower. The observed differences in MoCA total score when stratifying by ethnicity may be attributable to differences in education level and SES, which are known risk factors for cognitive impairment and will be further examined upon recruitment completion. Conclusions: Studies have found that ethnically diverse older adults not only encounter more barriers to accessing quality health care but also experience disparities in brain health research. Communities of color comprise a sizeable portion of our older adults but have been traditionally underrepresented in clinical research, limiting the generalizability of research findings to clinical treatment. Socioeconomic deprivation has been identified as one of several barriers to research engagement for people of color, placing ethnic communities at increased risk for under- or misdiagnosis and limited access to medical intervention. Preliminary findings have implications for the recruitment of ethnically diverse groups in clinical research. Given the growing racial and ethnic diversity among the United States population, we must do our due diligence to increase understanding of participation and recruitment barriers for racial/ethnic individuals. Tailored community outreach and engagement strategies may be effective in improving the inclusion of ethnically diverse populations and facilitating recruitment and retention in clinical research studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]