Search

Introduction: Polyetheretherketone, also known as PEEK, is a semicrystalline thermoplastic material with many advantages. Since its grey material, it has to veneering with composite resin to enhance its aesthetic appeal. Bonding PEEK and composite veneers poses challenges due to its inert surface. Aim: To assess and compare the Shear Bond Strength (SBS) between various polyetheretherketone materials and veneering composites following various surface treatments. Materials and Methods: The in-vitro study was conducted at KSR Dental College and Hospital in Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India, over a period of three months from December 2022 to February 2023. A total of 108 PEEK discs were prepared for the study, divided into three groups: unfilled PEEK, 30% carbon reinforced PEEK, and 10% carbon + 10% graphite + 10% Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) reinforced PEEK. The specimens underwent different surface treatments, including no treatment, sandblasting with 110 um alumina particles, and acid etching with 98% sulphuric acid. Additionally, 108 composite discs were prepared and bonded to the PEEK specimens using adhesive and resin cement. The bonded specimens were immersed in distilled water for 24 hours, and the Shear Bond Strength (SBS) was determined using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, and mean values were compared using posthoc tests. Results: The results indicated significant variation in SBS among the three groups without treatment (p=0.011) and after sandblasting with 110 um alumina (p=<0.001). The 30% carbon reinforced PEEK exhibited the highest SBS regardless of the surface treatments. Conclusion: Among the tested materials, 30% carbon reinforced PEEK demonstrated the highest SBS, regardless of the surface treatments. Acid etching yielded the highest SBS among the various surface treatments, irrespective of the type of PEEK material used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In this double-blinded randomized controlled trial, we compare the long-term clinicoradiological effects of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyether ether ketone implant (ACDF with PEEK) versus artificial cervical disc (cervical disc arthroplasty [CDA]) in patients with single and bilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). Aims: We aimed to compare the pain scores, cervical kinematics, and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing CDA and ACDF for single and bilevel CDDD over 5 years. Settings and Design: This study was carried out from 2010 to 2019 in the Neurosurgery Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital attached to a Medical College in India. Subjects and Methods: We enrolled 30 patients in each group. Clinical and radiological assessments were carried out for all patients over a period of 5 years. Statistical Analysis Used: Wilcoxon Signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Fischer's exact test were used for comparing the preoperative and follow-uP values. R software version 3.6.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: A significant improvement in the cervical range of motion, sagittal range of motion (ROM), and functional spinal unit (FSU) was observed in the CDA group at final follow-up, while the PEEK group reported a significant decrease in the ROM and FSU and the difference between the two groups was also found to be statistically significant. Conclusions: When assessed over 5 years following surgery, we found CDA to be superior with respect to ROM, FSU, overall cervical alignment, and maintenance of disc height when compared to ACDF with PEEK implant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]