Search

Objective: The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluated whether cold or warm cardioplegia are associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and the prognostic role of the latter on early stroke and neurological mortality., Method: This was a retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from 9 cardiac centers in Italy and the United States including patients undergoing surgery between 2010 and 2018. From the 9 institutional databases, 17,231 patients underwent isolated CABG on-pump, using either warm cardioplegia (n = 7730) or cold cardioplegia (n = 9501); among the latter group blood and crystalloid cardioplegia were used in 691 and 8810 patients, respectively. After matching, two pairs of 4162 patients (overall cohort 8324) were analyzed., Results: In matched population, the rate of POAF was 18% (1472 cases), 15% (608) in warm group versus 21% (864) in cold group (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that cold cardioplegia was associated with higher rate of POAF, along with age, hypercholesterolemia, LVEF, reoperation, preoperative IABP, previous stroke, cardiopulmonary and cross-clamp. Moreover, cold cardioplegia as well as POAF increased the rate of postoperative stroke as well as early mortality and neurological mortality Propensity-weighted cohort included 11,830 (70%) patients out of 17,231. After adjustment, both cold blood and cold crystalloid cardioplegia negatively influenced POAF, stroke and neurological mortality., Conclusions: Warm cardioplegia may reduce the rate of POAF in CABG patients with respect to cold cardioplegia, either blood or crystalloid. This has a prognostic impact on postoperative stroke and neurological mortality., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Minimization of bleeding to reduce the use of blood products is of utmost importance in cardiac surgery. Statins are known for their pleiotropic effects beyond lipid-lowering properties, and the use of atorvastatin preoperatively is associated with reduced risk of bleeding and blood product use after coronary surgery. However, no studies have investigated if this beneficial effect also extends to aortic valve surgery., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 1145 consecutive patients undergoing elective primary isolated aortic valve replacement meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected from January 2009 to December 2017 (547 in the atorvastatin group, 598 in the control group). Postoperative bleeding, blood product use, and complications were monitored during hospitalization., Results: Postoperative bleeding was significantly lower in the atorvastatin group compared with the controls in the first 12 h after surgery (372 ± 137 vs 561 ± 219 ml; P = 0.001) and considering overall bleeding (678 ± 387 vs 981 ± 345 ml, P = 0.001). A total of 32.3% of controls and 26.3% of atorvastatin users received packed red blood cells (P = 0.027), and major surgical complications were similar between the groups. Postoperative length of stay was shorter in the atorvastatin group with an average reduction of 1 day of hospitalization (6.0 ± 1.4 vs 6.9 ± 2.1 days; P = 0.001). Postoperative bleeding among the atorvastatin-treated patients was significantly greater in those taking lower doses compared to those taking higher doses of atorvastatin with a 20% between-group difference (P = 0.001)., Conclusions: Preoperative treatment with atorvastatin might reduce postoperative bleeding and transfusion of packed red blood cells in patients undergoing elective isolated aortic valve replacement. This result might translate into faster recovery after surgery and reduced hospitalization costs., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Despite claims of feasibility, to date no study has examined the effect of systematic bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) use in a large cohort of real-world unselected patients. The CATHolic University EXtensive BIMA Grafting Study (CATHEXIS) registry was designed to assess the feasibility and safety of systematic BIMA grafting., Methods: The CATHEXIS was a single-centre, prospective, observational, propensity-matched study. The study was supposed to include 2 arms of 500 patients each: a prospective arm and a retrospective arm. The prospective arm included almost all patients referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at our institution after the start of the CATHEXIS with very few exceptions. BIMA would have been used in all these patients. The retrospective arm included patients submitted to CABG before the start of the CATHEXIS and propensity matched to the prospective group (average BIMA use 50%; the radial artery was extensively used). Safety analyses were scheduled after enrolment of 200, 300 and 400 BIMA patients., Results: After the first 226 patients, the BIMA use percentage was 88.5% (200 of 226). In 178 (89%) patients, mammary arteries were used as Y graft. Postoperative mortality was 2%, and incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction, graft failure and sternal complications were 3.5%, 3% and 5.5%, respectively. No perioperative stroke occurred. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (particularly graft failure and sternal complications) in the BIMA arm were significantly higher than those in the propensity-matched cohort; the study was stopped for safety., Conclusions: In a real world setting the systematic use of BIMA was associated with a higher incidence of perioperative adverse events (particularly sternal complications). Individualization of the revascularization strategy and use of alternative arterial conduits are probably preferable to systematic use of BIMA.

