Search

Purpose: On-The-Go (OTG) references are those that clinicians make within a tight deadline at the point of patient care to direct critical decisions. We conducted this study to assess the knowledge level of orthopaedicians on clinical usefulness and quality appraisal of different reference methods along with their attitude towards its utility for practice. Materials and Methods: A web-based survey was administered through Google Forms among the members of the Tamil Nadu Orthopaedic Association (TNOA) by snowball sampling method. The survey was designed by the Quality Appraisal Committee (QAC) of Orthopaedic Research Group (ORG) with 17 items. Association and correlation analysis were done between different responses in the survey to find out ways to improve the reference practices. Results: 177 participants with a mean age of 43.5 years completed the survey. About 45.8% (n = 81) of participants had prior knowledge on the Oxford Levels of Evidence. However, they were not familiar with using them for critical appraisal of evidence. About 86.5% (n = 153) of participants were worried about the quality of the content they seek for reference. Among the reference sources, online research articles were used by 54.2% (n = 96), digital applications by 21.4% (n = 38), digital textbooks by 15.2% (n = 27), and other methods like peer discussion by 5.1% (n = 9). A significant association was noted between the participants who chose level I studies for their reference and their familiarity with the concept of fragility (p = 0.006) and heterogenicity (p = 0.021) and types of bias (p = 0.003). A significant association was noted between participants with active journal subscription and their familiarity with the concept of spin (p = 0.016) and their knowledge of the heterogeneity of study results (p = 0.019). We found a significant association between age (< 40 years of age) and knowledge on various types of bias (p = 0.032), heterogenicity (p = 0.01), and fragility (p = 0.021). Conclusion: This is the first study on the information-seeking behaviour of the orthopaedicians. OTG references remain a part of the orthopaedic practice and are made mostly by accessing online research articles. Imparting knowledge of their quality appraisal should be an active part of the orthopaedic curriculum. This will, in turn, improve the attitude and reference practices leading to better decision-making towards patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should be performed as per the international guidelines; however, compliance to these guidelines is difficult to assess. This study was conducted to determine the compliance to American Heart Association (2010) guideline on CPR documentation by among resident physicians before and after resident training (two arms). Methods: This pre-postinterventional quality improvement study was conducted in a referral center, North India. Data of hospitalized in-hospital CPR patients were collected in the form of quality indicators (checklists) as defined by the guideline and compared between two arms of before--after resident training. Residents were given appropriate training in CPR technique as per the guideline. The compliance of CPR documentation was assessed pre- and post-intervention. Results: The baseline arm compliance of various components of CPR documentation was low. The postintervention arm compliances of all components significantly increased (baseline, 2.5% to postintervention, 15.11%, P = 0.03). Individual components assessed were documentation of assessment of responsiveness (65% to 77.9%, P = 0.19), assessment of breathing (37.5% to 58.1%, P = 0.03), assessment of carotid pulse (62.5% to 79%, P = 0.05), rate of chest compressions (20% to 39.5%, P = 0.04), airway management (62.5% to 82.5%, P = 0.02), and compressions to breaths ratio (12.5% to 31.4%, P = 0.02). Documentation of chest compression rate compared to nondocumentation (12 of 42 vs. 11 of 84, P = 0.04) was independently associated with a higher rate of return of spontaneous circulation. The study however did not show any survival benefits. Conclusions: This study establishes that the compliance to CPR documentation is poor as assessed by CPR documentation content and quality, which improves after physician training, but not up to the mark level (100%) that may be due to busy Indian hospital settings and human behavioral factors. Due to ethical constraints of live CPR assessment, this document checklist approach may be considered as an internal quality assessment method for CPR compliance. Furthermore, correct instruction in CPR technique along with proper documentation of the procedure is required, followed up with periodic re-education during the residency period and beyond. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]