Search

Purpose: To test the detection of subclinical corneal ectasia using integrated Scheimpflug tomography and biomechanical assessment in a Japanese population., Methods: This prospective, case-control study included 23 patients with very asymmetric ectasia (VAE) and 70 normal controls. Patients with VAE had defined clinical ectasia in one eye and a fellow eye with normal topography (VAE-NT). Objective topography for confirming normal topography in VAE-NT cases included having 0% similarity and 0% severity derived from Placido-disk based topography. Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and corneal biomechanical assessment were performed. The Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Deviation index (BAD-D), Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI), and Tomographic Biomechanical Index (TBI) were compared and their discriminating ability for detecting ectasia was assessed., Results: For differentiating normal and VAE-NT eyes, the areas under the receiver operating curve for the BAD-D, CBI, and TBI were 0.668, 0.660, and 0.751, respectively. The TBI cut-off of 0.259 provided 52.17% sensitivity and 88.57% specificity. Fourteen VAE-NT cases (60.9%) were abnormal in at least one of the criteria of the BAD-D > 1.60 (39.1%), CBI > 0.5 (26.1%), or TBI > 0.29 (43.5%). Conversely, nine VAE-NT cases (39.1%) exhibited normal values for the BAD-D, CBI, and TBI., Conclusions: In the current study, 40% of VAE-NT eyes were classified as normal by the BAD-D, CBI, and TBI. Although some of these cases may truly represent unilateral ectasia, further advances are needed to enhance ectasia detection and characterize the susceptibility for ectasia progression. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(6):383-390.]., (Copyright 2019, SLACK Incorporated.)