Search

Introduction: The most frequent reason for performing a distal pancreatectomy is the presence of cystic or neuroendocrine tumors, in which the distal pancreatic stump is often soft and non fibrotic. This parenchymal consistence represents the main risk factor for post-operative pancreatic fistula. In order to identify the fistula and assessing its severity postoperative monitoring of amylase from intraperitoneal drains is important., Methods: From a retrospective multicentric database analysis were included 33 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neoplastic disease., Results: Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in four cases. One patient had a ductal adenocarcinoma, two presented with pancreatic endocrine neoplasms and the last one had an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia. Two patients underwent open, the other two laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy., Discussion: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy worsen the quality of life, prolong the post-operative stay and delay further adjuvant therapy. In patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy literature exposed some advantages deriving from the placement of abdominal drainages only in selected cases and from their early removal. Patients presenting a high risk of pancreatic fistula had higher amylase levels of drainage fluid in the first postoperative day., Conclusion: POPF is the most frequently complication after pancreatectomy. In our analysis DFA1>5000 can be considered as a predictive factor for pancreatic fistula. For this reason, the systematic measurement of amylase in drain fluid in first-postoperative day can be considered a good clinical practice., (Copyright © 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients who undergo low anterior rectal resection, the fashioning of a covering stoma (CS) is still controversial. In fact, a covering stoma (ileostomy or colostomy) is worsened by major complications related to the procedure, longer recovery time, necessity of a re-intervention under general anesthesia for stoma closure and poorer quality of life. The advantage of Ghost Ileostomy (GI) is that an ileostomy can be performed only when there is clinical evidence of anastomotic leakage, without performing further interventions with related complications when anastomotic leak is absent and therefore the procedure is not necessary. Moreover, in case of anastomotic dehiscence and necessity of delayed stoma opening, mortality and morbidity in patients with GI are comparable with the ones that occur in patients which had a classic covering stoma. On the other hand, is simple to think about the possible economic saving: avoiding an admission for performing the closure of the ileostomy, with all the costs connected (OR, hospitalization, post-operative period, treatment of possible complications) represents a huge saving for the hospital management and also raise the quality of life of the patients., Methods: In this study we prospectively analyzed 20 patients who underwent anterior extra-peritoneal rectum resection for rectal carcinoma with TME and fashioning of GI realized with or without abdominal parietal split., Results: In the group of patients that received a GI without split laparotomy mortality was absent and in one case an anastomotic leak occurred. In the group of patients in which GI with split laparotomy was fashioned, one death occurred and there were one case of infection and one respiratory complication. Clinical follow-up was 12 months., Conclusions: The use of different techniques for fashioning a GI do not present significant differences when they are performed by expert surgeons, but further evidence is needed with more randomized trials, in order to have more data supporting the clinical observation.

Background: This study investigated hormonal parameters of gonadal function in severely obese men before and 1 year after undergoing biliopancreatic diversion (BPD)., Methods: This observational 1-year postoperative study conducted at medical and surgical clinics at an academic medical center in Italy followed 20 severely obese men age 21 to 63 years, with a mean (+/- standard deviation) body mass index (BMI) of 47.3 +/- 13.1. The following parameters were evaluated: body composition, using body impedance analysis (BIA), and serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), total testosterone, estradiol 17beta, and leptin., Results: At a mean 12 +/- 1 months after surgery, the patients showed a significant decrease in weight, from 132.1 +/- 36.9 before surgery to 93.5 +/- 20 kg (P < .0001), and BMI, from 47.3 +/- 13.1 before surgery to 33.5 +/- 7 (P < .0001). LH increased from 2.42 +/- 1.59 to 4.97 +/- 2.6 mIU/ml (P < .0001), FSH increased from 2.85 +/- 1.85 to 4.9 +/- 4.2 mIU/mL (P = .021), and total testosterone increased from subnormal presurgical values to within normal range (2.81 +/- 1.08 to 9.12 +/- 1.37 ng/mL; P < .0001), whereas estradiol 17beta decreased from elevated basal levels of 44.0 +/- 29 to 16.7 +/- 6.9 pg/mL (P < .0001). The basal leptin level dropped from 33.0 +/- 9.23 to 16.6 +/- 5.12 ng/mL (P < .0001), reflecting the decrease in body fat. Subjective improvement in sexual performance was reported by 80% of patients., Conclusions: Severe obesity is coupled with some significant alterations of the gonadotropin-testicular axis and estradiol 17beta and leptin blood levels. These derangements were substantially corrected by 1 year after BPD., (((c)) 2006 American Society for Bariatric Surgery.)