Search

This research paper shed light on how small cap companies acquire funds. It focuses on a new trend available for small companies and for private investors instead of an old option or traditional way of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) to raise money. The study focuses on changes happening. It justifies it for different reasons like new technology, too many rules for Initial Public Offerings, uncertain stock markets, wanting more control over their business, and thinking about growing for a long time. To understand these reasons better, the research referred to information from financial reports, academic studies, and market analysis. It focuses on small companies and private investors in India. The study suggests that small companies are now looking at other trending options to acquire money, like crowdfunding platforms and Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs), instead of just doing Initial Public Offerings. These alternatives have different advantages for the small cap companies like fewer rules to follow, more control over their business, and a focus on long-term growth. The research study focused on new trends or patterns of raising funds for companies like direct listings and using SPACs instead of Initial Public Offerings In nutshell this research helps us to know how small companies are changing their way of acquiring money. It gives insights that can help entrepreneurs, investors, and financial experts make better decisions in today's complex financial world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This paper aims to review, discuss and synthesize the literature focusing on the Indian initial public offering (IPO) market. Understanding the Indian IPO market can help answer broader corporate finance questions. The growing number of IPOs in the Indian context, coupled with the increasing importance of the Indian economy in the global market, makes this review an essential topic. Design/methodology/approach: The systematic literature review methodology was adopted to review 111 papers published between 2002 and 2021. The authors used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach during the review process. Additionally, the authors use a bibliometric review methodology to examine the pattern and trend of research in this area of interest. Furthermore, the authors conduct a critical review and synthesis of the top 20 papers based on citations. The authors also use a co-citation network and manual content analysis method to identify key research themes. Findings: This review helps in identifying major themes of research in this area of interest. The authors find that majority of the research has focused on IPO performance whereas post-IPO performance needs critical attention as well. The authors develop a comprehensive framework and future research agenda based on their discussion. Research limitations/implications: Meta-analysis of the literature can be conducted to gain better insights into the findings of prior studies. Practical implications: This review paper develops a comprehensive overview on Indian IPO market which can be of interest not only to Indian scholarship. India as an economy is increasingly gaining attention at the global level. Hence, the future research objectives as illustrated in the study can be of interest for the global scholarship also. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review paper that examines, synthesizes and outlines the future research agenda on Indian IPO studies. This review can be useful for researchers, business policymakers, finance professionals and anyone else interested in the Indian IPO market. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of pre-IPO earnings management on investor demand in the Indian IPO market. It also examines whether earnings management by issuer firms affects IPO valuation, a topic that is underexplored in accounting research. Design/methodology/approach: The study uses the data of 310 IPOs from India during the period 2000–2021. The association between pre-IPO earnings management with investor demand and valuation is tested using cross-sectional ordinary least squares regression models with heteroscedasticity-robust standard errors. Findings: The study finds that the degree of pre-IPO earnings management impacts retail investor demand, measured as their over-subscription multiple. Pre-IPO earnings management is unrelated to institutional investor bidding. Further, this paper suggests no relation between pre-IPO earnings management and IPO valuation. Research limitations/implications: Future studies could explore various other forms of earnings management and their impact on investor demand and valuation. Practical implications: The findings of this study will help the investors and regulators to understand the practice of earnings management among IPO firms and how it is related to IPO demand and valuation. Originality/value: This study contributes to the existing literature on IPO-earnings management and investor demand by documenting that issuer firms engage in earnings management to influence investor demand, particularly retail investor demand. Analysis of IPO valuation reveals that earnings management is mostly unrelated to IPO valuation, contrary to the general perception in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The study examines the IPO resilience grounded on the firm's intrinsic factors. Design/methodology/approach: We examine the association of IPO performance and post-listing firm's performance with issuers' pre-listing financial and qualitative traits using panel data regression. Findings: IPOs floated in the Indian market from July 2009 to March 31, 2022, evince the notable influence of issuers' pre-IPO fundamentals and legitimacy traits on IPO returns and post-listing earning power. Where the pandemic's favorable impact is discerned on the post-listing year earning power of the issuer firms, the loss-making