Search

Simple Summary: Ash sawfly, Tomostethus nigritus, larvae feed on the leaves of Fraxinus excelsior. In the last 20 years, outbreaks of these insects have become more common, and they cause severe defoliation of the tree crown. This pest is native to Europe, and it was recorded for the first time on the island of Ireland in Belfast, Northern Ireland (UK) in 2016. This article is the first report of T. nigritus in the Republic of Ireland (IE). Damaged leaves and larvae were observed on ash trees in Co. Kildare in summer 2021. The larvae were collected and then identified using molecular analyses. Similar damaged leaves were observed on trees in Co. Dublin, which showed mild defoliation of the crown. However, severe defoliation of ash trees has also been recorded in Co. Meath in 2021. No control treatments are available against the insects, and little is known about the cause of the outbreaks. Severe outbreaks by T. nigritus could further affect the delicate situation that the Irish ash tree population is currently facing caused by another severe antagonist of Fraxinus, the ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. This is the first report of the ash sawfly, Tomostethus nigritus, in the Republic of Ireland. We observed defoliated leaves of Fraxinus excelsior L. and T. nigritus larvae at a forestry plantation in Co. Kildare. Morphological observation of the larvae and DNA analysis using mitochondrial COI barcoding confirmed the identification of this pest of ash. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Populations of oak (Quercus petraea and Q. robur) were investigated using morphological and molecular (AFLP) analyses to assess species distinction. The study aimed to describe species distinction in Irish oak populations and to situate this in a European context., Methods: Populations were sampled from across the range of the island of Ireland. Leaf morphological characters were analysed through clustering and ordination methods. Putative neutral molecular markers (AFLPs) were used to analyse the molecular variation. Cluster and ordination analyses were also performed on the AFLP markers in addition to calculations of genetic diversity and F-statisitcs., Key Results: A notable divergence was uncovered between the morphological and molecular analyses. The morphological analysis clearly differentiated individuals into their respective species, whereas the molecular analysis did not. Twenty species-specific AFLP markers were observed from 123 plants in 24 populations but none of these was species-diagnostic. Principal Coordinate Analysis of the AFLP data revealed a clustering, across the first two axes, of individuals according to population rather than according to species. High F(ST) values calculated from AFLP markers also indicated population differentiation (F(ST) = 0.271). Species differentiation accounted for only 13 % of the variation in diversity compared with population differentiation, which accounted for 27 %., Conclusions: The results show that neutral molecular variation is partitioned more strongly between populations than between species. Although this could indicate that the populations of Q. petraea and Q. robur studied may not be distinct species at a molecular level, it is proposed that the difficulty in distinguishing the species in Irish oak populations using AFLP markers is due to population differentiation masking species differences. This could result from non-random mating in small, fragmented woodland populations. Hybridization and introgression between the species could also have a significant role.