Search

India with its 4 million cases of leprosy, accounts for one-third of the world's population of leprosy patients. One-fourth of them are below 15 years of age. We report a 5-year follow-up study of healthy children who were close contacts of leprosy patients, in order to: 1. detect subclinical infection and observe the development of overt disease by using the Fluorescent Leprosy Antibody Absorption Technique (FLA-ABS) and the lepromin test which assess the humoral and cell-mediated immunity (CMI), respectively; 2. evaluate the efficacy of dapsone as a chemoprophylactic agent in the 'at risk' contacts. Four-hundred-and-fifty-five healthy contacts were studied. Majority of the contacts of multibacillary patients (303) were FLA-ABS positive (75 percent) and lepromin negative (55 percent) showing that although most of them had been infected, the lepromin status was negative (P < 0.01). On the other hand, the majority of the contacts of paucibacillary patients (152) were lepromin positive (57 percent) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, only 61 percent of contacts of paucibacillary patients were FLA-ABS positive as compared to 75 percent of contacts of multibacillary patients demonstrating that the former had been exposed to a lesser quantum of infection (P < 0.05). On the basis of results of FLA-ABS and lepromin tests, these 455 contacts were classified into four groups, viz. Group I comprising children who were FLA-ABS positive and lepromin positive; Group II, who were FLA-ABS positive and lepromin negative; Group III, who were FLA-ABS negative and lepromin positive; and Group IV who were FLA-ABS negative and lepromin negative.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The article records the experience of treating multibacillary (BB, BL and LL) leprosy with multidrug therapy (MDT) in an urban leprosy center. The problem of leprosy is to be properly assessed throughout the Indian subcontinent because most of the epidemiological data from the areas labeled low-endemic have to be updated. The regularity of therapy must be ensured and monitored constantly, but in spite of our efforts to do so some factors were beyond our control, such as providing a means of livelihood for the migrants from other places. In addition, the intake of drugs also has to be periodically checked from the history and discoloration of skin and, most importantly, confirmed by performing random spot tests for dapsone in the urine. The main problems discussed are the difficulty in demonstrating acid-fast bacilli in slit-skin smears from the macular form of borderline leprosy (also called dimorphous macular) and, secondly, whether the duration of multibacillary therapy was adequate since only approximately 50% of our patients achieved smear negativity after taking MDT for the stipulated period of 24 months. Experiences from other centers have suggested that the duration of MDT should be prolonged in multibacillary patients to achieve smear-negative status. Yet another group notes that smear negativity is gradually achieved during the period of surveillance following stoppage of MDT after 24 months. These questions await more information from good centers with controlled field studies.

Healthy children contacts of leprosy patients had their humoral and cell-mediated immunological status assessed using the Fluorescent Leprosy Antibody Absorption Technique (FLA-ABS) and the Lepromin test, respectively. Subsequently, they were followed up for 2 1/2 years to study the development of overt disease. Two-hundred children were studied and classified into four groups, viz. Group I comprised of children who were FLA-ABS positive and Lepromin positive; Group II = FLA-ABS positive and Lepromin negative; Group III = FLA-ABS negative and Lepromin positive; Group IV = FLA-ABS negative and Lepromin negative. The good cell-mediated immune (CMI) response in the 107 children in Group I prevented them from developing the disease though they had been infected. Out of the 37 children in Group II, 15 developed the disease. There were no children in Group III. None of the 56 children in Group IV developed the disease, possibly because they had not been significantly infected. All these findings were statistically significant (P less than 0.01). This study highlights the protective role of cell-mediated immunity in leprosy. It also suggests the need to carry out surveillance surveys in the endemic population to identify and follow up those at risk.

The response to lepromin and Kveim antigens was compared and studied in 15 leprosy patients who were tuberculin negative. Of the 11 lepromin positive tuberculoid patients, 4 were Kveim positive, 1 was equivocal, and the rest were negative. Of the four lepromin negative lepromatous patients, one gave a positive Kveim test while the other three were negative. It has been shown that false-positive Kveim reactions are found in a higher percentage of South Indian leprosy patients than in those of other backgrounds, such as Japanese and Malaysian Chinese patients. It is also suggested that no definite relationship exists between the reaction of leprosy patients to lepromin and Kveim antigens. We further suggest that the anergy exhibited by lepromatous patients to the antigen of M. leprae is specific, as evidenced by the positive Kveim response in one lepromatous patient.