issuers appear to be adversely affected by the Covid disruption. Perhaps, the successful listing equipped the issuers with the financial flexibility to combat market challenges vis-à-vis failed issuers deprived of desired IPO proceeds. Research limitations/implications: High initial returns followed by a declining pattern substantiate the retail investors to be less informed vis-à-vis initial investors, valuers and underwriters, who exit post-listing after profit booking. Investing in the shares of the newly listed ventures post-listing in the secondary market can shield retail investors from the uncertainty losses of being uninformed. The IPO market needs stringent regulations ensuring the verification of the listing valuation, the firm's credentials and the intent of utilizing IPO proceeds. Healthy development of the IPO market merits reconsidering the listing of ventures with weak fundamentals suspected to withstand the market challenges. Originality/value: Given the tremendous rise in the new firm venturing into the primary market and the spike in IPOs countering the losses immediately post-opening, the study examines the loss-making and young firms IPOs separately, adding novelty to the study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study is to investigate short-run performance and whether the IPOs are over-priced or under-priced in various window periods. This study applies one-sample t-tests, capital asset pricing models, and market-adjusted excess return to quantify the short-term pricing performance as well as the risk and return of initial public offerings and market indices. The study investigates the claim that post-listing initial public offerings (IPOs) guarantee short-term gains. The twelve months following the listing, in particular, have seen the biggest gains. According to reports, investors who buy shares in IPOs get strong returns in this period. The market-adjusted initial returns for the IPOs registered on the National Stock Exchange between January 2019 and December 2020 have been found to be roughly 44%, per this analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary capital market i.e. Initial Public Offering (IPO) market forms a significant part of it. India, an emerging market, has seen tremendous growth in the BSE SME IPO market over the past few years. In light of this, the Underpricing of BSE SME IPOs is being examined. This study aims to investigate and Analyze the determinants of Underpricing of BSE SME IPOs in the India. This study examines the cause-and-effect relationship and Impact of Raw Return and Market Adjusted Excess Return between Issue Price, Issue Size, Lot Size, Market Return and Volatility of BSE SME IPOs of Underpricing in India. There is a significant relationship between Raw Return and Market Adjusted Excess Return between lot size, volatility, market return, issue size, issue price of S&P BSE SME IPO. The null hypothesis is rejected at 5% level of significant for the Specific variables among Raw Return and Market Adjusted Excess Return in the Study Period. While investing in an S&P BSE SME IPO the investor should be careful and they may choose long-term investment because there is a low risk and they can earn a return at longtime. The Present Study Provides a detailed analysis of S&P BSE SME IPO in India and Underpricing of Raw Return and Market Adjusted Excess Return relationship and impact for 10 years January 2013 to December 2022 by taking a yearly observation. At the same time, they have a Strong Relationship between the issuespecific and market-specific variables like volatility and market return and integrated with each other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pricing of an Initial public offering (IPO) is a complex phenomenon. Price anomalies are commonly observed in IPO markets, especially in emerging markets. Investors perceived underpricing creates undue market momentum during the offer period with an asymmetric effect across different issue sizes. This study examines the determinants of Book Built IPOs underpricing by considering a sample of 180 Book Built IPOs that went public in India between 2011 and 2020. The determinants were verified for differential issue size public offers. Listing day performance was measured using Listing Day-Absolute Return (LD-AR) and Listing Day-Market Adjusted Return (LD-MAR) models. Further, the data obtained was tested for the explanatory capabilities of firm-specific and market momentum factors for underpricing using OLS models. Concerning the differential issue size, the study found a direct relationship between the issue size and underpricing. Dominant underpricing was observed in the case of moderate to large issue size with a linear progressive return, confirming that there was over-optimism on the part of investors. The study's results also revealed that momentum-specific factors have a significant influence along with firm-specific factors such as firm size, cash flows, a subscription rate of QIBs and RIIs in the listing day return, and underpricing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, we examine the role of domestic and foreign venture capital and private equity (VCPE) firms in India. We find robust evidence that portfolio firms backed by foreign VCPE firms incorporate effective governance structures after the initial public offering (IPO). Specifically, these firms are associated with smaller, more independent, and gender‐diverse boards. Furthermore, our results suggest that foreign VCPE firms continue their association with their portfolio firms in the post‐IPO period by nominating directors to the boards. Our results also suggest that portfolio firms backed by foreign VCPE firms are associated with better long‐term operating performance and profitability. This positive effect is exacerbated by the presence of independent and female directors. Collectively, our results support the view that good governance practices are key to the