Search

Borehole instability problems have caused non-productive time while drilling operations in the Nahr Umr shale formation. The drilling difficulties, including stuck pipe, caving, and tight holes, have been identified as significant problems in this formation. This study aims to comprehend the causes of wellbore failure and choose the most suitable drilling strategy. In this regard, a mechanical earth model (MEM) was performed using open-hole wireline logging measurements from the offset wells data. Those data included gamma ray, density log, compressional wave velocity, shear wave velocity, neutrons porosity, and image log. Moreover, there were also measured data such as leak-off tests and modular formation dynamics testers that were applied to validate the model's accuracy. The analysis exhibited that the leading cause of wellbore instability problems was improper mud weight (10.6 ppg). In addition, inappropriate drilling practices and the heterogeneity of the Nahr Umr formation have magnified the risk of drilling problems. The MEM outcome proved that the mud weight should be 11.6–13.5 ppg to safely drill a vertical well. Thus, this work can be applied as a cost-effective tool when designing future neighboring deviated wells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Borehole instability problems lead to increased non-productive time, essentially during the drilling of shale formations. Past drilling experiences exhibited several problems: mud losses, tight hole, caving, mechanical stuck pipe, and extensive hole collapse. The study aims to construct a mechanical earth model (MEM) to analyze the wellbore stability. Thus, MEM was employed to define a safe mud weight window and improve the drilling performance on development wells. The specific analysis of wellbore instability showed that the primary cause of those instability problems was applying inadequate mud weight to drill the Tanuma shale formation. In addition, the minimum required drilling density to drill through the Tanuma formation is a strong function with a wellbore inclination. Thus, for the Tanuma formation, the model indicates that wellbore inclinations above 50° should be avoided. NW–SE azimuth provides less risk in terms of hole collapse in the Tanuma formation. Also, the sensitivity points showed that the appropriate mud weight for horizontal wells in Mishrif formation was 12.5 ppg. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The harvest of hydrocarbon from the depleted reservoir is crucial during field development. Therefore, drilling operations in the depleted reservoir faced several problems like partial and total lost circulation. Continuing production without an active water drive or water injection to support reservoir pressure will decrease the pore and fracture pressure. Moreover, this depletion will affect the distribution of stress and change the mud weight window. This study focused on vertical stress, maximum and minimum horizontal stress redistributions in the depleted reservoirs due to decreases in pore pressure and, consequently, the effect on the mud weight window. 1D and 4D robust geomechanical models are built based on all available data in a mature oil field. The 1D model was used to estimate all mechanical rock properties, stress, and pore pressure. The minimum and maximum horizontal stress were determined using the poroelastic horizontal strain model. Furthermore, the mechanical properties were calibrated using drained triaxial and uniaxial compression tests. The pore pressure was tested using modular dynamic tester log MDT. The Mohr–Coulomb model was applied in the 4D model to calculate the stress distribution in the depleted reservoir. According to study wells, the target area has been classified into four main groups in Mishrif reservoir based on depletion: highly, moderately, slightly, and no depleted region. Also, the results showed that the units had been classified into three main categories based on depletion state (from above to low depleted): L1.1, L1.2, and M1. The mean average reduction in minimum horizontal stress magnitude was 322 psi for L1.1, 183.86 psi for L1.2, and 115.56 psi for M1. Thus, the lower limit of fracture pressure dropped to a high value in L1.1, which is considered a weak point. As a result of changing horizontal stress, the mud weight window became narrow. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]