Search

This article describes results from a review of South Asian fossils in the Oxford University Museum of Natural History. These materials include two early 19th century collections of fossils from the Siwalik Hills in India. While this assemblage was summarised in 1837 by William Buckland as 'large and valuable collections of fossil bones', it has remained largely unstudied and unpublished in any detail since collection. Here, as a precursor to a comprehensive re-evaluation, we establish a chronological and geographical context of one collection event, provide details of its donor, and outline its history after arrival in Oxford. We then describe select taxa in the collection, including a well-preserved maxilla and toothrow of the large extinct giraffid, Sivatherium giganteum, as a basis to justify our current understanding of the biostratigraphic affinity of the assemblage. Conservatively, the collection is a 'classic' Upper Siwalik Plio-Pleistocene fauna, possibly the first to be transported to the UK. While further analyses will realise the scientific potential of the fossils, the narrative of their journey from India to Oxford remains incomplete. Further investigation of the hidden history of the collection is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Understanding global patterns of late Quaternary megafaunal extinction is impeded by geographic variation in data quality and quantity. The magnitude, timing and drivers of megafaunal extinctions remain poorly understood for India, a region with a strong history of palaeontological research. We review available data for all putative extinct Indian megafaunal taxa with direct or indirect reported evidence of potential survival into the global "megafaunal extinction window" (from ∼50,000 years onwards). Assessment of late Quaternary megafaunal species richness is confused by multiple levels of taxonomic uncertainty, including the relationship of named Late Pleistocene taxa to extant taxa, and nomenclatural confusion over correct species names. There is sufficient evidence to recognise up to four genuine global megafaunal species-level extinctions in India during the Late Pleistocene: two proboscideans (Palaeoloxodon namadicus , Stegodon sp.), a hippopotamus (Hexaprotodon sp.), and possibly a horse (Equus namadicus). A fifth extinct megafaunal species, the Indian aurochs Bos primigenius namadicus , definitely persisted into the Holocene. Other Indian late Quaternary megafaunal species (Rhinoceros spp., Bubalus palaeindicus , Sus " palaeindicus ", Crocodylus palaeindicus) are likely to be synonyms of extant species. Reconstructing regional extinction dynamics is further impeded by chronological uncertainty; however, attempts to obtain new dates for vertebrate samples from six late Quaternary sites in five regions were unsuccessful. Accurate understanding of the dynamics of megafaunal extinctions in India will require robust taxonomic, chronological and palaeoecological data, and we encourage further investigation of the region's rich late Quaternary record. • The magnitude and timing of megafaunal extinctions are poorly understood for India. • We review all extinct Indian megafauna that possibly survived beyond c.50,000 ka. • Indian megafaunal extinctions are confused by taxonomic and dating uncertainty. • We recognise up to four Late Pleistocene megafaunal species extinctions in India. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]