Search

Objectives: To report the outcomes of pediatric patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in single rooms without high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters, laminar air flow or positive pressure at our centre and discuss the adaptations of a high-volume government centre. Methods: Data of the first 20 children who underwent allogeneic HSCT between May 2019 and July 2023 in adaptive settings were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were managed in in single rooms without HEPA filters, positive pressure or laminar air flow. Supportive care in the form of antimicrobial prophylaxis, veno-occlusive disease prophylaxis, anti-epileptics (with busulfan) and irradiated blood products were provided. Trained manpower including multi-specialty consultations were readily available. All complications including infections were managed as per standard guidelines. Results: The median (range) of children included was 6 (1–20) years. For eight patients we used alternate donors. The mean (SD) time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 17.0 (8.07) days and 18.8 (10.1) days, respectively. The mean (SD) time to discharge from the hospital was 30.9 (10.04) days. There were no deaths within 30 days. Six children each developed acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The overall survival at a median follow-up of 292 days was 70% (n = 14). Conclusions: With certain adaptations in the existing infrastructure in resource-limited settings, allogeneic HSCT can be performed with good outcomes, provided experienced, dedicated and adequate personnel, comprehensive supportive care, multidisciplinary consultative support and isolation are provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment modality for a range of hematological disorders including malignancies. The increasing volumes of HSCTs impact transfusion services and the requirement of blood products vary depending on the primary disease, type and phase of transplant, and the HSCT donor type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed the factors affecting blood component requirements in patients undergoing HSCT. The authors studied the transfusion requirement of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and platelets (PLT) up to 100 days post-transplant among 617 adult patients undergoing HSCT during the study period (2007-2019). RESULTS: Requirement of PRBC and PLT was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in allogenic HSCT cases across all three phases of transplant compared to autologous HSCT. Unlike PRBC requirement, the PLT requirement was significantly higher during peri-transplant period for haploidentical HSCT and major ABO-incompatible HSCT group compared to matched related donor HSCT and ABO identical HSCT, respectively. In subset analysis based on diagnosis with leukemia as reference, the multiple myeloma group required less while the anemia group required more PRBC and PLT transfusions. The leukemia group required more PRBC than lymphoma group, while the PLT requirement was vice-versa. CONCLUSION: Factors such as allogeneic HSCT, haploidentical donor type, major ABO-incompatible HSCT, and primary diagnosis as leukemia or anemia were the predictors for increased need of blood products. As higher transfusion requirements may translate into increased costs of treatment, a study like this can help in managing blood component inventory and planning treatment costs of a HSCT program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for hematologic malignancies. Nowadays, usually, haploidentical stem cell transplant is performed across the ABO blood group barrier; however, the effect of ABO incompatibility on haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is still uncertain. Methodology: Retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent haploidentical hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation at our hospital was performed. The patient cohort was classified in to two arms: ABO compatible and ABO-incompatible haploidentical stem cell transplantation. ABO-incompatible was further categorized as major mismatch, minor mismatch and bidirectional mismatch. The average follow-up period was 6 months posttransplant for which the following parameters were studied: (a) engraftment kinetics for white blood cell (WBC) and platelets, (b) graft rejection, (c) overall graft survival, (d) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and (e) clinical variation in outcome for patients receiving peripheral blood stem cell/bone marrow harvest (BMH) as the source of stem cells. Results: The median age of recipients for both ABO compatible and ABO incompatible was 24 years and most of them were parent-offspring transplants. A total of 39 patients underwent haploidentical stem cell transplantation during the study period. Our cohort consisted of 23 ABO-compatible patients and 17 ABO incompatible patients. Out of these 17, 6 were major mismatch, 11 were minor mismatch and none were bidirectional mismatch. Of these 39 patients, 82% (32/39) engrafted within the normal expected time frame. The average days to WBC and platelet engraftment in these subgroups were noted to be as follows: Major - 12 and 18 days, compatible - 9 and 17 days, and minor - 10 and 17 days, respectively. Graft failure was observed in 20% (8/39) of patients, of which 4 patients had undergone ABO-compatible transplants while 4 patients had undergone minor ABO incompatible transplants. In this study, we observed that major ABO incompatibility had severe risk of GVHD (17%) compared to compatible (39%) and minor (27%) blood group mismatch. The overall survival rate in 6 months was equal (70%) in both arms. 5/39 patients, i.e., 12% received BMH as the source of stem cells, of these 80% are alive. Conclusion: Haploidentical transplants done in patients with ABO-incompatible donors had outcomes comparable to the ABO-compatible group. The risk of severe GVHD did not increased in the ABO mismatch group. Recipient of BMH had a marginally better graft survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the curative option for many primary immune deficiency disorders (PID). In the last 5 years, increased awareness, availability of diagnostics based on flow cytometry, genetic testing, improved supportive care, use of reduced toxicity conditioning, and success of haploidentical donor HSCT have improved access to HSCT for children with PID in India. We present results on children with PID who underwent HSCT across India and the factors that influenced outcome. Patients and Methods: We collected retrospective data on the outcome of HSCT for PID from seven centers. We analyzed the impact of the type of PID, conditioning regimen, time period of HSCT- before or after January 2016, graft versus host disease prophylaxis, cause of mortality and overall survival. Results: A total of 228 children underwent HSCT for PID at a median age of 12 months (range, 1 to 220 months) with a median follow up of 14.4 months. Infants accounted for 51.3% of the cohort and the male female ratio was 3:1. SCID (25%) and HLH (25%) were the more frequent diagnoses. Matched family donor was available in 36.4% and 44.3% children had a haploidentical HSCT. Reduced and myeloablative conditioning regimens were used with 64% children receiving a treosulfan based conditioning regimen. Peripheral blood stem cells were the predominant graft source at 69.3%. The survival in infants (60.2%) was inferior to children aged over 1 year (75.7% p value = 0.01). Children with Wiskott Aldrich syndrome (74.3%) and chronic granulomatous disease (82.6%) had the best outcomes. The survival was superior in children receiving HSCT from a matched sibling (78%) versus an alternate donor HSCT (61% p value = 0.04). In the cohort transplanted after January 2016 survival improved from 26.8% to 77.5% (p value = 0.00). Infection remains the main cause of mortality at in over 50% children. The 5-year overall survival rate was 68%. Conclusion: Survival of children with PID undergoing HSCT in India has improved dramatically in last 5 years. Alternate donor HSCT is now feasible and has made a therapeutic option accessible to all children with PID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Only 20–30% of patients requiring a blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) have a matched family donor. For the rest, alternative sources of graft are necessary to provide this curative procedure. Over the past 25 years, BMT from volunteer unrelated donors has undergone immense developments to be at par with matched family donor transplants. Similar developments have been witnessed in the field of unrelated cord blood transplantation. Thus, 90% of patients requiring a BMT in the developed worlds receive one from either of the two alternative graft sources. However, >11 million volunteer unrelated donors and 25,000 cord blood units worldwide do not solve the problem for patients from developing countries, due to lack of compatible human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match and enormous financial burden. Thus, Asian countries such as China and Korea have developed Haploidentical or mismatched family donor transplantation for their population with great success. In the light of these developments, this article discusses the options and opportunities for alternative donor BMT in the Indian scenario. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]