Search

Background and Objectives: The non-surgical treatment outcome of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains to be defined. We aimed to assess the outcomes of definitive chemoradiation (CRT) of GEJ tumors. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was entirely carried out in the radiation oncology ward of Cancer Institute of Iran. We included patients with adenocarcinoma histology whose tumors had involved the gastro-esophageal junction and underwent chemoradiotherapy without surgery. In the final analysis, we evaluated 50 patients with non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of GEJ (Siewert's type I and II) from 2008 to 2017. The primary outcome was overall survival; secondary outcomes were progression-free survival and local and distal metastasis. Results: The reasons for not undergoing surgery in order of frequency from highest to lowest were patient refusal or medical unfitness for surgery, tumor unresectability or progress at the time of operation and incident metastasis in pre-op restaging, and. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival rates were 53%, 26%, and 12%, respectively. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 44%, 18%, and 10%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of survival was a distant failure (P=0.031). Conclusion: Although the outcomes of non-surgical treatments are disappointing in GEJ adenocarcinomas, a few patients may experience long-term survival using definitive CRT. This option should be discussed with all patients who are not candidates for surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Colorectal carcinoma is one of most common cancers in Iran with increasing incidence. The mean age of the affected is decreasing. With progresses in multimodality treatment, we witnessed improved prognosis in colorectal cancers. Objectives: This study aimed at evaluating the outcomes of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed the oncologic treatment outcomes of patients with locally advanced (T3-4 or N+ve) rectal adenocarcinoma in our high volume cancer center, Iran cancer institute, Tehran, Iran. Patients with synchronous metastasis, previous malignancy, and history of pelvic radiation were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) rate and secondary endpoints were disease-free survival and pathologic response. Results: Of patients being treated between 2008 and 2014, 158 were entered to final analysis; they completed planned neoadjuvant treatment and retuned after surgery with pathology report. The mean age was 56 years and mean interval from radiotherapy to surgery was 9 weeks. Thirty percent achieved pathologic complete response. Two-year overall and disease-free survival rate was 87% and 80%, respectively. In multivariate analysis age, sex, local recurrence, clinical stage, and radiotherapy to surgery interval failed to predict OS. The pathologic response (complete vs. non-complete) and the absence of distant metastasis were independent predictors of OS. Conclusions: The rate of pathologic response and survival in our series was comparable to other big randomized studies in the world and even better than previous national reports. These findings emphasize the necessity of treating patients with locally advanced rectal cancer in high volume centers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In this study, we aim to evaluate the cosmetic outcome differences between Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) and whole breast radiotherapy (WBR) with further investigation of boosted IOERT., Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two referral centers in Tehran, Iran. 116 women aged 30 to 79 with early-stage breast cancer (T0-2N0-1M0) eligible for breast conservation were divided into two groups of 58 based on the intervention they received, and further subgroups were defined based on receiving boosted IOERT. Patients in both groups underwent breast conservation surgery and those in the IOERT group received either a 21 Gy radical dose (radical IOERT) or 12 Gy boosted electron beam radiotherapy and a routine fractionated dose of 50 Gy in 25 sessions of WBR (boosted IOERT). Those in the WBR group were administered 50Gy in 32 sessions. Physician-assessed cosmetic outcome was defined as the primary result and incidence of fat necrosis and fibrosis and post-operative chronic pain were secondary outcomes., Results: Post-operative cosmetic outcome scores and chronic pain, showed no significant difference between the two groups. The median cosmetic score in both groups was 9. Fat necrosis and fibrosis had significantly higher rates in the IOERT group (P., Value: 0.001). However, the majority (21/34 or 61.8%) of this complication was observed in the boosted IOERT subgroup and no statistical significance was recorded between the radical IOERT subgroup and the WBR group., Conclusions: In early-stage breast cancer treatment, radical IOERT has noninferiority compared to WBR in terms of cosmesis. Regarding fat necrosis and fibrosis, boosted IOERT was associated with higher rates in comparison to other groups. Therefore, radical IOERT seems to be a better treatment option for selected patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

On March 11th 2020, the coronavirus outbreak was declared a pandemic by the WHO. One of the groups that is considered high risk in this pandemic are cancer patients as they are treated with a variety of immune system suppressor treatment modalities and this puts them in a great risk for infectious disease (including COVID-19). Therefore, cancer patients require higher level measures for preventing and treating infectious diseases. furthermore, cancer patients may bear additional risk due to the restriction of access to the routine diagnostic and therapeutic services during such epidemic. Since most of the attention of health systems is towards patients affected with COVID-19, the need for structured and unified approaches to COVID-19 prevention and care specific to cancer patients and cancer centers is felt more than ever. This article provides the recommendations and possible actions that should be considered by patients, their caregivers and families, physician, nurses, managers and staff of medical centers involved in cancer diagnosis and treatment. We pursued two major goals in our recommendations: first, limiting the exposure of cancer patients to medical environments and second, modifying the treatment modalities in a manner that reduces the probability of myelosuppression such as delaying elective diagnostic and therapeutic services, shortening the treatment course, or prolonging the interval between treatment courses., (© 2020 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.)

Purpose: The optimal treatment for locally advanced GEJ and cardia adenocarcinoma is controversial. Several studies have shown that treating these patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery leads to survival benefits, and there are also studies that have declared conflicting results. It seems that there is still room for discussion. We calculated the survival rates and pathologic responses in our patients with characteristics which we mentioned above., Methods: Patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic GEJ and cardia adenocarcinomas (only patients with Siewert's type I and II), who were referred to Imam Khomeini hospital (Institute of cancer) between 2005 and 2014 and received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and underwent surgery were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Evaluations were done every 3 months., Results: Thirty-two patients enrolled in this study. Median follow up time was 23 months (Reverse Kaplan-Meier method). The rates of 1-year survival, 2-year survival, 3-year survival, 4-year survival, and 5-year survival were 75%, 52%, 52%, 37%, and 37%, respectively. No local recurrences occurred among patients; however, four patients experienced distal recurrence in the following locations: two cases (6.3%) in the liver, one case (3.1%) in the lung, and one case (3.1%) in the peritoneum. The rate of complete pathologic response (T 0 N 0 ) was 21.9%., Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced GEJ and cardia adenocarcinoma will lead to a survival benefit.