1. COVID-19 ARDS Is Characterized by Increased Dead Space Ventilation ComparedWith Non-COVID ARDS.
- Author
-
Bertelli, Michele, Fusina, Federica, Prezioso, Chiara, Cavallo, Erika, Nencini, Niccolò, Crisci, Serena, Tansini, Francesca, Mari, Letizia Mazzuca, Hoxha, Laureta, Lombardi, Fabiana, and Natalini, Giuseppe
- Subjects
INTENSIVE care units ,STATISTICS ,STATISTICAL significance ,COVID-19 ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,AIRWAY (Anatomy) ,MULTIVARIATE analysis ,MULTIPLE organ failure ,CONTINUING education units ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,MANN Whitney U Test ,FISHER exact test ,REGRESSION analysis ,ARTIFICIAL respiration ,ADULT respiratory distress syndrome ,MATHEMATICAL variables ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,POLYMERASE chain reaction ,ELECTRONIC health records ,LOGISTIC regression analysis ,DATA analysis software ,ODDS ratio ,LONGITUDINAL method - Abstract
Background: ARDS in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by microcirculatory alterations in the pulmonary vascular bed, which could increase dead-space ventilation more than in non-COVID-19 ARDS. We aimed to establish if dead-space ventilation is different in patients with COVID-19 ARDS when compared with patients with non-COVID-19 ARDS. Methods: A total of 187 subjects with COVID-19 ARDS and 178 subjects with non-COVID-19 ARDS who were undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation were included in the study. The association between the ARDS types and dead-space ventilation, compliance of the respiratory system, subjects' characteristics, organ failures, and mechanical ventilation was evaluated by using data collected in the first 24 h of mechanical ventilation. Results: Corrected minute ventilation (V
E ), a dead-space ventilation surrogate, was higher in the subjects with COVID-19 ARDS versus in those with non-COVID-19 ARDS (median [interquartile range] 12.6 [10.2-15.8] L/min vs 9.4 [7.5-11.6] L/min; P < .001). Increased corrected VE was independently associated with COVID-19 ARDS (odds ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.07-1.47; P = .007). The best compliance of the respiratory system, obtained after testing different PEEPs, was similar between the subjects with COVID-19 ARDS and the subjects with non-COVID-19 ARDS (mean ± SD 38 ± 11 mL/cm H2 O vs 37 ± 11 mL/cm H2 O, respectively; P = .61). The subjects with COVID-19 ARDS received higher median (interquartile range) PEEP (12 [10-14] cm H2 O vs 8 [5-9] cm H2 O; P < .001) and lower median (interquartile range) tidal volume (5.8 [5.5-6.3] mL/kg vs 6.6 [6.1-7.3] mL/kg; P < .001) than the subjects with non-COVID-19 ARDS, being these differences maintained at multivariable analysis. In the multivariable analysis, the subjects with COVID-19 ARDS showed a lower risk of anamnestic arterial hypertension (odds ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.45; P < .001) and lower neurologic sequential organ failure assessment score (odds ratio 0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.27; P < .001) than the subjects with non-COVID-19 ARDS. Conclusions: Indirect measurements of dead space were higher in subjects with COVID-19 ARDS compared with subjects with non-COVID-19 ARDS. The best compliance of the respiratory system was similar in both ARDS forms provided that different PEEPs were applied. A wide range of compliance is present in every ARDS type; therefore, the setting of mechanical ventilation should be individualized patient by patient and not based on the etiology of ARDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF