Search

Surgery is the first-line therapy for treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and interventional radiotherapy is recommended when surgery is not feasible, contraindicated, or refused by the patient. To provide a multidisciplinary systematic review of the role of interventional radiotherapy for the treatment of cSCC of the nasal vestibule. A systematic search was performed; primary outcomes were tumour local control and overall survival. Acute toxicity, late toxicity, and functional cosmetic results, regardless of the scoring systems used, were secondary outcomes. After full-text review of the 92 papers initially identified, we included only 10 papers in the review; no randomized controlled trials or prospective studies were identified. Five studies reported five-year local control, with rates ranging between 69% and 97%. A high level of heterogeneity was observed regarding the methods used to assess treatment-related toxicity. Interventional radiotherapy may be considered for lesions specifically arising from the area of the nasal vestibule. A multidisciplinary approach might help to select cases that are potential candidates for conservative treatment according to the tumour and the patient's features.

Purpose: To assess the contribution of Italian radiation oncologists in the current management of recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG), focusing on a reirradiation (reRT) approach., Methods: In 2015, the Reirradiation and the Central Nervous System Study Groups on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) proposed a survey. All Italian radiation oncologists were individually invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their clinical management of recurrent HGG, focusing on a reRT approach., Results: A total of 37 of 210 questionnaires were returned (18% of all centers): 16 (43%) from nonacademic hospitals, 14 (38%) from academic hospitals, 5 (13%) from private institutions, and 2 (6%) from hadron therapy centers. The majority of responding centers (59%) treated ≤5 cases per year. Performance status at the time of recurrence, along with a target diameter <5 cm and an interval from primary radiation ≥6 months, were the prevalent predictive factors considered for reRT. Sixty percent of reirradiated patients had already received a salvage therapy, either chemotherapy (40%) or reoperation (20%). The most common approach for reRT was fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to a mean (photon) dose of 41.6 Gy., Conclusions: Although there were wide variations in the clinical practice of reRT across the 37 centers, the core activities were reasonably consistent. These findings provide a basis for encouraging a national collaborative study to develop, implement, and monitor the use of reRT in this challenging clinical setting.

The characteristics associated with non-attendance to mammographic breast cancer screening were studied by interviewing a random sample (213 attenders, 121 non-attenders in the 1989 screening) of residents in one of the municipalities of the Florence District Program, where screening has been ongoing since 1970. The overall attendance rate was 60%, and it was dependent on age (40-49 years, 66.5%; 50-59 years, 62.5%; 60-70 years, 55.5%), whereas a significant association with socio-economic status, educational level and health-behavior reported in other programs was not confirmed in the study. This finding suggests that determinants of non-attendance may vary and should be evaluated in each local setting. The belief that screening is useless, fear of cancer being detected, postponement and laziness were the most common motivations of refusal stated by non-attenders, and such a negative attitude towards screening was rather strong since most non-attenders stated they would not like to be informed or stimulated to attend future screenings. Rapid improvement of attendance rates in such a context might be achieved only by putting special pressure on women aimed to change their negative attitude towards screening and their opinion about the benefits of early breast cancer detection. This might be regarded as unacceptable and however would involve high costs and a major organization effort.