long‐term success of a business, especially in economies that lack good legal systems, developed financial markets, and alternative investment opportunities and where developing trust between parties in a transaction is crucial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to examine earnings management around initial public offerings (IPOs) in India. It also explores the influence of issue characteristics on earnings management around the IPOs. Design/methodology/approach: A sample of 511 IPOs that came during April 2003-March 2019 is studied for calculating earnings management for pre-issue, issue and post-issue years. Using Cross-Sectional Modified Jones Model, the paper presents earnings management on the basis of three proxies i.e. discretionary accruals, discretionary current accruals and discretionary long-term accruals. The influence of issue characteristics on earnings management practised around the IPOs is also observed through correlation and multiple regression analysis. Findings: The paper finds that earnings management is abnormally high during the issue year compared with pre-issue and post-issue years. It also unveils that profitability, premium, age, and size of the issuer significantly determine the level of pre-issue and issue year earnings management practised by Indian IPO issuers. Research limitations/implications: The findings are useful to stakeholders (potential investors, analysts and regulators) to observe, assess and understand the quality of financial numbers that are based on fallacious disclosure of accounting figures. It provides insight into the possibilities of managed earnings around the issue that could influence investors' decision-making. Further, the study reflects the efficacy of Indian regulatory norms for IPOs. Originality/value: To the authors' knowledge, it is the only Indian study that had used an extensive data set of about two decades to calculate earnings management during pre-issue, issue and post-issue years. The uniqueness of the study further lies in three proxies of earnings management representing short-term and long-term accruals. Moreover, it is the first study to observe the influence of IPO issue characteristics on earnings management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary focus of this paper is to develop an empirical model to study the relationship between key Financial Performance Indicators and IPO Offer Prices. It seeks to assist Indian IPO investors to make more informed decisions by advancing their knowledge about relevant Pre-IPO Financial Performance Indicators that are effective predictors of Offer Price. The purpose is this study is to provide all the stakeholders with an approach to evaluate the Offer Price of IPOs. This will help the stakeholders to overcome pricing anomalies. The companies listed in the National Stock Exchange of India between the financial years 2015–2016 to 2020–2021 are taken as the sample of the study. The secondary data are analyzed by constructing a multiple linear regression model. This study uses a range of fundamental factors related to financial performance in a single framework to demonstrate that an IPO Offer Price can be assessed by its Pre-IPO Financial Performance. The findings of this study validate the objectives of the model constructed. This research shows that the Pre-IPO Financial Performance has an influential role in explaining the IPO offering price. The results of the study show that variables such as Net Asset Value (NAV), Return on Assets (ROA), Profit after Tax (PAT), and Return on Net Worth (RONW) have a substantial impact on IPO Offering Price. The findings of the research will assist IPO issuers in pricing their offerings better and more competitively. Furthermore, this study will also minimize the gap between offering and listing prices to prevent speculative failure. The study will help investors with minimal resources to evaluate the value of any IPO issue. An IPO's value can be fairly estimated, and investors can decide whether the issue is worth investing in or not. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The present study aims to examine the short-term effect of disinvestment oriented IPOs and FPOs on the stock market performance of Indian central public sector enterprises (CPSEs), which divested their equity between 2000 and 2017. Design/methodology/approach: The analysis of stock price reaction is conducted for listing dates only in the case of IPOs and three different dates in the case of FPOs through the event study methodology. The three-event dates related to FPOs are public notification date (PND), issue announcement date (IAD) and price band date (PBD). Findings: Overall empirical analysis indicates that investor sentiments are generally insignificant prior to and posts the PND (first date). The second major date of announcement that is (IAD) is new information in the market and returns are found to be significantly negative across both the periods that is before and after IAD. Thus, the analysis depicts strongly negative investor sentiments in the case of IAD. These results are further substantiated by negatively significant CAR (cumulative abnormal returns) values for both the pre and post-event windows of PBD as well. Research limitations/implications: Empirical analysis concludes that investors do not stand a chance to gain abnormal returns through initiating positions in the stocks of CPSEs during the alternative event dates analyzed. Originality/value: Since the year 2000, disinvestment through public offering has gathered momentum, and this mode accounts for approximately 62% of the collective disinvestment funds generated by the government of India till now. But there have been very limited research studies on the market performance of disinvested CPSEs. This analysis provides new empirical evidence for the market reactions of retail investors in response to the sale of equity by the Indian government in CPSEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Covid 19 Pandemic has deeply affected almost all the world and India is no exception. With other segment of the market, the Indian primary market too witnesses some activity during the pandemic and its performance of the primary market was impacted in terms of number of IPOs hitting the market and their post listing performance. Though many studies have been carried out to analyse this, not many have dug deeper into specific companies and analysed the performance of all the companies that have been listed through this period. The performance of company's post getting listed and how the pandemic has affected these companies have yet to be studied in detail. Through this research paper the researchers aim to fulfil this gap and understand the effects of the pandemic on the performance of primary market. The research is based on secondary data from the financial markets. The data comprises of 30 companies that came out with their IPO during the year 2016 to 2021 according to their market capitalization. Multiple Regression, t-test and Event Study Techniques have been applied to analyse and evaluate the impact of Covid 19 on the performance of companies which came up with their Initial Public Offering from 2016 to 2021. Result showed that Covid 19 impacted the companies which came out with their IPOs between 2016 and 2021. Also, Primary market saw a greater number of IPOs hitting the market due to a well performing secondary market during this period. The study is useful for market participants, analysts and investors to understand the impact of Covid 19 on Primary market as well as the performance post listing so that they can take informed decision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aims to explore the moderating impact of governance structure, that is, board characteristics including board size, board independence, board committees and ownership structure like ownership concentration, on the underpricing of small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME) initial public offerings (IPOs) in the context of an emerging economy such as India. Design/methodology/approach: Using a sample size of 403 SME IPOs listed on Bombay Stock Exchange SME platform and National Stock Exchange EMERGE, this study uses moderated hierarchical regression analysis to investigate these relationships. Findings: The findings highlighted that board independence, board committees and ownership concentration negatively influence underpricing measured using market-adjusted excess returns. While analysing the moderating relationship, this study finds that ownership concentration positively moderates the relationship between board independence and underpricing, as well as the relationship between board committees and IPO underpricing. Research limitations/implications: This study is limited to a single country only. Although perfectly suitable for our research inquiry, it is imperative to check the validity of the findings by extending it to other emerging countries with similar socio-economic characteristics. Furthermore, this study tested the hypotheses concerning three board characteristics only. Hence, it could be extended to explore additional governance characteristics for a more comprehensive understanding. Practical implications: This study provides a foundation for managers to adopt a fine-grained approach to effectively design the board structure ahead of an IPO event. Additionally, the findings may assist policymakers in formulating various policies and guide regulators in regulating the limit on ownership held by various shareholders to prevent their opportunism. The results of this study may further advise potential investors interested in SME IPO firms to critically consider the ownership concentration as a driving factor when scrutinizing their investment portfolios. Originality/value: This study is unique as it advances the debate on the importance of a governance characteristic, that is, ownership concentration, as a moderating variable in the underexplored context of IPO underpricing of small- and medium-sized firms in India. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last three decades of neoliberalization, India's fossil fuel infrastructures have been transformed into an archipelago of coal-fired power plants and industrial ports in coastal zones. Drawing upon the case of coal infrastructures sited on the coast of south India, this article tracks processes of what I call "fossil neoliberalism": the ways in which neoliberal modes of governance have transformed the state into an agent of market-based fossil fuel extraction. The article calls for attention to how particular technologies of governance—from disinvestment and initial public offerings to corporatized landlord ports—have reconfigured and respatialized, rather than reduced, the role of the state in processes of fossil fuel extraction. The article also analyzes how fossil neoliberalism, as an ensemble of market-based technologies of governance, is enabled by coastal zone illegalities and limited by political mobilizations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In initial public offerings (IPOs), the media plays a pivotal role by disseminating the information to the investors who generally lack the expertise to understand the information through the prospectus. Thus, media coverage can impact the investment decision of the investors and the IPO performance. Media typically covers the IPO before listing, suggesting that it may play an important role in explaining the opening price rather than the closing price on the day of listing. Therefore, this study aims to disaggregate the traditional IPO underpricing into three categories: voluntary, pre-market and post-market and provides a comparative analysis of the media sentiments impact on the traditional and disaggregated IPO underpricing. The authors' disaggregated IPO underpricing analysis will facilitate the