1. Clinical profile and outcome of non-COVID strokes during pandemic and the pre pandemic period: COVID-Stroke Study Group (CSSG) India.
- Author
-
Bhatia R, Sylaja PN, Srivastava MVP, Komakula S, Iype T, Parthasarathy R, Khurana D, Pardasani V, Pamidimukkala V, Kumaravelu S, Pandian J, Kushwaha S, Chowdhury D, Gupta S, Rajendran SP, Reddy R, Roy J, Sharma A, Nambiar V, Rai NK, Upadhyay AD, Parkipandla S, Singh MB, Vibha D, Vishnu VY, Rajan R, Gupta A, Pandit AK, Agarwal A, Gaikwad SB, Garg A, Joseph L, Sreedharan SE, Reddy S, Sreela K, Ramachandran D, George GB, Panicker P, Suresh MK, Gupta V, Ray S, Suri V, Ahuja C, Kajal K, Lal V, Singh RK, Oza H, Halani H, Sanivarapu S, Sahonta R, Duggal A, Dixit P, Kulkarni GB, Taallapalli AVR, Parmar M, Chalasani V, Kashyap M, Misra B, Pachipala S, Yogeesh PM, Salunkhe M, and Gupta P
- Subjects
- Communicable Disease Control, Humans, India epidemiology, Pandemics, Retrospective Studies, SARS-CoV-2, Time-to-Treatment, COVID-19, Stroke epidemiology, Stroke therapy
- Abstract
Background: As the health systems around the world struggled to meet the challenges of COVID-19 pandemic, care of many non-COVID emergencies was affected., Aims: The present study examined differences in the diagnosis, evaluation and management of stroke patients during a defined period in the ongoing pandemic in 2020 when compared to a similar epoch in year 2019., Methods: The COVID stroke study group (CSSG) India, included 18 stroke centres spread across the country. Data was collected prospectively between February and July 2020 and retrospectively for the same period in 2019. Details of demographics, stroke evaluation, treatment, in-hospital and three months outcomes were collected and compared between these two time points., Results: A total of 2549 patients were seen in both study periods; 1237 patients (48.53%) in 2019 and 1312 (51.47%) in 2020. Although the overall number of stroke patients and rates of thrombolysis were comparable, a significant decline was observed in the month of April 2020, during the initial period of the pandemic and lockdown. Endovascular treatment reduced significantly and longer door to needle and CT to needle times were observed in 2020. Although mortality was higher in 2020, proportion of patients with good outcome were similar in both the study periods., Conclusions: Although stroke admissions and rates of thrombolysis were comparable, some work flow metrics were delayed, endovascular stroke treatment rates declined and mortality was higher during the pandemic study period. Reorganization of stroke treatment pathways during the pandemic has likely improved the stroke care delivery across the globe., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF