Search

Background: Renal transplantation is the most successful therapy for improving survival and quality of life for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKTx) has been used as an alternative to reduce the stay on the waiting list of patients with ESRD. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has become the standard procedure for LDKTx.Objective: This study aims to describe evolution of surgical technique with LDN at our institute.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our experience with LDN performed from January, 2003 to November, 2016, focusing on describing modifications of the surgical technique and devices made during those years. Demographics, operative factors, and postoperative complications of donors were reviewed.Results: From the beginning of our experience with LDKTx we have performed 185 cases. From 2003 to 2016, 144 LDN were performed. Modifying our technique in response to the learning curve, complications encountered, and technological advancements, we experienced low complication rates.Conclusions: Continual refinement with LDN techniques based on intraoperative observations and technological advances is necessary to keep complication rates low and reduce donor morbidity and time for recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is the only definitive and curative treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the Italian score for organ allocation (ISO) in terms of the waiting-list mortality, probability of LT, and patient survival after LT., Patient and Methods: All of the adult patients on the waiting list for LT at our institute from January 2014 to December 2017 were included in the study. The probabilities of death while on the waiting list, dropout from the list, and LT were compared by means of cumulative incidence functions, in a competing risk time-to-event analysis setting. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate and compare the probability of death and to find potential risk factors for waiting-list death., Results: There were 286 patients on the waiting list for LT during the study period, 122 of whom entered the waiting list prior to the implementation of ISO (Group A) and 164 afterward (Group B). Group A had 62 transplants, and Group B had 116 transplants. Group B showed a lesser probability of death (P = .005) and a greater probability of transplant (P < .001) compared to Group A. In the 2 groups, post-transplant survival was similar., Conclusion: Based on preliminary clinical experience from a single transplant center, the ISO allocation system demonstrated an overall reduced probability of patient death while on the waiting list without impairing post-LT survival, suggesting that the ISO system might represent an improved method of organ allocation, with a more beneficial distribution of livers., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Complex liver trauma often presents major diagnostic and management problems. Current operative management is mainly centered on packing, damage control, and early utilization of interventional radiology for angiography and embolization. In this retrospective observational study of patients admitted to the Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies, Palermo, Italy, from 1999 to 2010, we included patients that underwent hepatic resection for complex liver injuries (grade I to V according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale). Age, gender, mechanism of trauma, type of resection, surgical complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality were the variables analyzed. A total of 53 adult patients were admitted with liver injury and 29 underwent surgical treatment; the median age was 26.7 years. Mechanism was blunt in 52 patients. The overall morbidity was 30 per cent, morbidity related to liver resection was 15.3 per cent. Mortality was 2 per cent in the series of patients undergoing liver resection for complex hepatic injury, whereas in the nonoperative group, morbidity was 17 per cent and mortality 2 per cent. Liver resection should be considered a serious surgical option, as initial or delayed management, in patients with complex liver injury and can be accomplished with low mortality and liver-related morbidity when performed in specialized liver surgery/transplant centers.