investors in making an effective investment strategy based on media sentiments. Design/methodology/approach: The study deploys sentiment analysis using bags of n (2) grams approach to gauge the sentiments on 2,891 media articles and uses "robust-regression" technique to analyze them on a sample of 222 Indian IPOs during 2009–2018. Findings: The study reports that the sentiment score is positively related to the traditional underpricing; the sentiment score is positively associated with the pre-market underpricing and does not have any significant relationship with the post-market underpricing; the number of media articles does not play a significant role in explaining the IPO underpricing. The findings highlight the presence of a semi-strong form of efficiency in the Indian IPO market. Originality/value: Existing literature focuses that the role of media on IPO performance is based on the developed countries. IPO laws differ based on the countries. For instance, in India, investors can check the demand by the other categories of investors on a real-time basis. Thus, it is interesting to study whether, with such a high level of transparency, media can explain IPO performance in the Indian market. Media generally covers IPO before listing; therefore, the present study disaggregates the IPO underpricing to evaluate the role of media on the primary and secondary market separately. It will help the investors to decide when to enter and exit the market. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of earnings management during initial public offerings on the listing day returns. Design/methodology/approach: The study collected data for 511 Indian IPOs that came between April 2003 and March 2019 for calculating earnings management. On the basis of the Cross Sectional Modified Jones Model 1995, the paper presents three proxies of earnings management as discretionary accruals (DA), discretionary current accruals (DCA) and discretionary long-term accruals (DLA). The study further used correlation and multiple regression analysis to assess the impact of earnings management on listing day returns. Findings: The findings show that earnings management and listing day returns vary through issue-year and industry-type. Apart from it, the study reveals a greater contribution of short-term accruals in earnings management on the basis of higher DCA values. It also discloses that the aggregate level of earnings management (DA) influences listing returns, whereas DCA and DLA separately have no impact on the listing day returns of the Indian IPOs. Research limitations/implications: The findings are useful to potential investors and analysts to observe, assess and understand the quality of financial reports that are based on fallacious disclosure of accounting figures. The study also reflects the efficacy of Indian regulatory norms for IPOs in constraining earnings management and underpricing, thus providing meaningful insight to the policy makers and the regulators. Originality/value: This study is distinguished by its focus on determining the influence of earnings management on listing day returns in Indian IPOs by using three earnings management proxies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Initial public offerings (IPOs) have a special place in finance, probably because they are the first opportunity to value a number of financial assets of company by variousparticipants of capital market. In India, initial public offerings (IPOs) have attracted many investors. Because companies coming out with IPOs are new and have no historical data to analyze. The success of IPO is critical for stockholders, companies, and the economy. Objectives: 1. To Study different IPOs during 2020-22 2. To analyze performance of Indian IPOs in short Run time frame. Research Approach The work in this research paper is carried out on the basis of empirical evidence. The study encompasses 33 IPOs which got listed on NSE of India for the period between 2020-2022. Thework is based on data collected from sources which are secondary in nature. The data required for research work is taken from website of National stock Exchange of India in the form of price quotes of shares and Nifty values. Themarket adjusted short term performance model, wealth relative index model along with other statistical measures is used for the study. Scope of work- The research work is restricted to companies which came out with public issues during the above specified period and got listed on NSE of India. Period -Year 2020-2022 Limitations of Study-The study covers external factors which affects the IPO performance. Originality-This research work is original and examines stock's listing profit or loss and its performance after the listing on recognized stock exchange. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the impact of the underwriters' syndicate size (SS) and its structure on underpricing (UP), oversubscription rate, liquidity and volatility. The authors use a database of 185 initial public offers (IPOs) issued in India during the period 2012–2019. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have used ordinary least squares regression and stepwise regression on cross-sectional data to construct the regression model for the dependent variables under consideration, namely, UP, subscription rate (SUB), listing day volatility and listing day liquidity. Findings: The authors find that larger syndicates reduce UP. The authors also find strong evidence of a larger subscription rate for IPOs managed by larger syndicates, suggesting that larger syndicates generate more information in the market. Looking into the composition of investment banks in the syndicate, the authors find that syndicates comprising more lead managers and comanagers attract a higher subscription from potential investors. More book running lead managers and nonmanaging syndicate members help increase liquidity and reduce the volatility of IPO stocks on listing day. Additionally, the authors find that larger firms with reputed lead managers establish larger syndicates while venture-affiliated IPO firms prefer a smaller syndicate. Practical implications: The findings would interest issuing firms, investors, intermediaries and policymakers engaged in formulating syndicates for better management of IPOs. Originality/value: The study extends the present literature on IPO syndicates, particularly in the Indian context as an emerging economy. The study extended the present understanding of SS and composition, creating value for the issuers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines the relationship between the extent of earnings management in a firm, the level of underpricing during an initial public offering (IPO), and their long-term performance. Earnings management has been acknowledged as a matter of concern during IPOs since long; however, its relationship with underpricing and long-term returns remained inconclusive in emerging markets like India. Using a sample of Indian IPO firms, this study finds that firms that manage accruals aggressively in the pre-IPO period have high initial returns and subsequently low stock returns in the post-IPO period. This study also observed that firms that have used abnormal accruals more conservatively while reporting earnings have better returns in the third year after IPO compared to the firms that reported more aggressively. The results are in consonance with the theory of information asymmetry and suggest that valuation of an IPO firm becomes ambiguous with high level of earnings management, which leads to higher underpricing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we investigate whether the use of accounting conservatism in India decreases IPO underpricing, which is of attention to stakeholders and supervisors. Furthermore, the study examines how asymmetry information affects the implication of accounting conservatism for IPOs. Based on a regression analysis of 527 firms that went public through IPOs of "A" shares listed on the national stock exchanges between 2000 and 2020, the paper also examines whether the relationship between conservatism and under-pricing is robust to alternative measures of accounting conservatism, mean regressions, sample exclusions, and endogenous treatment models. The research study finds that accounting conservatism is negatively associated with the degree of IPO under-pricing, and the association between accounting conservatism and IPO under-pricing is more perceptible when information asymmetry is high. The paper's originality should shed light on what drives IPO underpricing and how it could be affected by accounting conservatism in an Indian economy, and provide find evidence that legal origin, a factor linked to the practice of conservatism, influences the relationship between under-pricing and conservatism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Timely access to reasonably priced financing is critical to promote and sustain small and medium sized businesses (SMEs). This study aims to examine the role of the newly constituted SME exchanges in funding the growth of Indian SME firms. The impact of obtaining public equity capital on the firm's growth prospects, capital structure and credit profile is the focus of this paper. In addition, this study compares the cost and speed of raising capital on specialised SME exchanges to the main board. Design/methodology/approach: To examine the impact of raising public equity capital, this study uses a difference-in-difference (DID) regression analysis. SMEs that raised financing on the SME exchange between 2013 and 2018 make up the treatment sample. This study uses a propensity score matching technique to find the control group from a sample of unlisted enterprises to reduce the likelihood of selection bias. Findings: This study finds that SME profitability drops after an initial public offering (IPO), which is consistent with previous research. This study also discovered that after a company is listed, its total debt falls. This study also shows that after the IPO, there is no change in the borrowing costs of SME enterprises. Finally, this study finds an evidence of a decline in sales growth following the IPO, implying that the firms use the IPO money to rebalance their accounts after a period of heavy investment rather than for growth finance. Originality/value: A thriving and efficient equity financing market for SMEs has the potential to establish itself as a viable alternative to the existing dominant bank financing option. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this research is the first to examine the role of SME exchanges in the funding of Indian SME firms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPAC) are created so that investors can invest based on their confidence in the ability and professional expertise of the sponsors to pick the right target companies to acquire and take public. Proceeds from a SPAC Initial Public Offering (IPO) are generally held in a trust within an escrow account till a suitable target is acquired by the SPAC. This enables shareholders to vote on any proposed acquisition by the sponsor prior to the business combination transaction. Studies show that most of the SPAC currently listed in the US and European exchanges are domicile neutral. So far, the Indian legislature has not come up with any comprehensive regulatory requirement for the SPAC. The booming corporate growth in India as witnessed by more than 72 IPOs in 2021 so far portends a positive outlook for SPAC in India and calls for the regulatory framework to be in place along with necessary provisions made in applicable laws. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

