Search

Exposure studies in children are emphasized nowadays given children's higher consumption vulnerability. The present study generated national-level data covering 16 major states of India on the usage pattern of colours and it identified food commodities through which a particular colour has the scope to exceed ADI limits. Out of the total analysed samples, 87.8% contained permitted colours, of which only 48% adhered to the prescribed limit of 100 mg kg−1. The majority of candyfloss, sugar toys, beverages, mouth fresheners, ice candy and bakery product samples exceeded the prescribed limit. Non-permitted colours were mostly prevalent in candyfloss and sugar toy samples. Though sunset yellow FCF (SSYFCF) and tartrazine were the two most popular colours, many samples used a blend of two or more colours. The blend of SSYFCF and tartrazine exceeded the prescribed limit by a factor of 37 in one sample, and the median and 95th percentile levels of this blend were 4.5- and 25.7-fold, respectively. The exposure assessment showed that the intake of erythrosine exceeded the ADI limits by two to six times at average levels of detected colours, whereas at the 95th percentile level both SSYFCF and erythrosine exceeded the respective ADI limits by three- to 12-fold in all five age groups. Thus, the uniform prescribed limit of synthetic colours at 100 mg kg−1 under Indian rules needs to be reviewed and should be governed by consumption profiles of the food commodities to check the unnecessary exposure of excessive colours to those vulnerable in the population that may pose a health risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Curcumin, the principal curcuminoid of turmeric, is responsible for its yellow colour and serves as a measure of turmeric quality. The Prevention of Food Adulteration (PFA) Act of India allows only Curcuma longa L. for the production of turmeric powder and prohibits addition of any foreign matter/artificial colour, but it does not specify a minimum curcumin content. The present surveillance was undertaken to study the quality of loose versus branded turmeric powders vis-a-vis curcumin content and the presence of unwarranted extraneous colours from city markets in India using a newly developed two-dimensional high-performance thin-layer chromatography (2D-HPTLC) method. The results show that curcumin content in branded samples ranged from 2.2% to 3.7%, while non-branded samples had from 0.3% to 2.6%. Though none of the branded turmeric powders contained artificial colours, 17% of loose powders showed the presence of extraneous colour metanil yellow, in the range 1.0-8.5 mg g-1, which may pose health threats. Low curcumin content in the analysed samples may be due to mixing of other curcuma species or their curcumin-depleted matrices and foreign starches as cheaper alternatives. This is supported by the fact that major Indian turmeric trade types are known to possess curcumin contents ranging from 2.1% to 8.6%, with an average of 4.8%. There is thus an urgent need to prescribe realistic curcumin limits for turmeric powder, otherwise there is no obligation on the part of traders to stick to any minimum levels and consumers will keep on getting this nutrient-depleted household spice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]