Background: Sternal dehiscence and wound instability are troublesome complications following median sternotomy. Classic sternal approximation with stainless steel wires may not be the ideal approach in patients predisposed to these complications. We tested the efficacy of polydioxanone (PDS) suture in sternal closure and in prevention of complications in comparison to steel wires in high-risk individuals., Methods: Three hundred sixty-six patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy and having body surface area (BSA) less than 1.5 m(2) were randomly assigned to receive PDS (n = 181) or stainless steel (SS, n = 185) sternal approximation. The study was focused on aseptic sternal complications, namely bone dehiscence and superficial wound instability., Results: Both bone dehiscence and superficial wound instability were less frequent in the PDS Group (4 and 3 cases in the SS Group, respectively, vs. no cases in the PDS Group). Cox proportional hazards regression model in the whole study population identified female sex, chronic renal insufficiency, diabetes, advanced age, lower sternal thickness, osteoporosis, corticosteroid therapy, and prolonged CPB or ventilation times as predisposing factors to any of the two studied sternal complications., Discussion: Data suggest that PDS suture can protect against development of aseptic sternal complications following median sternotomy in high-risk patients with little body mass. The adoption of PDS in other subsets of patients, i.e., obese individuals, is to be questioned.

Background: To describe our experience in the treatment of high risk coronary artery bypass patients and compare patients assigned to on-pump or off-pump surgery., Methods: During a 42-month period 306 high risk (Euroscore > 5) coronary artery bypass patients were consecutively treated at our institution. On the basis of the coronary anatomy and possibility of achieving a complete revascularization, 197 patients were assigned to off-pump and 109 to on-pump operation. Overall mortality was 6.2% (19 of 306 patients)., Results: Although patients treated off-pump had a better cardiac status, no clinical advantages related to the avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass were found in the overall population. Off-pump patients had more early and late cardiac complications, whereas patients operated on-pump exhibited an higher incidence of postoperative systemic organ dysfunction. Off-pump surgery improved in-hospital outcome only in the subset of patients at highest risk., Conclusions: Avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass does not confer significant clinical advantages in all high risk coronary patients; instead, there are particular subsets of patients in whom beating heart surgery can be particularly indicated and others for whom on-pump revascularization appears a better solution. Adaptation of the operation to the single patient is probably the way to improve outcome.

Background: Mediastinitis is a very serious complication after cardiac surgery. To date, the optimal treatment of mediastinitis is still controversial: the "closed wound" procedures and the "open wound" treatments are the two conventional modalities reported in the literature., Methods: Between January 1995 and December 2000, 20 patients, who had previously been submitted to cardiac surgery, were treated by a modification of the "open wound" treatment strategy for postoperative mediastinitis. All patients were scheduled for 2, 6, and 12-month clinical follow-up. The procedure performed consisted of three major steps: 1) early sternum reopening, followed by phase 2) including irrigation of the wound 3 times daily, and the final step 3) of delayed reconstructive surgery using the pectoralis major myocutaneous advancement flap closure technique. We prospectively analyzed the short- and long-term results of these procedures., Results: The overall duration of hospitalization was 25 +/- 10 days; no patient required intensive care unit permanency. Clinical success was achieved in all 20 cases (100%). No recurrences of local (such as fistulas or abscesses) or systemic infections were noted, and no patient required sternal reopening during follow-up. An optimal cosmetic result was obtained in all patients and only 2 cases had persistent sternal pain regressing at the 6-month follow-up control., Conclusions: Our data suggest that for patients with severe mediastinitis, this treatment strategy is safe. The clinical and esthetic success rates are high, the recovery time rapid, and the rates of short- and long-term complications very low.