India's capital markets were liberalised 30 years ago, along with economic liberalisation. Did the opening up of the primary capital markets improve firms? access to capital? If it did, then is the access uniform across firms? If not, what have been the characteristics of firms that have benefitted disproportionately in terms of access to capital consequent upon liberalization of primary markets. As the primary capital markets mature in India, in terms of market characteristics and regulation, over the last three decades, how has it changed the access to capital for Indian businesses overtime. In particular, which are the sectors that have witnessed maximum primary issuances? We answer these questions using emperical evidence from companies that chose to go public in India in the last three decades. There is evidence of predominance of non-financial companies that go for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). Further, of the 152 industry groups analysed, there is a high degree of concentration of companies that went public. The top 3% of the industry groups (5 in number) accounted for 36% of all IPO firms. The top 6% and 9% (numbering 10 and 15 groups) accounted for 45% and 52% of all firms going public. In terms of type of issuances, Indian firms prefer to raise capital from the primary markets via private placements rather than public offerings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Prior studies document that managers engaged in shifting of non-operating revenue to operating revenue (revenue shifting) and shifting of operating expenses to non-operating expenses (expense shifting (ES)) within income statement to report inflated operating profits of firms. This study aims to identify the factors affecting revenue shifting and ES. Design/methodology/approach: The operating revenue model (Malikov et al., 2018) and the core earnings expectation model (McVay, 2006) are used for measuring revenue shifting and ES, respectively. The panel data regression models are used to analyze the data for this study. Findings: The study results show that large and old firms are engaged in revenue shifting, whereas small and young firms prefer ES over revenue shifting for reporting inflated operating profits. These results imply that firms choose the shifting strategy based on relative advantage and ease in execution. The results are robust after controlling for accruals earnings management, real earnings management and endogeneity bias. Practical implications: It suggests investors minutely investigate the operating performance metrics of initial public offering firms that are relatively small and young while buying their shares. Besides, findings suggest accounting standard setters make more mandatory disclosure requirements for recording expense and revenue items in the income statement to curb this corporate misfeasance of classification shifting. Originality/value: This is among the earlier attempts to identify firm-specific factors that incentivize firms to prefer one form of shifting over another. Second, the study jointly examines both forms of shifting by taking a uniform sample of firms over the same period. Most of the prior studies have examined one form at a time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Pricing affairs of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) and their performance in stock market are among the most widely discussed phenomena in economics literature. These two conceptions are critical to an IPO's success or failure. This research paper explores the actual relationship lies between the Pricing of IPOs and their subsequent performance. The study is based on the data of 123 mainstream Indian IPOs which got listed in NSE during 2015 to 2020. The methodical results explain that price adjustment value, percent change in price band value, and offered price value has a significant impact on underpricing/overpricing for selected IPOs. The findings show that, in India, underpricing/overpricing accounts for a higher percentage of IPOs subscription but do not have any impact on the average mean stock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Researches in the past have globally witnessed two anomalies in the IPO market viz. Underpricing and Underperformance. The study finds that on an average IPOs have generated 12.35% as listing gain which is less than what was reported in earlier studies. Variables like issue size, subscription rate and timing of the IPO have shown ability to impact the listing performance. As timing of IPO is a significant variable, Window of Opportunity hypothesis withstands. Performance of IPOs in long run is painfully poor. IPO returns for one year, three years and five years holding period stands at -5.40%, -15.81% and 4.19% respectively. Underpricing is negatively correlated with the long run performance. Subscription rate is also a significant determinant of the performance of IPOs. The findings validate Winner's Curse, Divergence of Opinion and Impresario Hypotheses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study sets out to identify the factors determining Initial Public Offerings (IPO) in India. The sample for our study covers on a monthly frequency from April 2001 through December 2017. Where, volume of IPO, i.e., number of companies that have gone public is taken as the dependent variable and it is regressed on variables that capture the macroeconomic scenario as well as investor's confidence. Having a count dependent variable, we have employed Poisson regression and negative binomial regression techniques to estimate the parameters. The results from our study confirms the significance of the chosen variables in determining IPOs in India. However, it is the role secondary market variables like stock returns, liquidity and volatility that stands out prominent among other factors like economic growth, interest rate, inflation, credit and FII's. Apart from these conventional variables, we also find investor's perception about businesses measured by business confidence index (BCI), to be an influential factor in determining the volume of IPOs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]